Abstract
This study analyzes the links between efficiency and the decentralization of power in Spanish local governments for the years 1995 and 2000. To this end, we carried out a two-stage activity analysis in which the performance of each municipality was first evaluated against other municipalities with a similar level of power and, in a second stage, compared with that of other municipalities for which decentralization remained at a more preliminary stage. Results suggest that some municipalities could manage their resources more efficiently if they were granted more power. Although these sort of decentralized economies do not emerge for all municipalities, their magnitude clearly overshadows the diseconomies found if downscaling of decision making goes too far and least decentralized municipalities dominate. In addition, the likely efficiency gains from enhanced decentralization increase over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina A (1999) Too large and too small governments. In: Tanzi V, Chu K, Gupta S (eds) Economic policy and equity. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, pp 216–234
Balaguer-Coll MT, Prior D, Tortosa-Ausina E (2007) On the determinants of local government performance: a two-stage nonparametric approach. Eur Econ Rev 51(2): 425–451
Barankay I, Lockwood B (2007) Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: evidence from Swiss cantons. J Public Econ 91(5-6): 1197–1218
Bennett RJ (1997) Administrative systems and economic spaces. Reg Stud 31(3): 323–336
Berglas E, Pines D (1981) Clubs, local public goods and transportation models: a synthesis. J Public Econ 15(2): 141–162
Besley T, Coate S (2003) Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach. J Public Econ 87: 2611–2637
Bosch N, Suárez-Pandiello J (1993) Institutional restrictions and local public economics: a Spanish approach. J Public Financ Public Choice 11(2–3): 111–121
Bosch N, Suárez-Pandiello J (1995) Seven hypotheses about public choice and local spending (a test from Spanish municipalities). Public Financ 50(1): 36–50
Bosch N, Pedraja F, Suárez-Pandiello J (2000) Measuring the efficiency of Spanish municipal refuse collection services. Local Gov Stud 26(3): 71–90
Bradford D, Malt R, Oates W (1969) The rising cost of local public services: some evidence and reflections. Natl Tax J 22: 185–202
Cai H, Treisman D (2004) State corroding federalism. J Public Econ 88: 819–843
Cerniglia F (2003) Decentralization in the public sector: quantitative aspects in federal and unitary countries. J Policy Model 25: 749–776
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6): 429–444
Crook RC, Sverrisson AS (2001) Decentralisation and poverty-alleviation in developing countries: a comparative analysis or, is West Bengal unique? Working Paper 130, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, Brighton
Davoodi H, Zou H (1998) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: a cross-country study. J Urban Econ 43(2): 244–257
De Borger B, Kerstens K (1996a) Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: a comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26: 145–170
De Borger B, Kerstens K (1996b) Radial and nonradial measures of technical efficiency: an empirical illustration for Belgian local governments using an FDH reference technology. J Prod Anal 7: 41–62
Deller SC (1990) An application of a test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector. Reg Sci Urban Econ 20: 395–406
Deller SC (1992) Production efficiency in local government: a parametric approach. Public Financ 47: 32–44
Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurement, Chap 10. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 243–267
Ebel RD, Yilmaz S (2002) On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper 2809. The World Bank, Washington
Faguet J-P (2004) Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. J Public Econ 88: 867–893
Fan Y (1994) Testing the goodness-of-fit of a parametric density function by kernel method. Econ Theory 10: 316–356
Fan Y, Ullah A (1999) On goodness-of-fit tests for weekly dependent processes using kernel method. J Nonparametr Stat 11: 337–360
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soci Ser A 120: 253–281
Fox KJ (2001) Efficiency in the public sector, studies in productivity and efficiency, vol 1. Kluwer, Boston
Garcia-Mila T, McGuire TJ (2002) Fiscal decentralization in Spain: an asymmetric transition to democracy. Technical report, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Gil Jiménez F (2001) Une analyse des desequilibres financiers des collectivites locales en Espagne. Rev Econ Reg Urbaine 0(3): 369–392
