Abstract
Platform-based product family design is an effective means for mass customization. Platform commonization is one of the key problems in developing product platforms. Through discussion on the relevant problems of platform commonization, this article presents a framework of layered constructing platform architecture to improve commonality of platforms. Subsequently, an approach to capturing platform elements, viz. Graph theory-based clustering analysis (GTBCA), is proposed, which illustrates the construction of platforms through analyzing the commonality and standardization on a set of existing similar products of a company. The method can be used to help designers plan and design product platform rationally and develop a product family effectively for mass customization. In the end, a case study of a pumping unit product family is presented to illustrate the feasibility and validity of the approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meyer MH (1997) Revitalize your product lines through continuous platform renewal. Res Technol Manage 40:17–28
Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Bus Rev 70:67-83
Siddique Z, Rosen WD (1999) Product platform design: a graph grammar approach. 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, paper no. DETC97/DTM-8762, pp 1–12
Pedersen K, Allen JK, Mistree F (1998) On evolution and engineering systems development. 42nd annual conference of the international society for the systems sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, 1998
Ishii K, Juengel C, Eubanks F (1995) Design for product variety: key to product line structuring. 1995 ASME design theory and methodology conference, Boston, Massachusetts, pp 499–506
Erens F, Verhulst K (1997) Architectures for product families. Comp Indust 33:165–178
Simpson TW, Maier JRA, Mistree F (1999) A product platform concept exploration method for product family design. 1999 ASME design engineering technical conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, paper no. DETC99/DTM-8761, pp 1–12
Conner CG, DeKroon JF, Mistree F (1999) A product variety tradeoff evaluation method for a family of cordless drill transmissions. 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, paper no. DETC99/DAC-8625, pp 1–12
Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN (2000) Modular platform-based product family design. 2000 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Baltimore, Maryland, paper no. DETC00/DAC-14238, pp 1–11
Stadzisz PC, Henrioud JM (1995) Integrated design of product families and assembly systems. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan 2:1290–1295
Sanderson S, Uzumeri M (1995). Managing product families: the case of the Sony Walkman. Res Policy 24:761–782
Pessina MW, Renner JR (1998) Mass customization at Lutron Electronics–a total company process. Agility Global Compet 2:50–57
Xiao WS (1993) Graph theory and arithmetic. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing
Wu YJ, Liu ZJ (1994) Pumping unit. Oil Industry Press, Beijing
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, H., Zhong, Y., Xiao, R. et al. Product platform commonization: platform construction and platform elements capture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25, 1071–1077 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1965-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1965-7