Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconstruction of chronic proximal hamstring avulsion injuries using ipsilateral distal hamstring tendons results in good clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction

  • HIP
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To report outcomes following proximal hamstring reconstruction employing an ipsilateral distal hamstring tendon autograft, in patients with chronic proximal ruptures.

Methods

Six patients presenting with a chronic proximal hamstring avulsion and a medial time from injury of 11.0 months (range 7–18), confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging, underwent proximal hamstring repair using a free graft harvested from the ipsilateral distal hamstrings. Patients were evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery, via the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool, the Short Form Health Survey, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, the Active Knee Extension and 6 min walk tests, the single and triple hop tests for distance, and isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength. Knee strength was assessed at 180° and 240°/s (total work, peak and average torque), and both mean absolute scores and limb symmetry indices (LSIs) comparing the operated and non-operated limbs were presented.

Results

Patients demonstrated good clinical improvement throughout the post-operative timeline in all subjective and objective outcomes. Mean knee extensor LSIs had recovered by 12 and 24 months. At 24 months post-surgery, while mean LSIs for knee flexor peak and average torque were at (or above) 90%, a significant difference still existed between the operated and non-operated limbs in knee flexor total work. At 24 months, five patients (83%) were satisfied with the results of the surgery, as well as their ability to return to recreational and sporting activities. There were two adverse events including an early deep vein thrombosis and a secondary surgery to remove a loosened staple.

Conclusions

While isokinetic hamstring strength had not fully recovered by 24 months, this surgical technique demonstrated a high level of patient satisfaction and return to function, in patients with chronic proximal hamstring ruptures. As the clinical relevance, this surgical technique provides a viable option with good post-operative outcomes for patients with chronic proximal hamstring tears that cannot be approximated back to the ischium.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL (1999) The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. N Am Orthop Rehabil Res Netw Phys Ther 79:371–383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Birmingham P, Muller M, Wickiewicz T, Cavanaugh J, Rodeo S, Warren R (2011) Functional outcome after repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1819–1826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blakeney WG, Zilko SR, Edmonston SJ, Schupp NE, Annear PT (2017) A prospective evaluation of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: improved functional outcomes following surgical repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1943–1950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blakeney WG, Zilko SR, Edmonston SJ, Schupp NE, Annear PT (2017) Proximal hamstring tendon avulsion surgery: evaluation of the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1936–1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bodendorfer BM, Curley AJ, Kotler JA, Ryan JM, Jejurikar NS, Kumar A, Postma WF (2018) Outcomes after operative and nonoperative treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 46:2798–2808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chahal J, Bush-Joseph CA, Chow A, Zelazny A, Mather RC III, Lin EC, Gupta D, Verma NN (2012) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes after surgical repair of complete proximal hamstring ruptures: does the tendon heal? Am J Sports Med 40:2325–2330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen SB, Rangavajjula A, Vyas D, Bradley JP (2012) Functional results and outcomes after repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. Am J Sports Med 40:2092–2098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Enright PL (2003) The six-minute walk test. Respir Care 48:783–785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Folsom GJ, Larson CM (2008) Surgical treatment of acute versus chronic complete proximal hamstring ruptures: results of a new allograft technique for chronic reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 36:104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gajdosik R, Lusin G (1983) Hamstring muscle tightness. Reliability of an active-knee-extension test. Phys Ther 63:1085–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guanche CA (2015) Hamstring injuries. J Hip Preserv Surg 2:116–122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris JD, Griesser MJ, Best TM, Ellis TJ (2011) Treatment of proximal hamstring ruptures—a systematic review. Int J Sports Med 32:490–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koulouris G, Connell D (2003) Evaluation of the hamstring muscle complex following acute injury. Skeletal Radiol 32:582–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuske B, Hamilton DF, Pattle SB, Simpson AH (2016) Patterns of hamstring muscle tears in the general population: a systematic review. PLoS One 11:e0152855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lempainen L, Sarimo J, Orava S (2007) Recurrent and chronic complete ruptures of the proximal origin of the hamstring muscles repaired with fascia lata autograft augmentation. Arthroscopy 23:441.e441–441.e445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marx RG, Fives G, Chu SK, Daluiski A, Wolfe SW (2009) Allograft reconstruction for symptomatic chronic complete proximal hamstring tendon avulsion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta SP, Fulton A, Quach C, Thistle M, Toledo C, Evans NA (2016) Measurement properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 46:200–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moatshe G, Chahla J, Vap AR, Ferrari M, Sanchez G, Mitchell JJ, LaPrade RF (2017) Repair of proximal hamstring tears: a surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech 6:e311–e317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Muellner T, Kumar S, Singla A (2017) Proximal hamstring reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis autograft: a novel technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:112–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray PJ, Lowe WR (2009) Achilles allograft reconstruction of a chronic complete proximal hamstring rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1360–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19:513–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orava S, Kujala UM (1995) Rupture of the ischial origin of the hamstring muscles. Am J Sports Med 23:702–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW, Alcock GK, Giffin JR (2007) Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 87:337–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rust DA, Giveans MR, Stone RM, Samuelson KM, Larson CM (2014) Functional outcomes and return to sports after acute repair, chronic repair, and allograft reconstruction for proximal hamstring ruptures. Am J Sports Med 42:1377–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarimo J, Lempainen L, Mattila K, Orava S (2008) Complete proximal hamstring avulsions: a series of 41 patients with operative treatment. Am J Sports Med 36:1110–1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Skaara HE, Moksnes H, Frihagen F, Stuge B (2013) Self-reported and performance-based functional outcomes after surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. Am J Sports Med 41:2577–2584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Subbu R, Benjamin-Laing H, Haddad F (2015) Timing of surgery for complete proximal hamstring avulsion injuries: successful clinical outcomes at 6 weeks, 6 months, and after 6 months of injury. Am J Sports Med 43:385–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomsen NO, Jensen TT (1999) Late repair of rupture of the hamstring tendons from the ischial tuberosity—a case report. Acta Orthop Scand 70:89–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wood DG, Packham I, Trikha SP, Linklater J (2008) Avulsion of the proximal hamstring origin. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2365–2374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay R. Ebert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no individual conflicts.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was obtained by the Hollywood Private Hospital (HPH432) and the University of Western Australia (RA/4/1/8829).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebert, J.R., Gormack, N. & Annear, P.T. Reconstruction of chronic proximal hamstring avulsion injuries using ipsilateral distal hamstring tendons results in good clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2958–2966 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5310-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5310-y

Keywords

Navigation