Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of lock delay on grain barge rates: examination of upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Directed acyclic graphs and multivariate time-series analysis are used to identify and measure the effect of lock delay on the upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers grain barge rates. Lock congestion on these rivers and its potentially unfavorable impact on grain barge rates that link the Midwest US to lower Mississippi River ports are of great concern. Results show that accumulated lock delay on segments of the upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers increases grain barge rates; however, the estimated dynamic relationships show that the impact is not large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Grain barge volume on the river and grain barge rates may be simultaneously determined and thus a two-way arrow would apply in Fig. 3 between these two variables. We tested for endogeneity of barge numbers (as a proxy for the unavailable measure on grain barge volume) in a barge rate equation using a Hausman test for endogeneity (Wooldridge 2002). As Japan is a primary importing country of US grain, the exchange rate of Japanese yen to US dollar is a good candidate as an instrument to measure for the grain quantity moved by barge on the river. For this instrument, we reject the hypothesis of endogeneity of total barge numbers at the 5% significance level. On the other hand, we demonstrate in the empirical section of this paper (see Table 2) that grain barge rates do affect barge numbers at lags. Detailed results on this test are available from the authors.

  2. The functional form of the underlying marginal cost curve is unknown; we assume it is constant over the study range. Of course, textbook forms do not have a constant slope on the marginal cost function, thus our results are an approximation.

  3. The purpose of this figure is to offer a sense of the response from viewing the overall pattern in one graph.

References

  • Bernanke BS (1986) Alternative explanations of the money–income correlation. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 25:49–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessler DA, Yang J, Wongcharupan M (2003) Price dynamics in international wheat markets. J Reg Sci 43(1):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley JK, Bessler DA (1983) Expectations in bulk ocean shipping: an application of autoregressive modeling. Rev Econ Stat 65(3):516–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzan JD, Tolliver DD (2000) Review of waterway grain traffic forecasts for the upper Mississippi River Basin. Available at http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/pdw/nav_study/JFAreport.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2002

  • Doan T (1992) RATS: user’s manual 4.0. Estima, Evanston, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellin L, Fuller S, Grant W, Smotek C (2001) Measuring benefits from inland waterway navigation improvements. J Transp Res Forum 40:113–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller S, Grant W (1993) Effect of lock delay on grain marketing costs: an examination of the Upper Mississippi and Illinois waterways. Logist Transp Rev 29:81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller S, Fellin L, Grant W (1998) The Upper Mississippi/Illinois Rivers and grain/soybean transportation: an analysis of transportation capacities. Texas Agricultural Market Research Center. Research Report CM 1–98, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University

  • Gervais JP, Misawa T, McVey MJ, Baumel CP (2001) Evaluating the logistic and economic impacts of extending 600-foot locks on the Upper Mississippi River: a linear programming approach. J Transp Res Forum 40(4):83–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish G, Dunn J (1998) A short-run analysis of grain barge rates on the Mississippi River system. Proc Transp Res Forum 40:557–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack Faucett Associates (1997) Waterway traffic forecasts for the Upper Mississippi River Basin, volume I summary and volume II grain. Available at http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/pdw/nav_study/JFAreport.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2002

  • Jack Faucett Associates (2000) Review of historic and projected grain traffic on the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois waterway: an addendum. Available at http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/pdw/nav_study/JFAreport.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2004

  • Miljkovic D, Price GK, Hauser RJ, Algozin KA (2000) The barge and rail freight market for export-bound grain movement from Midwest to Mexican Gulf: an econometric analysis. Transp Res Part E Logist Trans Rev 36:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science, Committee to Review the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway Navigation System Feasibility Study (2001) Inland navigation system planning: the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois waterway. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (2000) Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich JL (2001) Soy growers in Brazil shadow U.S. farmers. NY Times, Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/10/business/10SOY.html?ex=995769069&ei=1&en=4c6213a83c50fbd7. Accessed 11 July 2001

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims C (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R (2000) Causation, prediction, and search. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson NR, Granger CWJ (1997) Impulse response functions based on a causal approach to residual orthogonalization in vector autoregressions. J Am Stat Assoc 92:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources (2000) Shallow draft vessel operating costs. Economic guidance memorandum 00–05, IY 2000. Available at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/egm051.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2004

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (2004) Domestic traffic for selected U.S. inland waterways in 2002. Available at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc/wcsc/wtwytraffic02.htm. Accessed 20 August 2004

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (2001) Grain Transportation Report. http://www.ams.usda.gov/tmd/grain/index.htm. Accessed 10 August 2003

  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu T, Fuller S (2002) Factors affecting lock delay on the Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers and the effect of lock delay on barge rates. Texas Agricultural Market Research Center research report CP 2–02, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Bessler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, TH., Bessler, D.A. & Fuller, S.W. Effect of lock delay on grain barge rates: examination of upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers. Ann Reg Sci 40, 887–908 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0057-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0057-z

Jel Classification

Navigation