Abstract
If localized knowledge spillovers are important, new firms will tend to locate in proximity of one another, as well as other knowledge sources, in order to capitalize on external knowledge stocks. Although theories that emphasize knowledge spillovers thus present the urban and regional character of a firm’s proximity to knowledge sources as a stylized fact, the microfoundations of economic growth in agglomerations are among the most anticipated issues in urban economic research. In this paper, we define knowledge-intensive environments along several dimensions, and analyze new firms’ survival and growth at the individual level. We apply multilevel regression to avoid potential estimation biases, and use firm-level data for newly established manufacturing and business services firms over the period of 2001–2006 in the Netherlands. We find that the urban knowledge context significantly relates to firm-level employment growth, but that this is conditioned by heterogeneous features of the firm population and knowledge externalities, including (a) industries—more in services than in manufacturing; (b) types of knowledge context—more positively related to (non-technical) innovation than to (technologically) R&D related variables; and (c) types of post entry process—different for survival and growth. We also find significant interaction effects between the growth of R&D-specialized firms with university presence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acs ZJ, Plummer LA (2005) Penetrating the ‘knowledge filter’ in regional economies. Ann Reg Sci 39: 439–456
Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2004) ‘The missing link’: the knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in economic growth. CEPR working paper 4358
Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howard P, Prantl S (2008) Entry, innovation, and growth: theory and evidence. Rev Econ Stat (forthcoming)
Audretsch DB, Mahmood T (1994) Entry, growth, and survival: the new learning on firm selection and industry evolution. In: Aiginger K, Finsinger J (eds) Applied industrial organization: towards a theory based on empirical industrial organization. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85–93
Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation, growth and survival. Int J Ind Organ 13: 441–457
Audretsch DB, Mata J (1995) The post-entry performance of firms: introduction. Int J Ind Organ 13: 413–419
Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005a) Mansfield’s missing link: the impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. J Technol Transf 30: 207–210
Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005b) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?. Res Policy 34: 1191–1202
Audretsch DB, Keilbach MC, Lehmann EE (2006) Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Audretsch DB, Dohse D (2007) Location: a neglected determinant of firm growth. Rev World Econ 143: 79–107
Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 44(7): 1242–1254
Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Strumsky D (2007) Invention in the city: increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Res Policy 36: 107–120
Beugelsdijk S (2007) The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance: a plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Econ Geogr 83: 181–199
Black G (2004) The geography of small firm innovation. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Bosma N, van Stel A, Suddle K (2006) The geography of new firm formation: evidence from independent start-ups and new subsidiaries in the Netherlands. EIM: Zoetermeer
Breschi S, Malerba F, Orsenigo L (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Econ J 110: 388–410
Brouwer E, Kleinknecht A, Reijnen JON (1993) Employment growth and innovation at the firm level. J Evol Econ 2: 153–159
Bullen N, Jones K, Duncan C (1997) Modelling complexity: analyzing between-individual and between-place variation—a multilevel tutorial. Environ Planning A 29(4): 585–609
Burger M, Raspe O, Van Oort F (2008) Agglomeration economies and firm performance: a mixed hierarchical and cross-classified model. Paper prepared for the 3rd Dutch-Israel RSA workshop, Jeruzalem
Carlino G, Chatterjee S, Hunt R (2007) Urban density and the rate of invention. J Urban Econ 61: 389–419
Caroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cortright J, Mayer H (2001) High-tech specialization: a comparison of high-tech centers. The Brookings Survey paper, pp 1–18
Devereux MP, Griffith R, Simpson H (2007) Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities. J Public Econ 91: 413–435
Döring T, Schnellenbach J (2006) What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Reg Stud 40: 375–395
Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1:4: 2063–2117. Elsevier
Esteve-Pérez S, Manez-Castillejo JA (2008) The resource-based theory of the firm and firm survival. Small Bus Econ 30: 231–249
Feldman MP, Audretsch DB (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43: 409–429
Florax RJGM, Folmer H (1992) Knowledge impacts of universities on industry: an aggregate simultaneous investment model. J Reg Sci 32: 437–466
Fritsch M (2004) Cooperation and the efficiency of regional R&D activities. Camb J Econ 28: 829–846
Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry?. Int J Ind Organ 13: 421–440
Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100: 1126–1152
Glaeser EL, Maré DC (2001) Cities and skills. J Labor Econ 19(2): 316–342
Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models, 3rd edn. Arnold, London
Gordon IR, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?. Urban Stud 37(3): 513–532
Grosmann GM, Helpman E (1991) Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur Econ Rev 35: 517–526
Harrison B, Kelley MR, Gant J (1996) Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change. Econ Geogr 72: 233–258
Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann Econ Soc Meas 5: 475–492
Henderson JV (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53: 1–28
Henderson JV (2007) Understanding knowledge spillovers. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37: 497–508
Hox JJ (2002) Multilevel analysis: techniques and Applications. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Illeris S (1996) The service economy: a geographical approach. Wiley, Chichester
Knoben J (2008) Localized inter-organizational linkages, agglomeration effects, and the innovative performance of firms. Ann Reg Sci (forthcoming)
Koo J (2005) Agglomeration and spillovers in a simultaneous framework. Ann Reg Sci 39: 35–37
Kreft IGG, de Leeuw J (2004) Introducing multilevel modelling. Sage, London
Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanism of economic development. J Monet Econ XXII: 3–42
Lucas RE (1993) Making a miracle. Econometrica 61: 251–272
Malmberg A, Malmberg B, Lundequist P (2000) Agglomeration and firm performance: economies of scale, localisation, and urbanisation among Swedish export firms. Environment and Planning A
Maskell P (2001) The firm in economic geography. Econ Geogr 77: 329–344
Mathur VK (1999) Human-capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Econ Dev Q XIII: 203–216
Miles I, Kastrinos N, Flanagan K, Bilderbeek R, den Hertog P, Huntink W, Bouman M (1995) Knowledge intensive business services: their roles as users, carriers and sources of innovation. Report to DG13 SPRINT-EIMS, PREST, Manchester, March
Muller E, Zenker A (2001) Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Res Policy 30: 1501–1516
OECD : (2003) Science, technology and industry scoreboard. OECD, Paris
Parker SC (2005) The economics of entrepreneurship: what we know and what we don’t. Found Trends Technol Inf Oper Manag 1: 1–54
Raspe O, van Oort FG (2006) The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. Eur Plan Stud 14: 1209–1234
Raspe O, van Oort FG (2008) Firm growth and localized knowledge externalities. J Reg Anal Policy 38(2): 100–116
Raudenbusch SW, Bruyk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models. Sage, Newbury Park
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94: 1002–1037
Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev Econ Stat 85: 377–393
Santarelli E, Vivarelli M (2007) Entrepreneurship and the process of firm’s entry, survival and growth. Ind Corp Change 16(3): 455–488
Saviotti PP, Pyka A (2004) Economic development by the creation of new sectors. J Evol Econ 14: 1–35
Scott AJ (1995) The geographical foundations of industrial performance. Compet Change 1: 51–66
Sena V (2004) Total factor productivity and the spillover hypothesis: some new evidence. Int J Prod Econ 92: 31–42
Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Am J Sociol 106(2): 424–462
Stam E (2007) Entrepreneurship and innovation. In: Nooteboom B (ed) Micro-foundations for innovation policy. The Hague, WRR
Sternberg R, Arndt O (2001) The firm or the region. What determines the innovation behaviour of European firms?. Econ Geogr 77: 364–382
Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res Policy 32: 229–253
Taylor M, Asheim B (2001) The concept of the firm in economic geography. Econ Geogr 77: 315–328
Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15: 285–305
Van Oort FG (2004) Urban growth and innovation; spatially bounded externalities in the Netherlands. Aldershot, Ashgate
Van Oort FG, Atzema OALC (2004) On the conceptualization of agglomeration economies: the case of new firm formation in the Dutch ICT sector. Ann Reg Sci 38: 1–28
Varga A (2000) Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. J Reg Sci 40(2): 289–309
Weterings A, Koster S (2007) Inheriting knowledge and sustaining relationships: What stimulates the innovative performance of small software firms in the Netherlands?. Res Policy 36(3): 320–335
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Joris Knoben and Erik Stam and two anonymous referees for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Raspe, O., van Oort, F. Growth of new firms and spatially bounded knowledge externalities. Ann Reg Sci 46, 495–518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0357-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0357-9