Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recovery of ACL function after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization is resultant to restoration of ACL integrity and scar tissue formation

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) is recognized as a ligament preserving technique for the treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the integrity and morphology of the recovered ACL after DIS repair.

Methods

The cohort comprised 47 patients with an acute proximal ACL rupture undergoing DIS repair. All patients underwent diagnostic arthroscopy after a minimum postoperative interval of 6 months for semi-quantitative evaluation of ACL integrity, function and scar tissue formation. Tegner, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores as well as objective anteroposterior (ap) translation were assessed at 6 weeks, 3-, 6-  and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Full restoration of the ACL volume was affirmed in 30 (63.8%) patients and two-third restoration in 13 (27.7%). Hypertrophic scar formation was observed in 23 (48.9%) patients. Forty-four patients (93.6%) demonstrated sufficient ACL tensioning intraoperatively upon anterior stress. At final follow-up, the median Tegner activity level was 5.5 (3–10), Lysholm and IKDC scores were 100 (64–100) and 94 (55–100) points, respectively. The mean ap-translation differed from the normal knee by 2.1 ± 2.2 mm. Deficient ACL recovery was noted in four patients (8.5%), none of which required secondary reconstructive surgery.

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that clinical recovery of ACL function after DIS repair is resultant to both restoration of ACL volume and scar tissue formation. Factors influencing the degree of scar tissue formation need further investigation to enable future attempts of guiding a balanced biological healing response.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad SS, Meyer JC, Krismer AM, Ahmad SS, Evangelopoulos DS, Hoppe S et al (2017) Outcome measures in clinical ACL studies: an analysis of highly cited level I trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(5):1517–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ateschrang A, Döbele S, Freude T, Stöckle U, Schröter S, Kraus TM (2016) Acute MCL and ACL injuries: first results of minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with combined ACL single-bundle reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1265–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2. Am J Sports Med 33:1751–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med 33:1579–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bierbaum M, Schoffski O, Schliemann B, Kosters C (2017) Cost-utility analysis of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus early reconstruction after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Health Econ Rev 7(1):8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Robak OR, Molster A, Viset AT, Engebretsen L (2006) A sixteen-year follow-up of three operative techniques for the treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:944–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eggli S, Kohlhof H, Zumstein M, Henle P, Hartel M, Evangelopoulos DS et al (2015) Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1215–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eggli S, Roder C, Perler G, Henle P (2016) Five year results of the first ten ACL patients treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Evangelopoulos DS, Kohl S, Schwienbacher S, Gantenbein B, Exadaktylos A, Ahmad SS (2015) Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3838-7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT (2011) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:199–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J (2001) Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy 17:971–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohl S, Evangelopoulos D, Kohlhof H, Hartel M, Bonel H, Henle P et al (2013) Anterior crucial ligament rupture: self-healing through dynamic intraligamentary stabilization technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohl S, Evangelopoulos D, Schär M, Bieri K, Müller T, Ahmad S (2016) Dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation. Bone Jt J 98:793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krismer AM, Gousopoulos L, Kohl S, Ateschrang A, Kohlhof H, Ahmad SS (2017) Factors influencing the success of anterior cruciate ligament repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4445-6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Louboutin H, Debarge R, Richou J, Selmi TAS, Donell ST, Neyret P et al (2009) Osteoarthritis in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a review of risk factors. Knee 16:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schliemann B, Lenschow S, Domnick C, Herbort M, Häberli J, Schulze M et al (2017) Knee joint kinematics after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: cadaveric study on a novel anterior cruciate ligament repair technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(4):1184–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steadman JR, Matheny LM, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Carreira DS (2012) Outcomes following healing response in older, active patients: a primary anterior cruciate ligament repair technique. J Knee Surg 25:255–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sufian S. Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was received for the conduction of this study.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional ethical review board of the Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and was given the ID number 431/2013BO1.

Informed consent

Informed consent was received by each study participant.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 8317 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 8138 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ateschrang, A., Ahmad, S.S., Stöckle, U. et al. Recovery of ACL function after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization is resultant to restoration of ACL integrity and scar tissue formation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 589–595 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4656-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4656-x

Keywords

Navigation