Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Machining fixture layout design using ant colony algorithm based continuous optimization method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In any machining fixture, the workpiece elastic deformation caused during machining influences the dimensional and form errors of the workpiece. Placing each locator and clamp in an optimal place can minimize the elastic deformation of the workpiece, which in turn minimizes the dimensional and form errors of the workpiece. Design of fixture configuration (layout) is a procedure to establish the workpiece–fixture contact through optimal positioning of clamping and locating elements. In this paper, an ant colony algorithm (ACA) based discrete and continuous optimization methods are applied for optimizing the machining fixture layout so that the workpiece elastic deformation is minimized. The finite element method (FEM) is used for determining the dynamic response of the workpiece caused due to machining and clamping forces. The dynamic response of the workpiece is simulated for all ACA runs. This paper proves that the ACA-based continuous fixture layout optimization method exhibits the better results than that of ACA-based discrete fixture layout optimization method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bausch J, Youcef-Toumi K (1990) Kinematic methods for automated fixture reconfiguration planning IEEE International conference on robotics and automation 1396–140

  2. Menassa RJ, Devries WA (1990) Design synthesis and optimization method for fixtures with compliant elements. In Proc ASME WAM Dallas TX PED 47:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mani M, Wilson WRD (1988) Automated design of work holding fixtures using kinematic constraint synthesis. Proceeding of the 16th North American Manufacturing Research Conference (NAMRC), 437–444.

  4. Lee JD, Haynes LS (1987) Finite element analysis of flexible system. ASME J Eng Ind 109(2):134–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Menassa RJ, Devries WR (1991) Optimization methods applied to selecting support positions in fixture design. ASME J Eng Ind 113:412–418

    Google Scholar 

  6. King LS, Hutter I (1993) Theoretical approach for generating optimal fixturing locations for prismatic work parts in automated assembly. J Manufact Syst 12(5):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kashyap R, DeVries WR (1999) Finite element analysis and optimization in fixture design. Struct Optim 18:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kang YZ, Rong YM, Yang JC (2003) Computer-aided fixture verification, Part 2—Tolerance analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:836–884. doi:10.1007/s00170-002-1400-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demeter EC (1998) Fast support layout optimization. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(10):1221–1239. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00127-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li B, Melkote SN (2001) Fixture clamping force optimization and its impact on workpiece location accuracy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(2):104–113. doi:10.1007/s001700170198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanchez HT, Estrems M, Faura F (2005) Fixturing analysis methods for calculating the contact load distribution and the valid clamping regions in machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(10):701–707 18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kokkolaras Zhijun Li Michael, Izquierdo LE, Jack Hu S, Papalambros PY (2006) “Multiobjective optimization for integrated tolerance allocation and fixture layout design in multistation assembly, ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference September 10–13. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deng HY, Melkote SN (2006) Determination of minimum clamping forces for dynamically stable fixturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7–8):847–857. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan EYT, Kumar AS, Fuh JYH, Nee AYC (2004) Modeling, analysis and verification of optimal fixturing design. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 1(2):121–132. doi:10.1109/TASE.2004.835601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai XM, Luo LJ, Lin ZQ (2004) Flexible assembly fixture layout modeling and optimization based on genetic algorithm. Chin J Mech Eng 1:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamedi M (2005) Intelligent fixture design through a hybrid system of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 23(3):295–311. doi:10.1007/s10462-004-7187-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishnakumar K, Melkote SN (2000) Machining fixture layout optimization. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:579–598. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00072-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnakumar K, Satyanarayana S, Melkote SN (2002) Iterative fixture layout and clamping force optimization using the genetic algorithm. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(1):119–125. doi:10.1115/1.1414127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin GH et al (2006) Developed a mathematical approach to analysis and optimal design of a fixture locating scheme. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:349–359. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-2509-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prabhaharan G, Padmanaban KP, Asokan S (2006) Dynamic analysis on optimal placement of fixturing elements accounting for the effect of workpiece elasticity. Int J Manuf Sci Technol 8(1):33–51

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vallapuzha S, De Meter EC, Choudhuri S, Khetan RP (2002) An investigation into the use of spatial coordinates for the genetic algorithm based solution of the fixture layout optimization problem. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 42:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaya N (2005) Machining fixture locating and clamping position optimization using genetic algorithms. Int J Comput Ind 57:112–120. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcelin JL (2001) Genetic search applied to selecting support positions in machining of mechanical parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:344–347. doi:10.1007/s001700170169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dorigo M, Gamberdella LM (1997) Ant Colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):53–66. doi:10.1109/4235.585892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patrick R, Mcmullan PR (2001) An Ant Colony Optimization approach to address a JIT sequencing problem with multiple objective. Artif Intell Eng 15:309–317. doi:10.1016/S0954-1810(01)00004-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jayaraman VK, Kulkarni BD, Karale S, Shalokar P (2000) Ant Colony framework for optimal design and scheduling of batch plants. Comput Chem Eng 24:1901–1910. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00592-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prabhaharan G, Muruganandam A, Asokan P, Girish BS (2005) Machine cell formation for cellular manufacturing systems using an ant colony system approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:1013–1019. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1927-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prabhaharan G, Asokan P, Rajendran S (2005) Sensitivity-based conceptual design and tolerance allocation using the continuous ants colony algorithm (CACO). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:516–526. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1846-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prabhaharan G, Padmanaban KP (2007) Machining fixture layout optimization using FEM and evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(11–12):1090–1103. doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0441-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Padmanaban KP, Prabhaharan G (2008) Dynamic analysis on optimal placement of fixturing elements using evolutionary techniques. Int J Prod Res 46:4177–4214. doi:10.1080/00207540601147297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Rao PN (2000) Manufacturing and technology (Metal Cutting and Machine tools). McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India

    K. P. Padmanaban

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, KONGU Engineering College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India

    K. P. Arulshri

  3. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Caledonian College of Engineering, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

    G. Prabhakaran

Authors
  1. K. P. Padmanaban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. P. Arulshri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Prabhakaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. Padmanaban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padmanaban, K.P., Arulshri, K.P. & Prabhakaran, G. Machining fixture layout design using ant colony algorithm based continuous optimization method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45, 922–934 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2035-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2035-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation