Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Balancing the flexion gap first in total knee arthroplasty leads to better preservation of posterior condylar offset resulting in better knee flexion

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the flexion first balancing technique, developed in an attempt to solve the dissatisfaction due to instability in total knee arthroplasties, leads to better restoration of joint line height and medial posterior condylar offset. This might result in better knee flexion, compared to the classic extension first gap balancing technique. The secondary objective is to show non-inferiority of the flexion first balancing technique in terms of clinical outcomes as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurements.

Methods

A cohort of 40 patients (46 knee replacements) operated using the flexion first balancing technique was retrospectively analyzed and compared with a cohort of 51 patients (52 knee replacements) operated using the classic gap balancing technique. Radiographic analysis of the coronal alignment, joint line height and posterior condylar offset was performed. Clinical and functional outcome data were analyzed pre- and postoperatively and compared between both groups. The two sample t test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square test and a linear mixed model were used for performing statistical analyses, after normality analyses were executed.

Results

Radiologic evaluation showed a decrease in posterior condylar offset using the classic gap balancing technique (p = 0.040) versus no change using the flexion first balancing technique (p = n.s.). No statistically significant differences were noted for joint line height and coronal alignment. Using the flexion first balancer technique leads to a greater postoperative range of motion with deeper flexion (p = 0.002) and a better Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (p = 0.025).

Conclusion

The Flexion First Balancing technique is a valid and safe technique for TKA, resulting in better preservation of PCO with consequently greater postoperative flexion and better KOOS scores.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

ROM:

Range of motion

PCO:

Posterior condylar offset

MCL:

Medial collateral ligament

FFB:

Flexion First Balancing

PROMs:

Patient Reported Outcome Measurements

GAP:

Classic extension first gap balancing

VAS:

Visual Analogue Scale

OKS:

Oxford Knee score

KOOS-PS:

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form

EQ-5D:

EuroQol-5D

JLH:

Joint line height

(c)ATJL:

(Corrected) adductor tubercle joint line distance

(c)PCO:

(Corrected) posterior condylar offset

PCL:

Posterior cruciate ligament

n.s.:

Not significant

HKA:

Hip-knee-ankle

CWF:

Coronal femoral width

LFW:

Lateral femoral width

References

  1. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang MJ, Kang SB, Chang CB, Han DH, Park HJ, Hwang K et al (2020) Posterior condylar offset changes and its effect on clinical outcomes after posterior-substituting, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing. Knee Surg Relat Res 32:10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen JC, Blackburn B, Browning B, Wilbur C, Trinity JD, Gililland JM et al (2022) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score relationship on performance measures in people undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Disabil Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.21349341-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Churchill JL, Khlopas A, Sultan AA, Harwin SF, Mont MA (2018) Gap-balancing versus measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison study. J Knee Surg 31:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freisinger GM, Hutter EE, Lewis J, Granger JF, Glassman AH, Beal MD et al (2017) Relationships between varus-valgus laxity of the severely osteoarthritic knee and gait, instability, clinical performance, and function. J Orthop Res 35:1644–1652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goutham GDV, Jain VK, Sinha S, Arya RK (2020) Effect of posterior condylar offset in post operative range of motion in cruciate retaining and sacrificing TKR: a comparative analysis. J Orthop 20:342–346

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Han HS, Kang SB (2018) Interactive effect of femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial posterior slope on knee flexion in posterior cruciate ligament-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Knee 25:335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasebe Y, Akasaka K, Yamamoto M (2021) Factors affecting early knee-flexion range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Phys Ther Sci 33:672–675

