Abstract
In this paper, we are interested in industrial and territorial ecology (ITE), whose aim is to optimize the management of material and energy flows between local economic players by drawing inspiration from the cyclical nature of natural ecosystems. The organizational elements, specifically the forms of coordination between actors, appear to be central in the setting out of these processes. This is why methodological devices promise to respond to the chronic difficulty of implementing local inter-firm relations conducive to cooperation. The work presented here, based on social network analysis, aims to determine their validity through three case studies. First, we examine the need to consider the spatial dimension of ITE approaches to understand the conditions for the emergence of inter-firm cooperation and sustainable development, and we present the methodological elements of our work. Then, we proceed to the case studies and identify inter-firm relations and study their evolution over time. We conclude with an assessment of the devices studied, the intermediary role of facilitators, and the difficulty of perpetuating these types of cooperative relations, which raises serious questions about the modalities of the implementation of sustainable territorial development processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Examples of synergies noted in our surveys may have concerned the pooling of IT equipment or the recovery of wooden drums, white and printed paper, cardboard and plastic film, or IT equipment.
Geographical data from the official website of the Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Nord Isère (2016).
For Ingénierie Technique et Environnementale (Technical and Environmental Engineering).
Schéma de Cohérence Territoriale des Rives du Rhône (2012). An urbanism document about regional planification.
Panorama économique de Cornouaille, Chambers of Commerce and Industry of CCI Quimper Cornouaille (2015). Official report on local economic activities.
Initially, we had planned to carry out two periods of interviews per case study, a first occurring three to four months after the workshop and a second twelve months after it. However, we were not allowed to speak with the firms in the first few months. Therefore, we made the choice to favor the second interview period by slightly readjusting the questions to bring out the diachronic aspect of the relationships.
References
Allenby BR (1999) Culture and industrial ecology. J Ind Ecol 3(1):2–4
Ashton WS (2008) Understanding the organization of industrial ecosystems - a social network approach. J Ind Ecol 12:34–51
Ashton WS, Bain AC (2012) Assessing the “short mental distance” in eco-industrial networks. J Ind Ecol 16:70–82
Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York
Baas LW, Huisingh D (2008) The synergistic role of embeddedness and capabilities in industrial symbiosis: illustration based upon 12 years of experiences in the Rotterdam Harbour and Industry Complex. Prog Ind Ecol 5:399–421
Baldassarre B, Schepers M, Bocken N, Cuppen E, Korevaar G, Calabretta G (2019) Industrial Symbiosis: towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating circular economy and industrial Ecology perspectives. J Clean Prod 216:448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.091
Beauchamp MA (1965) An improved index of centrality. Behav Sci 10:161–163
Bocken N, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Clean Prod 65:42–56
Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Soc 2(1):113–120
Boons F, Baas W (1997) Types of industrial ecology: the problem of coordination. J Cleaner Prod 5(1–2):79–86
Boons F, Howard-Grenville JA (2009) The social embeddedness of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Borgatti SP (2002) A statistical method for comparing aggregate data across a priori groups. Field Methods 14(1):88–107
Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation a critical assessment. Regional Stud 39:61–74
Boulding KE (1966) The economics of coming spaceship earth. In: Jarret H (ed) Environmental quality in a growing economy. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Bourdin S, Nadou F (2020) The role of a local authority as a stakeholder encouraging the development of biogas: a study on territorial intermediation. J Environ Manag 258:110009
Bourdin S, Torre A (2020) The circular economy as a means of territorialisation of European industry. Symphonya Emerg Issues Manag. https://doi.org/10.4468/2020.2.04BOURDIN.TORRE
Brandes U (2001) A faster algorithm for betweeness centrality. J Math Sociol 25(2):163–177
CCI Nord Isère (2016) Présentation géographique. En ligne. https://www.ccinordisere.fr/193-presentation-geographique.htm (consulté le 1 décembre 2017)
CCI Quimper Cornouaille (2015) Panorama économique de Cornouaille. Rapport, édition 2015, CCI Quimper Cornouaille, 40 p
Cerceau J (2013) L’écologie industrielle comme processus de construction territoriale: application aux espaces portuaires. Thèse de doctorat, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne, Alès, 357 p
Cerceau J, Mat N, Junqua G (2018) Territorial embeddedness of natural resource management: a perspective through the implementation of Industrial Ecology. Geoforum 89:29–42
Chertow M, Ehrenfeld J (2012) Organizing self-organizing systems. J Ind Ecol 16:13–27
Contractor FJ, Lorange P (1988) Why should firms cooperate. In: Contractor FJ, Lorange P (eds) Cooperative strategies in International business. Lexington Books, MA., pp 3–29
Ehrenfeld J (1997) Industrial Ecology: a framework for product and process design. J Clean Prod 5(1–2):87–95
Ehrenfeld J, Gertler N (1997) Industrial ecology in practice: the evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. J Ind Ecol 1:67–79
Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239
Gallaud D, Torre A (2004) Geographical proximity and circulation of knowledge through inter-firm cooperation. In: Wink R (ed) Academia-business links. Macmillan, London
Gertler N (1995) Industry ecosystems: developing sustainable industrial structures. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 141 p
Gibbs D (2003) Trust and networking in inter-firm relations: the case of eco-industrial development. Local Econ 18:222–236
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380
Grant GB, Seager TP, Massard G, Nies L (2010) Information and communication technology for industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 15(5):740–753
Gregson N, Crang M, Fuller S, Holmes H (2015) Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Econ Soc 44(2):218–243
Grossetti M, Barthe J-F, Chauvac N (2011) Studying relational chains from narrative material. Bulletin Soc Methodol 110:11–25
Harary F, Norman RZ, Cartwright D (1965) Structural models: an introduction to the theory of directed graphs. Wiley, New York, p 415
Hewes A, Lyons D (2008) The humanistic side of eco-industrial parks: champions and the role of trust. Reg Stud 42:1329–1342
Hobson K, Lynch N, Lilley D, Smalley G (2018) Systems of practice and the circular economy: transforming mobile phone product service systems. Environ Innov Soc Transitions 26:147–157
IPCC (2019). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [PR Shukla, J Skea, E Calvo Buendia, V Masson-Delmotte, H-O Pörtner, DC Roberts, P Zhai, R Slade, S Connors, R van Diemen, M Ferrat, E Haughey, S Luz, S Neogi, M Pathak, J Petzold, J Portugal Pereira, P Vyas, E Huntley, K Kissick, M Belkacemi, J Malley, (eds.)]
Jacobsen NB, Anderberg S (2009) Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiotic networks the case of Kalundborg. In: Boons F, Howard-Grenville JA (eds) The social embeddedness of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Jambou M (2016) L’émergence de relations interentreprises dans les démarches d’écologie industrielle et territoriale. Université de technologie de Troyes, Troyes, Thèse de doctorat, p 404
Kasmi F (2020) Industrial symbiosis and territorial development: the cross-fertilization of proximity dynamics and the role of information and knowledge flows. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00631-7
Korhonen J (2001) Four ecosystem principles for an industrial ecosystem. J Clean Prod 9(3):253–259
Lazega E, Snijders TAB (dir.) (2015) Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences. Theory, Methods and Applications, Heidelberg, Springer, coll. « Methodos », 375p
Lazega E, Snijders TA (eds) (2015) Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences: theory, methods and applications, Springer 371p
Levi-Strauss C (1969) The elementary structures of Kinship. Beacon Press, USA
Lorrain F, White HC (1971) Structural equivalence of individual in social networks. J Math Sociol 1:49–80
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Current state and trends assessment. Island Press, Washington D.C.
Mirata M (2005) Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges. J Cleaner Prod 12:967–983
Mirata M, Emtairah T (2005) Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: the case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme. J Clean Prod 13:993–1002
Moreno JL (1934) Who shall survive?: foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy, and sociodrama, Beacon House
Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167–256
Nooteboom B, Wuyst S, Colombo MG, Duta S (2005) Empirical test of optimal cognitive distance. J Econ Behav Organ 58:277–302
Paquin RL, Howard-Grenville J (2012) The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 16:83–93
Patala S, Salmi A, Bocken N (2020) Intermediation dilemmas in facilitated industrial symbiosis. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121093
Polge E, Torre A (2018) Territorial governance and proximity dynamics. The case of two public policy arrangements in the Brazilian Amazon. Pap Reg Sci 97(4):909–929
Radicic D, Pugh G, Douglas D (2020) Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Bus Econ 54:257–283
Simmel J (1917) Grundfragen der Soziologie, Berlin: Göschen, [Fundamental Questions of Sociology]
Torre A, Polge E, Wallet F (2019) Proximities and the role of relational networks in innovation: the case of the dairy industry in two villages of the “green municipality” of Paragominas in the Eastern Amazon. Reg Sci Policy Pract 11(2):279–294
Torre A, Dermine-Brullot S (2021) The circular economy, solution for a sustainable territorial development? Indian J Regional Sci (forthcoming)
Uusikartano J, Vayrynen H, Aarikka-Stenroos L (2021) Public actors and their diverse roles in eco-industrial parks: a multiple-case study. J Clean Prod 296:126463
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 857
White HC, Boorman SA, Breiger RL (1976) Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am J Sociol 81:730–780
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Location of the three case studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jambou, M., Torre, A., Dermine-Brullot, S. et al. Inter-firm cooperation and local industrial ecology processes: evidence from three French case studies. Ann Reg Sci 68, 331–358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01088-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01088-5