Gilbert G, Picard P (1996) Incentives and optimal size of local jurisdictions. Eur Econ Rev 40(1): 19–41
Giménez V, Prior D (2007) Long-and short-term cost efficiency frontier evaluation: evidence from Spanish local Governments. Fiscal Stud 28(1): 121–139
Giménez VM (2004) Un modelo FDH para la medida de la eficiencia en costes de los departamentos universitarios. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economfa Pública 168(1): 69–92
Grosskopf S, Hayes KJ (1993) Local public sector bureaucrats and their input choices. J Urban Econ 33: 151–166
Grosskopf S, Yaisawarng S (1990) Economies of scope in the provision of local public services. Natl Tax J 43(1): 61–74
Hayes KJ, Chang S (1990) The relative efficiency of city manager and mayor-council forms of government. South Econ J 57: 167–177
Hochman O, Pines D, Thisse J (1995) On the optimal structure of local governments. Am Econ Rev 85(5): 1224–1240
Hughes PAN, Edwards ME (2000) Leviathan vs. Lilliputian: a data envelopment analysis of government efficiency. J Reg Sci 40(4): 649–669
Iimi A (2005) Decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical note. J Urban Econ 57(3): 449–461
Inman R, Rubinfeld D (1997) Rethinking federalism. J Econ Perspect 11(4): 43–64
Inman R, Rubinfeld D (1998) Subsidiarity and the European Union. Working Paper 6556, NBER, Cambridge
Keating M (1998) The new regionalism in Western Europe: territorial restructuring and political change. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Kerstens K, Vanden Eeckaut P (1999) Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit. Eur J Oper Res 113: 206–214
Klugman J (1994) Decentralisation: a survey of literature from a human development perspective. Development Programme Occasional Paper 13, United Nations, Human Development Report Office, New York
Ladd HF (1994) Fiscal impacts of population growth: a conceptual and empirical analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 24: 661–686
Li Q (1996) Nonparametric testing of closeness between two unknown distribution functions. Econ Rev 15: 261–274
López Guerra L (1987) Constitución Espaola. Tecnos, Madrid
Martinez-Vazquez J, McNab R (2003) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Dev 31(9): 1597–1616
Martins-Filho C, Yao F (2007) Nonparametric frontier estimation via local linear regression. J Econ 141(1): 283–319
Martins-Filho C, Yao F (2008) A smooth conditional quantile frontier estimator. J Econ 143: 317–333
Minis H, Rondinelli D (1990) Administrative restructuring for economic adjustment: decentralization policy in Senegal. Int Rev Adm Sci 56: 447–466
Molero J-C (2001) Analysis of decentralization of public spending in Spain. Public Financ Manag 1(4): 500–556
Monasterio Escudero C, Suárez Pandiello J (1998) Manual de Hacienda Autonómica y Local. Ariel, Barcelona
Moreno L (2002) Decentralization in Spain. Reg Stud 36(4): 399–408
Oates WE (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York
Oates WE (1988) On the measurement of congestion in the production of local public goods. J Urban Econ 24: 85–94
Oates WE (1993) Fiscal decentralization and economic development. Working Paper 04, Economics Department, University of Maryland
Oates WE (1999) An essay on fiscal federalism. J Econ Lit 37(3): 1120–1149
Olson M Jr (1969) The principle of “fiscal equivalence”: the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. Am Econ Rev 59(2): 479–487
Pagan A, Ullah A (1999) Nonparametric econometrics. Themes in modern econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Park BU, Simar L, Weiner C (2000) The FDH estimator for productivity efficiency scores. Econ Theory 16(6): 855–877
Pastor J, Tortosa-Ausina E (2008) Social capital and bank performance: an international comparison for OECD countries. Manchester Sch 76(2): 223–265
Prieto ÁM, Zofío JL (2001) Evaluating effectiveness in public provision of infrastructure and equipment: The case of Spanish municipalities. J Prod Anal 15(1): 41–58
Prior D, Sola M (2000) Technical efficiency and economies of diversification in health care. Health Care Manag Sci 3: 299–307
Prud’homme R (1994) On the dangers of decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper 1252, World Bank, Washington
Prud’homme R (1995) The dangers of decentralization. World Bank Res Obs 10: 201–220
Putnam RD (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Rodríguez-Pose A, Bwire A (2004) The economic (in)efficiency of devolution. Environ Plann A 36(11): 1907–1928
Rodríguez-Pose A, Gill N (2005) On the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution. Reg Stud 39(4): 405–420
