Skip to main content
Log in

Production-flow-value-based job dispatching method for semiconductor manufacturing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a wafer manufacturing system, the value added to a particular product at a station may differ significantly from that added to a different product at the same station. If an enterprise concentrates mainly on generating profits, throughput becomes a poor performance measurement for a manufacturing system. Job dispatching rules based on maximum throughput no longer guarantee maximizing profit. Hence, profitability would be a good alternative measurement. The main purpose of this study is to develop a production-flow-value-based job dispatching rule (PFV) by the theory of constraints (TOC) for wafer fabrication. This study derives a TOC cost estimation method and a profitability estimate of a WIP-wafer lot. Jobs are then prioritized based on their profitability. Thus the PFV job dispatching rule is developed. For comparison, two job dispatching rules, MCR and MBS, are also arbitrarily selected to perform simulations. The simulation results reveal that the proposed PFV maximizes the production flow value, while MCR and MBS do not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blackstone JH, Philips DT, Hogg GL (1982) A state-of-the-srt survey of dispatching rules for manufacturing job shop operations. Int J Prod Res 20(1):27–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Panwalkar SS, Iskander W (1997) A survey of scheduling rules. Oper Res 25(1):45–61

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Uzsoy R, Lee CY, Martin-Vega, LA (1992) A review of production planning and scheduling models in the semiconductor industry. Part I: System characteristics, performances evaluation and production planning. IIE Trans 24(4):47–58

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Uzsoy R, Lee CY, Martin-Vega LA (1994) A review of production planning and scheduling models in the semiconductor industry. Part II: Shop-floor control. IIE Trans 26(5):44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce NG, Yurtsever T (2000) Value-based dispatching for semiconductor wafer fabrication - VBD. IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, 12–14 Sept 2000

  6. Lewis RJ (1995) Activity-based models for cost management systems. Quorum Books, Westport, CN

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kee R, Schmidt C (2000) A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions. Int J Prod Econ 63:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunasekaran A, Sarhadi M (1998) Implementation of activity-based costing in manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boons NAM (1998) Product costing for complex manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Econ 55:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldratt EM (1993) What is the theory of constraints? APICS-The Perform Advant 3:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blackstone JH (2001) Theory of constraints - a status report. Int J Prod Res 39(6):1053–1080

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lockamy A, Spencer MS (1998) Performance measurement in a theory of constraints environment. Int J Prod Res 36(8):2045–2060

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fredendall LD, Lea BR (1997) Improving the product mix heuristic in the theory of constraints. Int J Prod Res 35(6):1535–1544

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu T-C, Chung S-H (1998) The TOC-based algorithm for solving product mix problems. Prod Plan Control 9(1):36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker KR (1974) Introduction to sequencing and scheduling, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baudin M (1990) Manufacturing systems analysis with application to production scheduling, Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glassey CR, Resende MGC (1988) Closed-loop job release control for VLSI circuit manufacturing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 1(1):36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lozinski C, Glassey CR (1988) Bottleneck starvation indicators for shop-floor control. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 1(4):147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikura Y, Gimple M (1989) Efficient scheduling algorithms for a single batch processing machine. Oper Res Lett 5(2):61–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Glassey CR, Weng W (1991) Dynamic batching heuristic for simultaneous processing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 4(2):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fowler JW, Phillips DT, Hogg GL (1992) Real-time control of multiproduct bulk service semiconductor manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 5:158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weng WW, Leachman RC (1993) An improved methodology for real-time production decisions at batch-process workstation. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 6(3):219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson JK, Fowler JW, Bard JF (1995) The use of upstream and downstream information in scheduling semiconductor batch operation. Int J Prod Res 33(8):1849–1869

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Der Zee DJ,Van Harten A, Schuur PC (1997) Dynamic job assignment heuristic formulti-server batch operations-a cost based approach. Int J Prod Res 35(11):3063–3093

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC90-2212-E-002-210.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhua Hsieh.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Table 3 Table 4

Table 2 Machine data (MTBF and MTTR represent mean time between failure and mean time to repair, both are exponential distributions)
Table 3 A 61-step product recipe used in the study (We assume all the process times are constant)
Table 4 The average cycle times for the three dispatching rules from the simulation results (Note the standard deviations for all of the results are between 0.003∼0.006days.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsieh, S., Hou, KC. Production-flow-value-based job dispatching method for semiconductor manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30, 727–737 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0105-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0105-y

Keywords

Navigation