Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone graft

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy has become the trend for correction of varus knee deformities. The drawbacks were the need of autogenous bone graft with its associated morbidity, and later the use of bone substitutes with their cost and delayed healing. In this study, a total of 58 consecutive patients underwent high tibial osteotomy with internal fixation by wedge (toothed) plate and screws without bone graft, from 2004 to 2008. Age of the patients ranged from 24 to 65 years. There were 37 women and 21 men. The osteotomy opening size ranged from 8 to 14 mm. The mean follow-up was 38 months. The osteotomy united in all patients. Average time to union was 12.4 weeks (range 8–16 weeks). Partial loss of correction occurred in one osteotomy. There was significant difference between the healing time and the size of the osteotomy opening. The results at the final follow-up using the HSS score were excellent in 51 knees (88%) and good in seven knees (12%). Despite the routine addition of bone graft as a part of the high tibial osteotomy procedure, this study supports medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy up to 14 mm without bone graft or bone substitutes, which shortens the operative time and avoids unnecessary morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diag 277(Suppl):2–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aryee S, Imhoff AB, Rose T, Tischer T (2008) Do we need synthetic osteotomy augmentation materials for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Biomaterials 29:3497–3502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1548–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown G, Amendola A (2000) Radiographic evaluation and preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomies. Oper Tech Sports Med 8:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Pre-operative planning for high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 274:248–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esenkaya I, Elmali N (2006) Proximal tibia medial open-wedge osteotomy using plates with wedges: early results in 58 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:955–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franco V, Cerullo G, Cipolla M, Gianni E, Puddu G (2002) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Tech Knee Surg 1:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee: an arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am 10:585–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartford JM, Hester P, Watt PM et al (2003) Biomechanical superiority of plate fixation for proximal tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 412:125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:754–765

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klinger HM, Lorenz F, Härer T (2001) Open wedge tibial osteotomy by hemicallotasis for medial compartiment osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:245–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koshino T, Murase T, Saito T (2003) Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of porous hydroxyapatite to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:78–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kraal T, Mullender M, de Bruine JHD, Reinhard R, de Gast A, Kuik DJ, van Royen BJ (2008) Resorbability of rigid beta-tricalcium phosphate wedges in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective radiological study. Knee 15:201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lobenhoffer P, De Simoni C, Staubli AE (2002) Open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy with rigid plate fixation. Tech Knee Surg 1:93–105

    Google Scholar 

  17. Müller M, Strecker W (2008) Arthroscopy prior to osteotomy around the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1217–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naudie DD, Amendola A, Fowler PJ (2004) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for symptomatic hyperextension-varus thrust. Am J Sports Med 32:60–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:752–757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Puddu G (2004) High tibial osteotomy (the arthritic knee in the young athlete, SYM 15). In: Abstracts book of 11th ESSKA congress and 4th world congress on sports Trauma, Athens, Greece, pp 446–467

  21. Sgaglione NA, Moynihan DP, Uggen C (2007) The use of allografts in high tibial osteotomy: opening wedge technique. Oper Tech Sports Med 15:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spahn G (2004) Complications in high tibial (medial opening wedge) osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:649–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spahn G, Wittig R (2002) Primary stability of various implants in tibial opening wedge osteotomy: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Sci 7:683–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibiaV early results in 92 cases. Injury 34(Suppl 2):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stoffel K, Stachowiak G, Kuster M (2004) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: biomechanical investigation of the modified Arthrex Osteotomy Plate (Puddu Plate) and the TomoFix Plate. Clin Biomech 19:944–950

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trieb K, Grohs J, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Stulnig T, Panotopoulos J, Wanivenhaus A (2006) Age predicts outcome of high-tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:149–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Hemert WL, Willems K, Anderson PG, van Heerwaarden RJ, Wymenga AB (2004) Tricalcium phosphate granules or rigid wedge preforms in open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study with a new evaluation system. Knee 11:451–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Raaij TM, Brouwer RW, de Vlieger R, Reijman M, Verhaar JAN (2008) Opposite cortical fracture in high tibial osteotomy: lateral closing compared to the medial opening wedge technique. Acta Orthop 79:508–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Warden SJ, Morris HG, Crossley KM, Brukner PD, Bennell KL (2005) Delayed- and non-union following opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: surgeons’ results from 182 completed cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  30. Younger EM, Chapman MW (1989) Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 3:192–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaser E. Khalifa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Assal, M.A., Khalifa, Y.E., Abdel-Hamid, M.M. et al. Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 961–966 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1104-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1104-6

Keywords

Navigation