Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 495–518 | Cite as

Growth of new firms and spatially bounded knowledge externalities

  • Otto Raspe
  • Frank van OortEmail author
Open Access
Special Issue Paper
First Online:

Abstract

If localized knowledge spillovers are important, new firms will tend to locate in proximity of one another, as well as other knowledge sources, in order to capitalize on external knowledge stocks. Although theories that emphasize knowledge spillovers thus present the urban and regional character of a firm’s proximity to knowledge sources as a stylized fact, the microfoundations of economic growth in agglomerations are among the most anticipated issues in urban economic research. In this paper, we define knowledge-intensive environments along several dimensions, and analyze new firms’ survival and growth at the individual level. We apply multilevel regression to avoid potential estimation biases, and use firm-level data for newly established manufacturing and business services firms over the period of 2001–2006 in the Netherlands. We find that the urban knowledge context significantly relates to firm-level employment growth, but that this is conditioned by heterogeneous features of the firm population and knowledge externalities, including (a) industries—more in services than in manufacturing; (b) types of knowledge context—more positively related to (non-technical) innovation than to (technologically) R&D related variables; and (c) types of post entry process—different for survival and growth. We also find significant interaction effects between the growth of R&D-specialized firms with university presence.

JEL Classification

C21 O18 R11 R30 
Download to read the full article text

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Joris Knoben and Erik Stam and two anonymous referees for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Plummer LA (2005) Penetrating the ‘knowledge filter’ in regional economies. Ann Reg Sci 39: 439–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2004) ‘The missing link’: the knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in economic growth. CEPR working paper 4358Google Scholar
  3. Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howard P, Prantl S (2008) Entry, innovation, and growth: theory and evidence. Rev Econ Stat (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch DB, Mahmood T (1994) Entry, growth, and survival: the new learning on firm selection and industry evolution. In: Aiginger K, Finsinger J (eds) Applied industrial organization: towards a theory based on empirical industrial organization. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85–93Google Scholar
  5. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation, growth and survival. Int J Ind Organ 13: 441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch DB, Mata J (1995) The post-entry performance of firms: introduction. Int J Ind Organ 13: 413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005a) Mansfield’s missing link: the impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. J Technol Transf 30: 207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005b) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?. Res Policy 34: 1191–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch DB, Keilbach MC, Lehmann EE (2006) Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch DB, Dohse D (2007) Location: a neglected determinant of firm growth. Rev World Econ 143: 79–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 44(7): 1242–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Strumsky D (2007) Invention in the city: increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Res Policy 36: 107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beugelsdijk S (2007) The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance: a plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Econ Geogr 83: 181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Black G (2004) The geography of small firm innovation. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Bosma N, van Stel A, Suddle K (2006) The geography of new firm formation: evidence from independent start-ups and new subsidiaries in the Netherlands. EIM: ZoetermeerGoogle Scholar
  16. Breschi S, Malerba F, Orsenigo L (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Econ J 110: 388–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brouwer E, Kleinknecht A, Reijnen JON (1993) Employment growth and innovation at the firm level. J Evol Econ 2: 153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bullen N, Jones K, Duncan C (1997) Modelling complexity: analyzing between-individual and between-place variation—a multilevel tutorial. Environ Planning A 29(4): 585–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burger M, Raspe O, Van Oort F (2008) Agglomeration economies and firm performance: a mixed hierarchical and cross-classified model. Paper prepared for the 3rd Dutch-Israel RSA workshop, JeruzalemGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlino G, Chatterjee S, Hunt R (2007) Urban density and the rate of invention. J Urban Econ 61: 389–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Cortright J, Mayer H (2001) High-tech specialization: a comparison of high-tech centers. The Brookings Survey paper, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  23. Devereux MP, Griffith R, Simpson H (2007) Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities. J Public Econ 91: 413–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Döring T, Schnellenbach J (2006) What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Reg Stud 40: 375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1:4: 2063–2117. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  26. Esteve-Pérez S, Manez-Castillejo JA (2008) The resource-based theory of the firm and firm survival. Small Bus Econ 30: 231–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feldman MP, Audretsch DB (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43: 409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Florax RJGM, Folmer H (1992) Knowledge impacts of universities on industry: an aggregate simultaneous investment model. J Reg Sci 32: 437–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fritsch M (2004) Cooperation and the efficiency of regional R&D activities. Camb J Econ 28: 829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry?. Int J Ind Organ 13: 421–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100: 1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glaeser EL, Maré DC (2001) Cities and skills. J Labor Econ 19(2): 316–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models, 3rd edn. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Gordon IR, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?. Urban Stud 37(3): 513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grosmann GM, Helpman E (1991) Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur Econ Rev 35: 517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harrison B, Kelley MR, Gant J (1996) Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change. Econ Geogr 72: 233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann Econ Soc Meas 5: 475–492Google Scholar
  38. Henderson JV (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53: 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henderson JV (2007) Understanding knowledge spillovers. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37: 497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hox JJ (2002) Multilevel analysis: techniques and Applications. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  41. Illeris S (1996) The service economy: a geographical approach. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  42. Knoben J (2008) Localized inter-organizational linkages, agglomeration effects, and the innovative performance of firms. Ann Reg Sci (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  43. Koo J (2005) Agglomeration and spillovers in a simultaneous framework. Ann Reg Sci 39: 35–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kreft IGG, de Leeuw J (2004) Introducing multilevel modelling. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanism of economic development. J Monet Econ XXII: 3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucas RE (1993) Making a miracle. Econometrica 61: 251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malmberg A, Malmberg B, Lundequist P (2000) Agglomeration and firm performance: economies of scale, localisation, and urbanisation among Swedish export firms. Environment and Planning AGoogle Scholar
  48. Maskell P (2001) The firm in economic geography. Econ Geogr 77: 329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mathur VK (1999) Human-capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Econ Dev Q XIII: 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miles I, Kastrinos N, Flanagan K, Bilderbeek R, den Hertog P, Huntink W, Bouman M (1995) Knowledge intensive business services: their roles as users, carriers and sources of innovation. Report to DG13 SPRINT-EIMS, PREST, Manchester, MarchGoogle Scholar
  51. Muller E, Zenker A (2001) Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Res Policy 30: 1501–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. OECD : (2003) Science, technology and industry scoreboard. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parker SC (2005) The economics of entrepreneurship: what we know and what we don’t. Found Trends Technol Inf Oper Manag 1: 1–54Google Scholar
  54. Raspe O, van Oort FG (2006) The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. Eur Plan Stud 14: 1209–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raspe O, van Oort FG (2008) Firm growth and localized knowledge externalities. J Reg Anal Policy 38(2): 100–116Google Scholar
  56. Raudenbusch SW, Bruyk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  57. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94: 1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev Econ Stat 85: 377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Santarelli E, Vivarelli M (2007) Entrepreneurship and the process of firm’s entry, survival and growth. Ind Corp Change 16(3): 455–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saviotti PP, Pyka A (2004) Economic development by the creation of new sectors. J Evol Econ 14: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scott AJ (1995) The geographical foundations of industrial performance. Compet Change 1: 51–66Google Scholar
  62. Sena V (2004) Total factor productivity and the spillover hypothesis: some new evidence. Int J Prod Econ 92: 31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Am J Sociol 106(2): 424–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stam E (2007) Entrepreneurship and innovation. In: Nooteboom B (ed) Micro-foundations for innovation policy. The Hague, WRRGoogle Scholar
  65. Sternberg R, Arndt O (2001) The firm or the region. What determines the innovation behaviour of European firms?. Econ Geogr 77: 364–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res Policy 32: 229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor M, Asheim B (2001) The concept of the firm in economic geography. Econ Geogr 77: 315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15: 285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Oort FG (2004) Urban growth and innovation; spatially bounded externalities in the Netherlands. Aldershot, AshgateGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Oort FG, Atzema OALC (2004) On the conceptualization of agglomeration economies: the case of new firm formation in the Dutch ICT sector. Ann Reg Sci 38: 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Varga A (2000) Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. J Reg Sci 40(2): 289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weterings A, Koster S (2007) Inheriting knowledge and sustaining relationships: What stimulates the innovative performance of small software firms in the Netherlands?. Res Policy 36(3): 320–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU), Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)The HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations