Abstract
Purpose
The objective was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, survival rate and complications of primary contemporary rotating hinged total knee arthroplasty (CRH-TKA).
Methods
Through a national multicenter retrospective study (14 centers), 112 primary CRH-TKA performed between 2006 and 2011 were included. Indications were: severe frontal plane deformity (55%), inflammatory, constitutional, congenital or post-trauma arthritis (26%), ligament laxity (10%), primary osteoarthritis (9%). Population was elderly (68 ± 13), sedentary (37.5% with a Devane score ≥ 3) and with important comorbidities (87% with ASA score ≥ 2). A clinical (KSS, Oxford scores) and radiological evaluation (implant loosening), as well as survival and reoperation rates assessment, were performed.
Results
At last follow-up (7 ± 3 years), KSS and Oxford scores were 64 ± 43 and 33 ± 10 each with a significant improvement of both scores overtime (respectively, p = 0.047 and p < 0.001). Twenty-eight complications (25%) were reported: 12 infections, 6 stiffness, 5 aseptic loosening and 5 patellofemoral instabilities. All in all, 91% (n = 102) of implants were still sealed and in place, 6% (n = 7) required revision and 3% (n = 3) were loose but could not undergo revision due to weak general health status. Mortality rate (18%, n = 20), linked to comorbidities, was high.
Conclusion
Clinical outcomes and survival of primary CRH-TKA are acceptable given the difficult and complex clinical situations it faced, but with high infection rate. In primary surgery, for patients with severe deformity, bone loss or ligament laxity, the use of CRH-TKA can be recommended. The choice of these implants must remain cautious and limited to situations not allowing the use of less constrained implants.
Level of evidence
Retrospective therapeutic and cohort study, Level III; retrospective case series, Level IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bistolfi A, Lustig S, Rosso F, Dalmasso P, Crova M, Massazza G (2013) Results with 98 Endo-Modell rotating hinge prostheses for primary knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 36:e746–e752
Böhler C, Kolbitsch P, Schuh R, Lass R, Kubista B, Giurea A (2017) Midterm results of a new rotating hinge knee implant: a 5-year follow-up. Biomed Res Int 2017:7532745
Böhm P, Holy T (1998) Is there a future for hinged prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty? A 20-year survivorship analysis of the Blauth prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80:302–309
Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Jt Surg Br 54:61–76
Cheng H, Chen BP-H, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P (2017) Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review. Surg Infect 18:722–735
Cottino U, Abdel MP, Perry KI, Mara KC, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2017) Long-term results after total knee arthroplasty with contemporary rotating-hinge prostheses. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:324–330
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80:63–69
Dejour H, Neyret P (1991) Different knee prostheses and their technical problems. Rev Prat 41:1447–1455
Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, Coldham G, Krause B (1997) Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis: factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplast 12:256–266
Draganich LF, Whitehurst JB, Chou LS, Piotrowski GA, Pottenger LA, Finn HA (1999) The effects of the rotating-hinge total knee replacement on gait and stair stepping. J Arthroplast 14:743–755
Efe T, Roessler PP, Heyse TJ, Hauk C, Pahrmann C, Getgood A, Schmitt J (2012) Mid-term results after implantation of rotating-hinge knee prostheses: primary versus revision. Orthop Rev 4:e35
Farid YR, Thakral R, Finn HA (2015) Intermediate-term results of 142 single-design, rotating-hinge implants: frequent complications may not preclude salvage of severely affected knees. J Arthroplast 30:2173–2180
Gehrke T, Kendoff D, Haasper C (2014) The role of hinges in primary total knee replacement. Bone Jt J 96-B:93–95
Inglis AE, Walker PS (1991) Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:757–761
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Sato J, Ishii H, Takayama S, Toyabe S-I (2017) Life expectancy of osteoarthritic patients after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma 8:S57–S61
Kearns SM, Culp BM, Bohl DD, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR (2018) Rotating hinge implants for complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33:766–770
Kowalczewski J, Marczak D, Synder M, Sibiński M (2014) Primary rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty: good outcomes at mid-term follow-up. J Arthroplast 29:1202–1206
Long R, Gheduzzi S, Bucher TA, Toms AD, Miles AW (2013) A biomechanical evaluation of hinged total knee replacement prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 227:875–883
Lozano LM, López V, Ríos J, Popescu D, Torner P, Castillo F, Maculé F (2012) Better outcomes in severe and morbid obese patients (BMI > 35 kg/m2) in primary Endo-Model rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. Sci World J 2012:249391
Martin JR, Beahrs TR, Stuhlman CR, Trousdale RT (2016) Complex primary total knee arthroplasty: long-term outcomes. J Bone Jt Surg Am 98:1459–1470
Mavrodontidis AN, Andrikoula SI, Kontogeorgakos VA, Babis GC, Xenakis TA, Beris AE, Soucacos PN (2008) Application of the Endomodel rotating hinge knee prosthesis for knee osteoarthritis. J Surg Orthop Adv 17:179–184
Moussa ME, Lee Y-Y, Patel AR, Westrich GH (2017) Clinical outcomes following the use of constrained condylar knees in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32:1869–1873
Petrou G, Petrou H, Tilkeridis C, Stavrakis T, Kapetsis T, Kremmidas N, Gavras M (2004) Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86:813–817
Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF (2007) Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1735–1741
Rand JA, Chao EY, Stauffer RN (1987) Kinematic rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:489–497
Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol 2:281–284
Sanguineti F, Mangano T, Formica M, Franchin F (2014) Total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge Endo-Model prosthesis: clinical results in complex primary and revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1601–1607
Smith TH, Gad BV, Klika AK, Styron JF, Joyce TA, Barsoum WK (2013) Comparison of mechanical and nonmechanical failure rates associated with rotating hinged total knee arthroplasty in nontumor patients. J Arthroplast 28:62–67.e1
Weiss RJ, Thorsell M, Stark A, Nyvang J, Hedström M (2014) 2- to 9-year outcome of stemmed total knee arthroplasty: similar failure rates in patients when used primary or as a revision. Acta Orthop 85:609–613
Yang J-H, Yoon J-R, Oh C-H, Kim T-S (2012) Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:517–523
Acknowledgement
This study was organised by the French Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Society (SOFCOT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
For all authors, there is no conflict of interest in the present study.
Ethical approval
French Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Society (SOFCOT) does not require an ethical approval for in-house studies on standard of care procedures.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neri, T., Boyer, B., Papin, PE. et al. Contemporary rotating hinge arthroplasty can safely be recommended in complex primary surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 1780–1788 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05589-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05589-x