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamenaga T, Hiranaka T, Okimura K, Fujishiro T, Okamoto K (2022) Contralateral knee flexion predicts postoperative knee flexion in unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res: OTSR 108:103218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Keenan OJF, Holland G, Maempel JF, Keating JF, Scott CEH (2020) Correlations between radiological classification systems and confirmed cartilage loss in severe knee osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J. 102-b:301–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koshire S, Mohanty SS, Keny SA, Rai AK, Rathod TN, Kamble P (2022) The influence of joint line restoration on functional outcome after primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 34:102023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwak DS, Kim YD, Cho N, In Y, Kim MS, Lim D et al (2022) Restoration of the joint line configuration reproduces native mid-flexion biomechanics after total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair cadaveric study. Bioengineering 17:9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Longo UG, Candela V, Pirato F, Hirschmann MT, Becker R, Denaro V (2021) Midflexion instability in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:370–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Luyckx T, Vandenneucker H, Ing LS, Vereecke E, Ing AV, Victor J (2018) Raising the Joint Line in TKA is associated with mid-flexion laxity: a study in cadaver knees. Clin Orthop 476:601–611

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matziolis G, Brodt S, Windisch C, Roehner E (2017) Changes of posterior condylar offset results in midflexion instability in single-radius total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:713–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Popat R, Albelooshi A, Mahapatra P, Bollars P, Ettinger M, Jennings S et al (2022) Improved joint line and posterior offset restoration in primary total knee replacement using a robotic-assisted surgical technique: an international multi-centre retrospective analysis of matched cohorts. PLoS ONE 17:e0272722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramkumar PN, Navarro SM, Haeberle HS, Ng M, Piuzzi NS, Spindler KP (2018) No difference in outcomes 12 and 24 months after lower extremity total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 33:2322–2329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stambough JB, Edwards PK, Mannen EM, Barnes CL, Mears SC (2019) Flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27:642–651

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tapasvi SR, Shekhar A, Patil SS, Dipane MV, Chowdhry M, McPherson EJ (2020) Comparison of gap balancing vs measured resection technique in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one technique per knee. J Arthroplasty 35:732–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vajapey SP, Pettit RJ, Li M, Chen AF, Spitzer AI, Glassman AH (2020) Risk factors for mid-flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 35:3046–3054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Lieshout WAM, Duijnisveld BJ, Koenraadt KLM, Elmans L, Kerkhoffs G, van Geenen RCI (2019) Adequate joint line restoration and good preliminary clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using the Flexion First Balancer technique. Knee 26:794–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Lieshout WAM, Koenraadt KLM, Elmans L, van Geenen RCI (2020) Flexion First Balancer: description of new technique in TKA to reproduce joint line and pre-disease mechanical alignment. J Exp Orthop 7:23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. van Lieshout WAM, van Oost I, Koenraadt KLM, Elmans L, van Geenen RCI (2021) The effect of restored medial knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty with the flexion first balancer technique on mid-flexion laxity and functional outcome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:1029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams HA, Webster J, Teeter MG, Howard JL, Somerville LE, Lanting BA (2021) The impact of a gap balancing or measured resection surgical technique on posterior condylar offset and patient-reported outcome measures. Arthroplast Today 11:64–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang G, Chen W, Chen W, Sun X, Zhou D, Chen S et al (2016) Full-thickness cartilage-based posterior femoral condylar offset. Influence on knee flexion after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res: OTSR 102:441–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhang M, Xu Y (2021) Effect of femoral posterior condyle offset on knee joint function after total knee replacement: a network meta-analysis and a sequential retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 16:126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Belgian Society of Orthopedics & Traumatology (BVOT) research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ASVDK collected the pre- and postoperative data and drafted the manuscript. BV performed the total knee arthroplasties and participated in the design and content of the manuscript. JDS performed the total knee arthroplasties as well and reviewed the final manuscript. The statistical cell of the University of Hasselt conducted the statistical analyses. KDM and JV reviewed the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An-Sofie Van de Kelft.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not necessary as retrospective study design.

Informed consent

Not necessary as retrospective study design.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van de Kelft, AS., De Mulder, K., De Schepper, J. et al. Balancing the flexion gap first in total knee arthroplasty leads to better preservation of posterior condylar offset resulting in better knee flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 3792–3798 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07346-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07346-7

Keywords

Navigation