Skip to main content
Log in

Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was the evaluation of long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of non-operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. The hypothesis was that conservative treatment would be associated with a deterioration of subjective and objective measures of joint health and disability over time.

Methods

From an initial sample of 41 patients conservatively treated for ACL rupture, 10 received secondary ACL reconstruction, 1 was excluded due to contralateral ACL injury, and 1 patient required total knee replacement and a high tibial osteotomy. Seven further patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 21 patients (15 male, 6 female, mean age 53.1 ± 9.2 years at the last follow-up) were evaluated by the same two examiners 5–7, 10–13 and 20–22 years after the injury. The evaluation was based on objective and subjective scores, instrumented testing, radiographic examination and assessment of sports activity.

Results

While subjective patient satisfaction improved over time, objective scores stayed constant or deteriorated (radiologic evaluation). Instrumented knee laxity testing showed an initial tendency to increasing instability, followed by a decrease in anterior tibial translation in the second half of the observation period. Physical activity levels, particularly in high-risk sports, decreased significantly (p < 0.05) compared to preinjury levels. All patients developed significant arthritic degenerative changes over time compared to the uninjured contralateral knee. No correlation to activities in high- or low-risk pivoting sports was found.

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction with conservative treatment of ACL injuries is good in spite of objective measures indicating increasing degenerative changes.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen CR, Livesay GA, Wong EK, Woo SL (1999) Injury and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 7:110–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eastlack ME, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (1999) Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:210–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 30B:664–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fink C, Hoser C, Benedetto KP (1994) Development of arthrosis after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of surgical and conservative therapy. Unfallchirurg 97:357–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink C, Hoser C, Benedetto KP (1993) Sports capacity after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament–surgical versus non-surgical therapy. Aktuelle Traumatol 23:371–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fink C, Hoser C, Hackl W, Navarro RA, Benedetto KP (2001) Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture—is sports activity a determining variable? Int J Sports Med 22:304–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foster A, Butcher C, Turner PG (2005) Changes in arthroscopic findings in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee prior to reconstructive surgery. Knee 12:33–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS (2010) A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med 363:331–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kannus P, Jarvinen M (1987) Conservatively treated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1007–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krogsgaard MR, Brodersen J, Comins J (2011) A scientific approach to optimal treatment of cruciate ligament injuries. Acta Orthop 82:389–390 (discussion 390–382)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Louboutin H, Debarge R, Richou J, Selmi TA, Donell ST, Neyret P et al (2009) Osteoarthritis in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a review of risk factors. Knee 16:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S (2006) Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee 13:184–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moksnes H, Risberg MA (2009) Performance-based functional evaluation of non-operative and operative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 19:345–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray MM, Fleming BC (2013) Biology of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair: Kappa delta ann doner vaughn award paper 2013. J Orthop Res 31:1501–1506

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nebelung W, Wuschech H (2005) 35 years of follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees in high-level athletes. Arthroscopy 21:696–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37:1434–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oiestad BE, Holm I, Aune AK, Gunderson R, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L et al (2010) Knee function and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study with 10–15 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38:2201–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:752–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Snyder-Mackler L, Fitzgerald GK, Bartolozzi AR 3rd, Ciccotti MG (1997) The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 25:191–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sonesson S, Kvist J (2017) Dynamic and static tibial translation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency initially treated with a structured rehabilitation protocol. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2337–2346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Strehl A, Eggli S (2007) The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). J Trauma 62:1159–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Bringmann C, Siebert M, Reiser M, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F et al (2004) Femoro-tibial and menisco-tibial translation patterns in patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament deficiency—a potential cause of secondary meniscal tears. J Orthop Res 22:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamazaki J, Engebretsen L (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament surgery: risk factors for development of osteoarthritis: What can we do to prevent it? In: Sanchis-Alfonso V, Monllau JC (eds) The ACL-deficient knee: a problem solving approach. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 41–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank PD Dr. Robert Csapo for his statistical support as well as for his help in the preparation of the final manuscript. The authors also thank Dr. Caroline Hepperger for her help with the final manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Runer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Christan Fink receives royalties from Karl Storz and consultancies from Karl Storz, Medacta and Zimmer BioMed. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The IRB approval for this study was waived by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gföller, P., Abermann, E., Runer, A. et al. Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2665–2671 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5296-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5296-5

Keywords

Navigation