Skip to main content
Log in

Neutralizing the effect of the angle variations on the drop detachment in automatic GMAW system

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two forces play the main role on the drop detachment in gas metal arc welding process: the electromagnetic and gravitational forces. Since in an automatic pipeline system, the welding angle varies from 0° to 180° in each pass, the total force will vary, so the drop detaching will not remain invariable during the welding time. In the previous works Doodman Tipi (Int J Adv Manu Technol 50:137–147, 2010 [1]), Doodman Tipi (Int J Adv Manu Technol 50:149–161, 2010 [2]), the angle variation effects on the metal transfer was studied on both transfer modes (free flight and short circuit). In this paper, the effect of the input parameters on the drop detaching is studied. Also, a welding current pattern is presented in order to neutralize the effect of the angle variation around the pipe. Furthermore, suitable patterns for other parameters (arc voltage, travel speed, and electrode speed) are introduced to keep constant the molten electrode volume, heat input, voltage to current relation, and energy density. This would guarantee stabilization of the other welding specifications. Finally, several experimental and simulation examples illustrate to achieve the regular detachment using the presented method, and results are compared with the un-neutralized case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doodman Tipi AR (2010) The study on the drop detachment for automatic pipeline GMAW system: free flight mode. Int J Adv Manu Tech 50:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Doodman Tipi AR (2010) The study on the drop detachment for automatic pipeline GMAW system: short circuit mode. Int J Adv Manu Tech 50:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beutzel EW, Harmer T, Einerson C, Moore KL, Johnson JA, Smartt HB (1995) Modeling and simulation of a GMAW system. In: Proc 4th Int Conf Trends Weld Res, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, USA

  4. Shepard M, Cook G (1992) A nonlinear time-domain simulation of self-regulation in gas-metal arc welding. In: Proc 3rd Int Conf Trends Weld Res, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, USA

  5. Waddoups M (1994) Detection and modeling of droplet detachment in gas metal arc welding. MS Thesis, Idaho State Univ, Pocatello, Idaho, USA

  6. Wang Y, Tsai HL (2001) Impingement of filler droplets and weld pool dynamics during gas metal arc welding process. Int J Heat Mass Tran 44:2067–2080

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hermans MJM, Den Ouden G (1999) Process behavior and stability in short circuit gas metal arc welding. Weld J 78:137s–141s

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davies MH, Wahab M, Painter MJ (2000) An investigation of the interaction of a molten droplet with a liquid weld pool surface: a computational and experimental approach. Weld J 79:18s–23s

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim CH, Zhang W, Debroy T (2003) Modeling of temperature field and solidified surface profile during gas metal arc fillet welding. J Appl Phys 94:2667–2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guoxiang XU, Chuansong WU (2007) Numerical analysis of weld pool geometry in globular-transfer gas metal arc welding. Front Mater Sci China 1:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu J, Tsai HL (2006) Effects of current on droplet generation and arc plasma in gas metal arc welding. J Appl Phys 100:053304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nemchinsky VA (1994) Size and shape of the liquid droplet at the molten tip of an arc electrode. J Phys D Appl Phys 27:1433–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosworth MR, Deam RT (2000) Influence of GMAW droplet size on fume formation rate. J Phys D Appl Phys 33:2605–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones LA, Mendez P, Weiss D, Eagar TW (1997) Dynamic behavior of gas metal arc welding. In: Proc 9th conf iron steel technol, Pohang, Korea

  15. Jones LA, Eagar TW, Lang JH (1998) A dynamic model of drops detaching from a gas metal arc welding electrode. J Phys D Appl Phys 31:107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haidar J (1998) An analysis of the formation of metal droplets in arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 31:1233–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haidar J, Lowke JJ (1996) Predictions of metal droplet formation in arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 29:2951–2960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Planckaert JP, Djermoune EH, Brie D, Briandy F, Richard FP (2006) Droplet features extraction with a dynamic active contour for MIG/MAG welding modeling. In: Proc 18th Int Conf Sys Eng, ICSE, Coventry, UK

  19. Choi JH, Lee JY, Yoo CD (2001) Simulation of dynamic behavior in a GMAW system. Weld J 80:239s–245s

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moore KL, Naidu DS, Yender R, Tyler J (1997) Gas metal arc welding control: part I—modeling and analysis. Nonl Anal Theory Meth Appl 30:3101–3111

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomsen JS (2004) Advanced control methods for optimization of arc welding. Ph.D. Thesis, Dep Cont Eng, Aalborg Univ, Denmark

  22. Johnson JA, Watkins AD, Smartt HB (1992) A dynamic model of droplet growth and detachment in GMAW. In: Rec Tren Weld Sci Technol, ASM Int, Materials Park, Ohio, USA

  23. Yoo CD, Choi JH, Lee J (2001) Dynamic force balance model for metal transfer analysis in arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 34:2658–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lancaster JF (1986) The physics of welding, 2nd edn. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jones LA, Eagar TW, Lang JH (1998) Magnetic forces acting on molten drops in gas metal arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 31:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Amson JC (1965) Lorenz force in the molten tip of an arc electrode. J Appl Phys 16:1169–1179

    Google Scholar 

  27. Burleigh TD, Eagar TW (1983) Measurement of the force exerted by a welding arc. Metall Trans A 14:1223–1224

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jones LA, Eagar TW, Lang JH (1996) The temporal nature of forces acting on metal drops in gas metal arc welding. In: Proc 14th Symp Energy Eng Sci, Argonne, USA

  29. Jones LA, Eagar TW, Lang JH (1992) Investigation of drop detachment in gas metal arc welding. int trends weld Sci technol, ASM Int, Materials Park, Ohio, USA

  30. Palani PK, Morgan N (2006) Selection of parameters of pulsed current gas metal arc welding. J Mater Process Technol 172:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Subramanian S, White DR, Jones JE, Lyons DW (1999) Experimental approach to selection of pulsing parameters in pulsed GMAW. Weld J 11:166–172

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ates H (2007) Prediction of gas metal arc welding parameters based on artificial neural networks. Mater Des 28:2015–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim YS (1989) Metal transfer in gas metal arc welding. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts ins Technol, USA

  34. Lopes GT (2006) Arc-based sensing in narrow groove pipe welding. Ph.D. Thesis. Sch Ind Manuf Sci, Cranfield Univ, GB

  35. Deyu T (2006) Application and development of automatic welding equipment of long pipeline. Mod Weld 4:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  36. Naidu DS, Ozcelik A, Moore KL (2003) Modeling, sensing and control of gas metal arc welding. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  37. Doodman Tipi AR, Mortazavi SA (2008) A new adaptive method (AF-PID) presentation with implementation in the automatic welding robot. In: IEEE/ASME Int Conf Mechat Embed Sys Appl (MESA08), Beijing, China

  38. Doodman Tipi AR (2008) Adaptation of dynamic matrix control and its implementation on welding robot. In: IEEE/ASME Int Conf Mechat Embed Sys Appl (MESA08), Beijing, China

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Doodman Tipi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tipi, A.D. Neutralizing the effect of the angle variations on the drop detachment in automatic GMAW system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54, 123–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2912-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2912-z

Keywords

Navigation