Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed females who pass or fail a functional test battery do not exhibit differences in knee joint landing biomechanics asymmetry before and after exercise

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

A functional test battery (FTB) has been proposed to evaluate the readiness of return to activity after ACLR. However, there is limited evidence documenting the usefulness of an FTB. Therefore, the purpose of the current investigation was to compare knee joint landing biomechanics asymmetry during double-leg jump landing (DLJL) and single-leg jump cutting (SLJC) between healthy females and ACLR females who pass (ACLR-pass) or fail (ACLR-fail) an FTB before and after the completion of a sustained exercise protocol.

Method

Eighteen ACLR females (ten ACLR-pass and eight ACLR-fail) and twelve healthy females performed an FTB including The 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale, quadriceps strength, and single-leg hop tests. DLJL and SLJC knee joint biomechanics asymmetry were measured before and after exercise.

Results

During DLJL, there were significant main effects of group on peak anterior tibial shear force (ATSF) asymmetry [F(2,27) = 3.86, p < 0.05, \(\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}\) = 0.214] and peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) asymmetry [F(2,27) = 3.34, p = 0.05, \(\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}\) = 0.198]. During SLJC, there was a significant group main effect for peak ATSF asymmetry [F(2,27) = 3.494, p = 0.04, \(\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}\) = 0.206].

Conclusion

ACLR-fail exhibited greater asymmetry in peak ATSF during DLJL and SLJC compared to healthy females. In addition, ACLR-pass exhibited greater asymmetry in peak ATSF and peak vGRF during DLJL and SLJC, respectively, compared to healthy females. However, ACLR-fail did not exhibit any significant differences in landing biomechanics asymmetry during either task compared with ACLR-pass. Furthermore, the completion of a sustained exercise protocol did not affect knee joint landing biomechanics asymmetry across groups.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell D, Kulow S, Pennuto A, Stiffler M (2014) Squatting mechanics between ACL—reconstructed patients who pass and fail return-to-sport criteria. J Athl Train 49:S-237

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisseling RW, Hof AL (2006) Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics. J Biomech 39:2438–2444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang EW, Johnson S, Pollard C, Hoffman M, Norcross M (2018) Landing biomechanics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed females who pass or fail a functional test battery. Knee 25:1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chappell JD, Herman DC, Knight BS, Kirkendall DT, Garrett WE, Yu B (2005) Effect of fatigue on knee kinetics and kinematics in stop-jump tasks. Am J Sports Med 33:1022–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin B, Johnson ST, Chang E, Pollard CD, Norcross MF (2016) Greater hip extension but not hip abduction explosive strength is associated with lesser hip adduction and knee valgus motion during a single-leg jump-cut. Orthop J Sports Med 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank B, Bell DR, Norcross MF, Blackburn JT, Goerger BM, Padua DA (2013) Trunk and hip biomechanics influence anterior cruciate loading mechanisms in physically active participants. Am J Sports Med 41:2678–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank BS, Gilsdorf CM, Goerger BM, Prentice WE, Padua DA (2014) Neuromuscular fatigue alters postural control and sagittal plane hip biomechanics in active females with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 6:301–308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gagnon D, Gagnon M (1992) The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. J Biomech 25:891–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goerger BM, Marshall SW, Beutler AI, Blackburn JT, Wilckens JH, Padua DA (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injury alters preinjury lower extremity biomechanics in the injured and uninjured leg: the JUMP-ACL study. Br J Sports Med 49:188–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gokeler A, Hof AL, Arnold MP, Dijkstra PU, Postema K, Otten E (2010) Abnormal landing strategies after ACL reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:e12–e19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomeé P, Silbernagel KG, Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Karlsson J (2006) A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:778–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P (2005) Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 33:492–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman M, Schrader J, Applegate T, Koceja D (1998) Unilateral postural control of the functionally dominant and nondominant extremities of healthy subjects. J Athl Train 33:319

