Skip to main content
Log in

Political yardstick competition among Italian municipalities on spending decisions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the presence of political yardstick competition on current spending decisions in a sample of Italian municipalities. We find significant evidence of yardstick competition when we explicitly account for the domestic stability pact (DSP), a fiscal rule introduced to limit the budget deficit of local administrations. First, we estimate a static specification of a spatial panel model, and then we check for the robustness of our results with a dynamic specification. The static analysis shows that municipalities engage in yardstick competition during pre-election years, regardless of whether they are subject to the DSP or not. The dynamic analysis shows that the yardstick hypothesis remains robust only for municipalities not constrained by the DSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allers M, Elhorst JP (2005) Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands. Int Tax Public Finance 12: 493–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1981) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J Am Stat Assoc 76(375): 598–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J Econometr 18(1): 47–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2): 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econometr 68(1): 29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baicker K (2005) The spillover effects of the state spending. J Public Econ 89: 529–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata J 3:1–31. Working Paper 545, Boston College

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Case A (1995) Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax setting, and yardstick competition. Am Econ Rev 85: 25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econometr 87(1): 115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (2000) Gmm estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econometr Rev 19(3): 321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond SR, Hoeffler A, Temple J (2001) Gmm estimation of empirical growth models. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3048

  • Bordignon M, Cerniglia F, Revelli F (2003) In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. J Urban Econ 54(2): 199–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowsher CG (2002) On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Econ Lett 77(2): 211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1980) The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2003) Strategic interaction among Governments: an overview of empirical studies. Int Reg Sci Rev 26: 175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case A (1993) Interstate tax competition after tra86. J Policy Anal Manage 12(1): 136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case A, Hines JR, Rosen HS (1993) Budget spill-over and fiscal policy interdependence—evidence from the States. J Public Econ 52: 258–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux MP, Lockwood B, Redoano M (2007) Horizontal and vertical indirect tax competition: theory and some evidence from the USA. J Public Econ 91(3–4): 451–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP, Fréret S (2009) Evidence of political yardstick competition in France using a two-regime spatial Durbin model with fixed effects. J Reg Sci 49(5): 931–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermini B, Santolini R (2010) Local expenditure interaction in Italian municipalities. Do local council partnerships make a difference?. Local Govern Stud 36: 655–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M, Madies T, Paty S (2008) Public spending interactions and local politics. Empirical evidence from French municipalities. Public Choice 137: 57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese RJ (2000) Electoral and partisan manipulation of public debt in developed democracies, 1956–1990. In: Strauch R, Von Hagen J (eds) Institutions, politics and fiscal policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 61–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heyndels B, Vuchelen J (1998) Tax mimicking among Belgian municipalities. Natl Tax J 51: 89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs JPAM, Lighthart JE, Vrijburg H (2007) Consumption tax competition among governments: evidence from the United States. Int Tax Public Finance 17: 271–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs JPAM, Ligthart JE, Vrijburg H (2009) Dynamic panel data models featuring endogenous interaction and spatially correlated errors. Center Discussion Paper No. 2009-92

  • Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17: 99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukenova M, Monteiro JA (2009) Spatial dynamic panel model and system GMM: a Monte Carlo investigation. MPRA Working Paper No. 14319

  • Ladd HF (1992) Mimicking of local tax burdens among neighboring counties. Public Finance Q 20: 450–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrizii V, Rapallini C, Zito G (2006) I “patti” di stabilità interni. Riv diritto finanziario sci delle finanze 65: 1–2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelli F (2001) Spatial patterns in local taxation: tax mimicking or error mimicking?. Appl Econ 33: 1101–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 71: 135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz FMM, Gerard M (2008) Is there evidence of strategic corporate tax interaction among EU countries? MPRA Working Paper 10094

  • Salmon P (1987) Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 3(2): 24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santolini R (2008) A spatial cross-sectional analysis of political trend in the Italian municipalities. Pap Reg Sci 87: 431–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santolini R (2009) The political trend in local government tax setting. Public Choice 139(1–2): 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Ollé A (2003) Electoral accountability and tax mimicking: the effects of electoral margins, coalition government, and ideology. Eur J Polit Econ 19: 685–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Ollé A (2006) Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions: empirical evidence from local governments in spain. J Urban Econ 59(1): 32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland D, Price R, Joumard I (2005) Fiscal rules for sub-central governments. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 465

  • Veiga LG, Veiga FJ (2007) Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice 131: 45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek M (2008) A guide to modern econometrics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaella Santolini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartolini, D., Santolini, R. Political yardstick competition among Italian municipalities on spending decisions. Ann Reg Sci 49, 213–235 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0437-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0437-5

JEL Classification

Navigation