Rondinelli D, Nellis J (1986) Assessing decentralization policies in developing countries: the case for cautious optimism. Dev Policy Rev 4(1): 3–23
Ruggiero J (1995) On the measurement and causes of technical inefficiency in local public services: With an application to public education. J Public Admin Res Theory 5(4): 403–428
Sampaio de Sousa M, Stošić B (2005) Technical efficiency of the Brazilian municipalities: correcting nonparametric frontier measurements for outliers. J Prod Anal 24: 157–181
Sewell DO (1996) The dangers of decentralization according to prud’homme: Some further aspects. World Bank Res Obs 11(1): 143–150
Shah A (1999) Fiscal federalism and macroeconomic governance: For better or for worse?. In: Fukasaku K, De Mello LR (eds) Fiscal decentralization in emerging countries: governance issues. OECD, Paris, pp 37–54
Sheather SJ, Jones MC (1991) A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 53(3): 683–690
Shleifer A (1997) Government in transition. Eur Econ Rev 41(3-5): 385–410
Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London
Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13(1): 49–78
Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2006) On testing equality of distributions of technical efficiency scores. Econ Rev 25(4): 497–522
Smith BC (1985) Decentralization: the territorial dimension of state. George Allen & Unwin, London
Solé-Ollé A (1997) Tax exporting and redistributive politics: an empirical investigation on the determinants of Spanish local tax structure. Public Financ 52(1): 102–124
Solé-Ollé A (2001) Determinantes del gasto público local: necesidades de gasto o capacidad fiscal. Rev Econ Apl 25: 115–156
Solé-Ollé A, Bosch N (2002) On the relationship between local authority size and expenditure: lessons for the design of intergovenmental transfers in Spain. Technical report, Institut d’Economia de Barcelona, Barcelona
Stewart K (2000) Fiscal federalism in Russia: intergovernmental transfers and the financing of education. Edward Elgar Publishing,
Suárez Pandiello J (1999) Fiscal federalism in Spain. Decentralisation: an unfinished task. In: Fossati A, Panella G (eds) Fiscal federalism in the European Union. Routledge, London
Tanzi V (1995) Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects. In: Bruno M, Pleskovic B (eds) Annual World Bank Conference on development economics. World Bank, Washington, pp 295–316
Taylor LL (1995) Allocative efficiency and local government. J Urban Econ 37: 201–211
Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64: 416–424
Treisman D (2002) Decentralization and the quality of government. Working paper, Department of Political Science, UCLA, Los Angeles
Tulkens H (1993) On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. J Prod Anal 4: 183–210
Tulkens H, Vanden Eeckaut P (1995) Non-parametric efficienct, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects. Eur J Oper Res 80: 474–499
Vanden Eeckaut P, Tulkens H, Jamar M-A (1993) Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency, Chap 12.. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 300–334
Wallis JJ, Oates WE (1988) Decentralization in the public sector: an empirical study of the state and local government. In: Rosen HS (eds) Fiscal federalism: quantitative studies, National Bureau of Economic Research, Chap 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 5–32
Worthington AC (2000) Cost efficiency in Australian local government: a comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financ Account Manag 16: 201–223
Worthington AC, Dollery BE (2000a) An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in local government. Local Govern Stud 26: 23–52
Worthington AC, Dollery BE (2000b) Measuring efficiency in local governments’ planning and regulatory function. Public Prod Manag Rev 23(4): 469–485
Worthington AC, Dollery BE (2000c) Productive efficiency and the Australian local government grants process: An empirical analysis of New South Wales local government. Aust J Reg Stud 6(1): 95–121
Xie D, Zou H, Davoodi H (1999) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States. J Urban Econ 45(2): 228–239
Zhang T, Zou H (1998) Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. J Public Econ 67(2): 221–240
Zhang T, Zou H (2001) The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure With applications to China and India. China Econ Rev 12(1): 58–81
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Prior, D. & Tortosa-Ausina, E. Decentralization and efficiency of local government. Ann Reg Sci 45, 571–601 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0286-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0286-7