Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Injection molding optimization with weld line design constraint using distributed multi-population genetic algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weld lines not only detract from an injection-molded part’s surface quality, but also significantly reduce its mechanical strength. It is not always easy to completely eliminate weld lines by simply adjusting the relevant injection mold design or the molding conditions. One solution is to prevent the weld lines from forming in regions that are structurally or aesthetically sensitive. The influence of weld lines on the quality of injection-molded parts cannot be overlooked and weld lines should be regarded as an important design constraint, especially for parts with aesthetic concerns. Since precisely predicting the number of weld lines and their positions and lengths is difficult without executing simulation routines, especially when part geometry is considered a design variable, this study adopts an enhanced genetic algorithm, referred to as distributed multi-population genetic algorithm (DMPGA), combining an optimization algorithm and commercial MoldFlow software with a dominance-based constraint-handling technique and a master–slave distributed architecture. MoldFlow obtains relevant data regarding warpage and weld lines and evaluates the corresponding designs. The dominance-based constraint-handling technique handles the weld line design constraint without needing additional penalty factors. Finally, the master–slave distributed architecture reduces the formidable computational time required for injection molding optimization. To illustrate the high viability of DMPGA, this study provides an outer frame of a digital photo frame as an optimization example. The results of this study show that DMPGA cannot only effectively decrease maximum part warpage without violating the weld line constraint, but also conquer hurdles attributed to constraint handling and computational demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gao Y, Wang X (2008) An effective warpage optimization method in injection molding based on the Kriging model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:953–960

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurtaran H, Erzurumlu T (2006) Efficient warpage optimization of thin shell plastic parts using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Int Adv Manuf Technol 27(5–6):468–472

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee BH, Kim BH (1995) Optimization of part wall thicknesses to reduce warpage of injection-molded parts based on the modified complex method. Polym Plast Technol Eng 34(5):793–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozcelik B, Erzurumlu T (2006) Comparison of the warpage optimization in the plastic injection molding using ANOVA, neural network model and genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 171:437–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu SJ, Wu JY, Chang JH, Hung SW (2000) An experimental matrix design to optimize the weldline strength in injection molded parts. Polym Eng Sci 40(5):1256–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee BH, Kim BH (1995) Automated selection of gate location based on desired quality of injection molded part. Polym Plast Technol Eng 35(2):253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhai M, Lam YC, Au CK (2006) Runner sizing and weld line positioning for plastics injection moulding with multiple gates. Eng Comput 21:218–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng YM, Britton GA, Lam YC (2006) Towards automatic shape modification in injection-moulded-plastic-part design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng YM, Lam YC, Britton GA (2004) Optimisation of injection moulding conditions with user-definable objective functions based on a genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 42(7):35–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lam YC, Deng Y-M, Au CK (2006) A GA/gradient hybrid approach for injection moulding conditions optimisation. Eng Comput 21(3):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandelidis I, Zou Q (1990) Optimization of injection molding design. Part II: molding conditions optimization. Polym Eng Sci 30(15):883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou J, Turng LS (2007) Process optimization of injection molding using an adaptative surrogate model with gaussian process apptoach. Polym Eng Sci 47(5):684–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng YM, Zheng D, Lu XJ (2008) Injection moulding optimization of multi-class design variables using a PSO algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:690–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deb K (2000) An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 186:311–338

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lam YC, Zhai LY, Tai K, Fok SC (2004) An evolutionary approach for cooling system optimization in plastic injection moulding. Int J Prod Res 42(10):2047–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Potts JC, Giddens TD, Yadav SB (1994) The development and evaluation of an improved genetic algorithm based on migration and artificial selection. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(1):73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mera NS, Elliott L, Ingham DB (2004) A multi-population genetic algorithm approach for solving ill-posed problems. Comput Mech 33:254–262

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen XF, Gui WH, Cen LH, Hu ZK (2004) A multi-population genetic algorithm based on chaotic migration strategy and its application to inventory programming. Proceedings of the WCICA 3:2159–2162

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen L, Chang FJ (2007) Applying a real-coded multi-population genetic algorithm to multi-reservoir operation. Hydrol Process 21:688–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cantú-Paz E (1998) A survey of parallel genetic algorithms. Calculateurs Parallèles, Réseaux et Systèmes Répartis 10(2):141–171

    Google Scholar 

  22. MoldFlow Corporation (2004) MoldFlow plastic insight 5.0. Moldflow Corporation, Wayland, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Chiang Ku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CY., Ku, CC. & Pai, HY. Injection molding optimization with weld line design constraint using distributed multi-population genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52, 131–141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2719-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2719-y

Keywords

Navigation