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ithurburn MP, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC (2015) Young athletes with quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate asymmetric single-leg drop-landing mechanics. Am J Sports Med 43:2727–2737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston PT, McClelland JA, Webster KE (2018) Lower limb biomechanics during single-leg landings following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Auckl N Z 48:2103–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kristianslund E, Krosshaug T, van den Bogert AJ (2012) Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: implications for injury prevention. J Biomech 45:666–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Logerstedt D, Di Stasi S, Grindem H, Lynch A, Eitzen I, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2014) Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44:914–923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Logerstedt D, Grindem H, Lynch A, Eitzen I, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2012) Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Am J Sports Med 40:2348–2356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lucci S, Cortes N, Van Lunen B, Ringleb S, Onate J (2011) Knee and hip sagittal and transverse plane changes after two fatigue protocols. J Sci Med Sport 14:453–459

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. McLean SG, Samorezov JE (2009) Fatigue-induced ACL injury risk stems from a degradation in central control. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1661–1672

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Karlsson J (2006) Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:571–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norcross MF, Lewek MD, Padua DA, Shultz SJ, Weinhold PS, Blackburn JT (2013) Lower extremity energy absorption and biomechanics during landing, part I: sagittal-plane energy absorption analyses. J Athl Train 48:748–756

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Oberländer KD, Brüggemann G-P, Hoeher J, Karamanidis K (2013) Altered landing mechanics in ACL-reconstructed patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45:506–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oberländer KD, Brüggemann G-P, Höher J, Karamanidis K (2014) Knee mechanics during landing in anterior cruciate ligament patients: a longitudinal study from pre- to 12 months post-reconstruction. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 29:512–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Palmieri-Smith RM, Lepley LK (2015) Quadriceps strength asymmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alters knee joint biomechanics and functional performance at time of return to activity. Am J Sports Med 43:1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Paterno MV, Ford KR, Myer GD, Heyl R, Hewett TE (2007) Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med 17:258–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE (2012) Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med 22:116–121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, Hewett TE (2010) Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 38:1968–1978

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J, Joyce B, Shi K (2007) A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury–reduction regimen. Arthroscopy 23:1320–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson RO, Herzog W, Nigg BM (1987) Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. J Manip Physiol Ther 10:172–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K (2005) Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21:948–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Santamaria LJ, Webster KE (2010) The effect of fatigue on lower-limb biomechanics during single-limb landings: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40:464–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmitt LC, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE (2014) Strength asymmetry and landing mechanics at return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47:1426–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shelbourne KD, Sullivan AN, Bohard K, Gray T, Urch SE (2009) Return to basketball and soccer after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in competitive school-aged athletes. Sports Health 1:236–241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Cone JR, Henson RA, Montgomery MM, Pye ML, Tritsch AJ (2015) Changes in fatigue, multiplanar knee laxity, and landing biomechanics during intermittent exercise. J Athl Train 50:486–497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sutton KM, Bullock JM (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, Tsepis E, Werner S, Wondrasch B, Witvrouw E (2011) Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1798–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Webster KE, Austin DC, Feller JA, Clark RA, McClelland JA (2015) Symmetry of squatting and the effect of fatigue following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3208–3213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wright RW, Dunn WR, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld J, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wolcott M et al (2007) Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a prospective MOON cohort study. Am J Sports Med 35:1131–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology, School of Art and Sport, Inha University, 5W555B, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon, 22212, South Korea

    Eunwook Chang

  2. Kinesiology Program, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 160 SW 26th St, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    Samuel T. Johnson, Mark A. Hoffman & Marc F. Norcross

  3. Kinesiology Program, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University-Cascades, 1500 SW Chandler Ave, Bend, OR, 97701, USA

    Christine D. Pollard

Authors
  1. Eunwook Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samuel T. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine D. Pollard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark A. Hoffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marc F. Norcross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EWC participated in study design, data collection, controlling exercise protocol, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. STJ participated in study design, data analysis collection, and manuscript preparation. CDP and MAH participated in study design and manuscript preparation. MFN participated in study design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunwook Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the present study was obtained from the Oregon State University Institutional Review Board (Study ID: 7000).

Funding

This study was supported by the National Athletic Trainers’ Association Research & Education Foundation Doctoral Grant Program (no. 15DGP003).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, E., Johnson, S.T., Pollard, C.D. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed females who pass or fail a functional test battery do not exhibit differences in knee joint landing biomechanics asymmetry before and after exercise. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 1960–1970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05707-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05707-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation