Skip to main content
Log in

An integrating approach to root cause analysis of a bivariate mean vector with a linear trend disturbance

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying the change point or the starting time of a disturbance in a process can play an essential role in root cause analysis. Although, in univariate environment, change point identification by itself could be a significant step in process improvement but in multivariate environment without conducting diagnostic analysis which leads to the identification of the variable(s) responsible for the change in the process, one cannot effectively perform root cause analysis. In this paper, a supervised learning approach based on artificial neural networks is proposed which helps to identify the change point in a bivariate environment when the process mean vector is allowed to shift linearly and simultaneously a diagnostic analysis is conducted to identify the variable(s) responsible for the change in the process mean vector. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that this problem is addressed in the literature of change point estimation. The performance of the proposed model is investigated through several numerical examples. Results indicate that the proposed model provides practitioners with a very accurate estimate of the change point in the process mean vector and simultaneously helps to identify the variable(s) responsible with the out-of-control condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samuel TR, JR PJJ, Calvin JA (1998) Identifying the time of a step change with XBar control charts. J Qual Eng 10(3):521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pignatiello JJ Jr, Samuel TR (2001) Identifying the time of a step change in the process fraction nonconforming. Qual Eng 13(3):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. JR PJJ, Samuel TR (2001) Estimation of the change point of a normal process mean in SPC applications. J Qual Technol 33(1):82–95

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hawkins DM, Qiu P (2003) The changepoint model for statistical process control. J Qual Technol 35(4):355–366

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perry MB, JR PJJ (2006) Estimation of the change point of a normal process mean with a linear trend disturbance. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 3(3):325–334

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry MB, JR PJJ, Simpson JR (2007) Estimation of the change point of the process fraction nonconforming with a monotonic change disturbance in SPC. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(3):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gazanfari M, Alaeddini A, Niaki STA, Aryanezhad MB (2008) A clustering approach to identify the time of a step change in Shewhart control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int 24(7):765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noorossana R, Shademan A (2009) Estimating the change point of a normal process mean with a monotonic change. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noorossana R, Saghaei A, Paynabar K, Abdi S (2009) Identifying the period of a step change in high-yield processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1007

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nedumaran G, JR PJJ, Calvin JA (2000) Identifying the time of a step-change with χ 2 control charts. Qual Eng 13(2):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chua MK, Montgomery DC (1992) Investigation and characterization of a control scheme for multivariate quality control. Qual Reliab Eng Int 8(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wade MR, Woodall WH (1993) A review and analysis of cause-selecting control charts. J Qual Technol 25(3):161–170

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkins DM (1993) Regression adjustment for variables in multivariate quality control. J Qual Technol 25(3):170–182

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hayter AJ, Tsui KL (1994) Identification and quantification in multivariate quality control problems. J Qual Technol 26(3):197–208

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mason RL, Tracy ND, Young JC (1995) Decomposition of T 2 for multivariate control chart interpretation. J Qual Technol 27(2):99–108

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kourti T, MacGregor JF (1996) Multivariate SPC methods for process and product monitoring. J Qual Technol 28(4):409–428

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mason RL, Tracy ND, Young JC (1997) A practical approach for interpreting multivariate T 2 control chart signals. J Qual Technol 29(4):396–406

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nottingham QJ, Cook DF, Zobel CW (2001) Visualization of multivariate data with radial plots using SAS. Comput Ind Eng 41(1):17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maravelakis PE, Bersimis S, Panaretos J, Psarakis S (2002) On identifying the out of control variable in a multivariate control chart. Communications in Statistics. Theory Methods 31(12):2391–2408

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2005) Fault diagnosis in multivariate control charts using artificial neural network. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21(8):825–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guh RS (2007) On-line identification and quantification of mean shifts in bivariate processes using a neural network-based approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(3):367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwarng HB (2008) Toward identifying the source of mean shifts in multivariate SPC: a neural network approach. Int J Prod Res 46(20):5531–5559

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bersimis S, Psarakis S, Panaretos J (2007) Multivariate statistical process control chart: an overview. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(5):517–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guh RS, Shiue YR (2008) An effective application of decision tree learning for on-line detection of mean shifts in multivariate control charts. Comp Indust Eng 55(2):475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ken N (1992) A comparison of control charts from the viewpoint of change-point estimation. Qual Reliab Eng Int 8(6):537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullivan JH, Woodall WH (2000) Change-point detection of mean vector or covariance matrix shifts using multivariate individual observation. IIE Trans 32(6):537–549

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li F, Runger GC, Tun E (2006) Supervised learning for change-point detection. Int J Prod Res 44(14):2853–2868

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Hawkins DM, Zamba KD (2006) A multivariate change point model for statistical process control. Technometrics 48(4):539–549

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hwarng HB (2004) Detecting process mean shift in the presence of autocorrelation: a neural network based monitoring scheme. Int J Prod Res 42(3):573–595

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hwarng HB (2005) Simultaneous identification of mean shift and correlation change in AR(1) processes. Int J Prod Res 43(9):1761–1783

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Zorriassatine F, Tannock JDT (1998) A review of neural networks for statistical process control. J Intell Manuf 9(3):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Atashgar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atashgar, K., Noorossana, R. An integrating approach to root cause analysis of a bivariate mean vector with a linear trend disturbance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52, 407–420 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2728-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2728-x

Keywords

Navigation