Skip to main content
Log in

Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of present study was to introduce a modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft for arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction and investigate the clinical outcomes.

Methods

From 2007 to 2009, a total of 136 patients underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstructions with BPTB allograft. Of which, 66 patients were with double-layer BPTB allograft (Group 1), and 70 patients were with conventional BPTB allograft (Group 2). Clinical outcomes including Lachman and pivot-shift tests, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, and Lysholm and Tegner activity scores were compared between the two groups at a 2-year minimum follow-up.

Results

Forty-six patients in each group were at a two-year minimum follow-up. The mean side-to-side difference on the KT-1000 arthrometer was 1.2 ± 1.2 mm for group 1 and 2.1 ± 1.9 mm for group 2, with significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.017). The knee function was significantly better for group 1 than for group 2, because the mean Lysholm score was 94.2 ± 4.8 points versus 86.6 ± 7.1 points (p = 0.000), and the median Tegner score was 8 (range 5–10) points versus 6 (range 4–10) points (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

On the basis of the KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation and clinical measures, single-bundle ACL reconstruction with double-layer BPTB allograft achieves significantly lesser anterior laxity and better knee function than a single-layer allograft reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic, retrospective comparative study, Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N (2010) Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Araujo PH, van Eck CF, Macalena JA, Fu FH (2011) Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1239–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber FA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Oro FB (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft: an age-dependent outcome evaluation. Arthroscopy 26:488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Olmstead ML, Hohn RB, Arnoczky SP, Siegel MG (1989) Mechanical properties of primate vascularized vs nonvascularized patellar tendon grafts: changes over time. J Orthop Res 7:68–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper DE (1998) Biomechanical properties of the central third patellar tendon graft: effect of rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S16–S19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burnstein AL (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21:818–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Tegnander A (2005) Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts fixed with bioabsorbable or metal interference screws: a prospective randomized study of the clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 33:1160–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grood ES, Walz-Hasselfeld KA, Holden JP, Noyes FR, Levy MS, Butler DL, Jackson DW, Drez DJ (1992) The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Orthop Res 6:878–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo L, Yang L, Duan XJ, He R, Chen GX, Wang FY, Zhang Y (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: comparison of autograft, fresh-frozen allograft, and γ-irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy 28:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC (1999) Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:549–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SJ, Chang JH, Kim TW, Jo SB, Oh KS (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single or double-bundle technique in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laoruengthana A, Pattayakorn S, Chotanaputhi T, Kosiyatrakul A (2009) Clinical comparison between six-strand hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Med Assoc Thai 92:491–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marder RA, Raskind JR, Carroll M (1991) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 19:478–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marrale J, Morrissey MC, Haddad FS (2007) A literature review of autograft and allograft: anterior ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:690–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ménétrey J, Duthon VB, Laumonier T, Fritschy D (2008) “Biological failure” of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H (1997) Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med 25:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers P, Logan M, Stokes A, Boyd K, Watts M (2008) Bioabsorbable versus titanium interference screws with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 24:817–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng GY, Oakes BW, Deacon OW, McLean ID, Lampard D (1995) Biomechanics of patellar tendon autograft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the goat: 3-year study. J Orthop Res 13:602–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A, Kanagawa H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2011) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon graft: a comparative study with 2-year follow-up results of semitendinosus tendon grafts alone or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 27:1242–1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noyes FR, Grood ES (1976) The strength of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and Rhesus monkeys. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:1074–1082

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Prodromos C, Joyce B, Shi K (2007) A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:851–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pujol N, Fong O, Karoubi M, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P (2010) Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saddemi SR, Frogameni AD, Fenton PJ, Hartman J, Hartman W (1993) Comparison of perioperative morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament autografts versus allografts. Arthroscopy 9:519–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadoghi P, Kröpfl A, Jansson V, Müller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaieb M, Kan D, Chang S, Marumoto J, Richardson A (2002) A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shino K, Nakata K, Horibe S, Inoue M, Nakagawa S (1993) Quantitative evaluation after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 4:609–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH, Xia CS, Zhang CL, Yu TB (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 25:750–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex: the effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med 19:217–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Shoda E, Kuroda R, Shimizu K, Yamamoto T (2003) Cross-sectional area of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 16:75–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Marcacci M (2011) Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:390–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao J, He Y, Wang J (2004) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 23:766–770

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors have read and contributed to the submitted manuscript and there is no conflict of interest among the authors.

Ethical board review statement

This material has not been published and is not under consideration elsewhere. This study receives no financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, H.J., Su, Y.L., Cao, H.J. et al. Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2066–2071 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2235-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2235-8

Keywords

Navigation