Skip to main content
Log in

Generation of assembly models from kinematic constraints

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new joint-based assembly modeling method. In joint-based assembly modeling, the assembly constraints are specified on the components, but not on the geometric elements of the components. The proposed method generates assembly models from kinematic joint constraints by applying three procedures (1) to extract all feasible JMFs (Joint Mating Feature) for each mating component using information on joint constraints, (2) to derive mating alternatives for each pair of mating components after reducing the number of JMFs using the pruning criteria, and (3) to generate an assembly model by choosing the intended one from the mating alternatives for each pair of mating components and solving the JMF constraints. Since the joint constraints are expressed in terms of the relations between components rather than relations between geometric elements, the proposed method is more intuitive and natural for assembly modeling and supports modeling activities effectively by minimizing user interactions. By using joint mating constraints for assembly modeling, moreover, the kinematic behaviors of assemblies determined in the conceptual design stage can be directly applied and consistently maintained up to the detailed design stage. In the proposed method, it is also not necessary to re-input the mating constraints even when the component topology is changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bedworth D, Henderson M, Wolfe P (1991) Computer-integrated design and manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New York

  2. Noort A, Hoek G, Bronsvoort W (2002) Integrating part and assembly modeling. Comput Aided Des ign 34(12):899–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim J, Kim K, Lee J, Choi K (2000) Solving 3D geometric constraints for assembly modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16(11):843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holland W (1998) Assembly features in modeling and planning. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology

  5. SolidWorks Corporation (2002) SolidWorks user’s manual

  6. Kramer GA (1992) Solving geometric constraint system: a case study in kinematics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oliver JH, Harangozo MJ (1992) Inference of link positions for planar closed-loop mechanisms. Comput Aided Des 24(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitney D, Mantripragada R, Adams J, Rhee S (1999) Designing assemblies. Res Eng Des 11(4):229–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MSC Software (2002) Working model user’s manual

  10. Craig J (1989) Introduction to robotics. Addison-Wesley, Boston

  11. Nnaji B, Liu H (1990) Feature reasoning for automatic robotic assembly and machining in polyhedral representation. Int J Prod Res 28(3):517–540

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim J, Kim K, Lee J, Jung H (2004) Solving 3D geometric constraints for closed-loop assemblies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(9):755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to KwangSoo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J., Kim, K., Lee, J. et al. Generation of assembly models from kinematic constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 131–137 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2231-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2231-3

Keywords

Navigation