Skip to main content
Log in

A two-machine flowshop maximum tardiness scheduling problem with a learning effect

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to study a two-machine flowshop scheduling problem with a learning effect where the goal is to find a sequence that minimizes the maximum tardiness. We employ a branch-and-bound method and a simulated annealing (SA) method to search for the optimal solution and a near-optimal solution, respectively. Computational results, using Fisher’s (Math Program 11:229–251 1971) framework, show that the mean and maximum number of nodes for the branch-and-bound algorithm decrease when the learning effect is stronger, the value of the tardiness factor is smaller, or the value of the due date range is larger. In addition, comparisons between the SA method and the earliest due date first (EDD) rule are provided for large-job sizes. Results indicate that the percentage of time that the SA solution outperforms the EDD solution decreases as the job size increases and the learning effect becomes greater. Additionally, the SA solution is never worse than the EDD solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biskup D (1999) Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations. Eur J Oper Res 115:173–178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng TCE, Wang G (2000) Single machine scheduling with learning effect considerations. Ann Oper Res 98:273–290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dileepan P, Sen T (1988) Bicriterion static scheduling research for a single machine. Omega 16:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dondeti VR, Mohanty BB (1998) Impact of learning and fatigue factors on single machine scheduling with penalties for tardy jobs. Eur J Oper Res 105:509–524

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher ML (1971) A dual algorithm for the one-machine scheduling problem. Math Program 11:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gawiejnowicz S (1996) A note on scheduling on a single processor with speed dependent on a number of executed jobs. Inf Process Lett 56:297–300

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Heiser J, Render B (1999) Operations management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  8. Kirkpatrick S, Gellat CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing algorithm. Science 220:671–680

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koulamas C, Antony SR, Jean R (1994) A survey of simulated annealing applications to operations research problems. Omega 22:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee WC, Wu CC (2004) Minimizing total completion time in a two-machine flowshop with a learning effect. Int J Prod Econ 88:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee WC, Wu CC, Sung HJ (2004) A bi-criterion single-machine scheduling problem with learning considerations. Acta Informatica 40:303–315

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenstra JK, Rinnooy AHG, Brucker P (1977) Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Annal Dis Math 1:1016-1019

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meilijson I, Tamir A (1984) Minimizing flow time on parallel identical processors with variable unit processing time. Oper Res 32:440–448

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosheiov G (2001a) Scheduling problems with a learning effect. Eur J Oper Res 132:687–693

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosheiov G (2001b) Parallel machine scheduling with a learning effect. J Oper Res Soc 52:1165–1169

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mosheiov G, Sidney J (2003) Scheduling with general job-dependent learning curves. Eur J Oper Res 147:665–670

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagar A, Haddack J, Heragu S (1995) Multiple and bicriteria scheduling: a literature survey. Eur J Oper Res 81:88–104

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Russell R, Taylor BW III (2000) Operations management: multimedia version. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  19. Wright TP (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3:122–128

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yelle LE (1979) The learning curve: historical review and comprehensive survey. Decis Sci 10:302–328

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Chia Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CC., Lee, WC. & Wang, WC. A two-machine flowshop maximum tardiness scheduling problem with a learning effect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31, 743–750 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0255-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0255-y

Keywords

Navigation