Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combined chronic anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: functional and clinical results

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstarct

Purpose

Multiligamentous injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is an uncommon but debilitating event. Patients with combined ligament injuries typically complain of painful, debilitating knee instability that restricts their sports and daily activities. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate functional and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic ACL and PCL deficiency who underwent simultaneous single-stage arthroscopic reconstruction of the central pivot.

Methods

Medical records of 20 consecutive patients with chronic ACL and PCL deficiency who underwent simultaneous single-stage arthroscopic reconstruction of the central pivot were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had received either an allograft (group A) or a semitendinosus–gracilis graft for ACL repair and a bone–patellar tibial–bone graft for PCL repair (group B). Functional outcomes, after the initial follow-up period at 24-month FU, were assessed with concentric isokinetic knee extensor–flexor testing at 60 and 180°/s. The secondary aim was to compare long-term clinical recovery by the administration of the IKDC (International Knee Document Committee) Knee Ligament Evaluation Form, the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale.

Results

The mean per cent quadriceps strength deficit in the operated as compared to the healthy knee was 13.5 % in group A and 15 % in group B (angular velocity 60°/s) and 13.5 % in group A and 9.4 % in group B (angular velocity 180°/s). The mean per cent flexor strength deficit in the operated as compared to the healthy knee was 10.4 % in group A and 12.3 % in group B (angular velocity 60°/s) and 12.2 % in group A and 9 % in group B (angular velocity of 180°/s). The flexor–quadriceps ratio was 49.4 % in group A and 48.8 % in group B in the healthy knee and 53.2 % in group A and 53.8 % in group B in the operated knee (angular velocity 60°/s) and 63.9 % in group A and 60.7 % in group B in the healthy knee and 65 % in group A and 64.9 % in group B in the operated knee (angular velocity 180°/s). Lysholm outcome was 93.9 ± 3.9 in group A and 89.1 ± 7.6 in group B (n.s). Cincinnati score was 89.6 ± 7.3 in group A and 91.0 ± 6.9 in group B (p = 0.791). IKDC results were group A in six patients (60 %), group B in three patients (30 %) and group C in one patient (10 %) in the allograft group and group A in seven patients (70 %) and group B in three patients (30 %) for autologous group.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that one-stage arthroscopic bicruciate ligament reconstruction can restore good knee joint function. Surgical treatment should be followed by a comprehensive rehabilitation programme with specific goals, objectives and strategies, including pain management and assessment of progress in recovery of joint function and perception of knee stability.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arøen A, Sivertsen ES, Owesen C, Engebretsen L, Granan LP (2013) An isolated rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament results in reduced preoperative knee function in comparison with an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5):1017–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frosch KH, Preiss A, Heider S, Stengel D, Wohlmuth P, Hoffmann MF, Lill H (2013) Primary ligament sutures as a treatment option of knee dislocations: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(7):1502–1509

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart JM, Blancharrd BF, Hart JA, Montgomery SC, Schonderbek R, Miller MD (2009) Multiple ligament knee reconstruction clinical follow-up and gait analysis. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc 17:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1(3–4):226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkins PJ, Clifton R, Gillespie GN, Will EM, Keating JF (2011) Strength and function recovery after multiple-ligament reconstruction of the Knee. Injury. Int J Care Injured 43:1426–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kannus P (1994) Isokinetic evaluation of muscular performance. Implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation. Int J Sports Med 15:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannus P, Bergefeld J, Jarvinen M, Johnson RJ, Pope M, Renstrom P et al (1991) Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Sports Med 12:10–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mariani PP, Becker R, Rhin J, Margheritini F (2003) Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injury. An anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review. Knee 10:311–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1997) Reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments after knee dislocation. Use of early protected postoperative motion to decrease arthrofibrosis. Am J Sports Med 25:769–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noyes FR, McGinnis GH, Grood ES (1985) The variable functional disability of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Orthop Clin of North Am 16:47–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierce CM, O’Brien L, Wohlt Griffin L, LaPrade R (2013) Posterior cruciate ligament tears: functional and postoperative rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5):1071–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Strobel MJ, Schulz MS, Petersen WJ, Eichhorn HJ (2006) Combined anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction with autogenous hamstring grafts in chronic instabilities. Arthroscopy 22:182–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takaes IG, Inada MM, de Miranda JB, Cunha SA, Piedade SR (2014) Isokinetic evaluation after two-stage bicruciate reconstruction. Acta Orthop Bras 22:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of the knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Rel Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tornese D, Bandi M, Volpi P, Schonhuber H, Denti M, Ricci G, Melegati G (2008) Patellar tendon graft vs Semitendinosus and Gracilis graft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an isokinetic and functional study one year after the operation. Isokinet Exerc Sci 16:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tzurbakis M, Diamantopoulos A, Xenakis T, Georgoulis A (2006) Surgical treatment of multiple knee ligament injuries in 44 patients: 2–8 years follow up results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:739–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Young A, Hughes I, Round JM, Edwards RH (1982) The effect of knee injury on the number of muscle fibres in the human quadriceps femoris. Clin Sci 62:227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao J, He Y, Wang J (2006) Simultaneous arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament with autogenous hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 22:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zorzi C, Alam M, Iacono V, Madonna V, Rosa D, Maffulli N (2013) Combined PCL and PLC reconstruction in chronic posterolateral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5):1036–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Knee Surgery and Sports Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy

    Matteo Denti, Alessandro Quaglia & Piero Volpi

  2. Center for Sports Rehabilitation, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, Milan, Italy

    Davide Tornese

  3. Rehabilitation I Unit, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, Milan, Italy

    Gianluca Melegati

  4. Sports Traumatology and Arthroscopic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, Milan, Italy

    Herbert Schonhuber

Authors
  1. Matteo Denti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davide Tornese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gianluca Melegati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Herbert Schonhuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alessandro Quaglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Piero Volpi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Quaglia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denti, M., Tornese, D., Melegati, G. et al. Combined chronic anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: functional and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 2853–2858 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3764-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3764-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation