Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CT changes after trochleoplasty for symptomatic trochlear dysplasia

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Trochlear dysplasia is an important risk factor for patellar instability. Because of a decreased trochlear depth in combination with a low lateral femoral condyle, the patella cannot engage properly in the trochlea. Trochleoplasty is a surgical procedure, which strives to correct such bony abnormalities. The aim of this study was to describe morphological features of trochlear dysplasia and the corrective changes after trochleoplasty on CT scan. The study group consists of 17 knees with trochlear dysplasia having undergone trochleoplasty for recurrent patellofemoral dislocation at a mean age of 22.4 years. The evaluation consisted in pre- and postoperative measurements on the proximal and distal trochlea on transverse CT scans in order to determine the morphological features. We measured the transverse position and depth of the trochlear groove, the transverse position of the patella, the ratio between the posterior patellar edge and the trochlear groove, the lateral patellar inclination angle, the sulcus angle, and the lateral trochlear slope. The trochlear groove lateralised a mean of 6.1 mm in the proximal aspect and 2.5 mm in the distal aspect of the trochlea, while the patella medialised a mean of 5 mm. Preoperatively the patella was lateral in relation to the trochlear groove in 13 cases, neutral in two cases, and medial in two cases. Postoperatively it was lateral in four cases, in neutral position in seven cases, and medialised in six cases, referenced to the trochlear groove. The trochlear depth increased from 0  to 5.9 mm postoperatively in the proximal aspect of the trochlea, and from 5.5  to 8.3 mm postoperatively in the distal trochlea. The lateral patellar inclination angle decreased from a mean of 21.9° to a mean of 7.8°. The sulcus angle decreased from a mean of 172.1° to a mean of 133° in the proximal trochlea and from a mean of 141.9° to a mean of 121.7° in the distal trochlea. The lateral trochlear slope changed from 2.8° to 22.7° in the proximal and from 14.9° to 26.9° in the distal part of the trochlea. In the CT scan patients with trochlear dysplasia demonstrated a poor depth, or even a flat or convex trochlea with a greater sulcus and lateral trochlear slope angle, a lateralised patella to the trochlear groove with poor congruency, and a greater lateral patellar inclination angle. Trochleoplasty can correct the pathological features of trochlear dysplasia by surgically creating more normal anatomy. The goal of this surgical procedure is to steepen and lateralise the trochlear groove for a better engagement of the patella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Biase P, Giron F (1994) Surgical treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella. Clin Orthop 8–17

  2. Albee FH (1915) The bone graft wedge in the treatment of habitual dislocation of patella. Med Rec 88:257–259

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, Senavongse W, Thomas NP (2003) Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 10:215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaconsfield T, Pintore E, Maffulli N, Petri GJ (1994) Radiological measurements in patellofemoral disorders: a review. Clin Orthop 308:18–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bereiter H, Gautier E (1994) [The trochleaplasty as a surgical therapy of recurrent dislocation of the patella in dysplastic trochlea of the femur]. Arthroskopie 7:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brattstrom H (1965) Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of the patella. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 68:1–144

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brossmann J, Muhle C, Bull CC, Schroder C, Melchert UH, Zieplies J, Spielmann RP, Heller M (1994) Evaluation of patellar tracking in patients with suspected patellar malalignment: cine MR imaging vs arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:361–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brossmann J, Muhle C, Schroder C, Melchert UH, Bull CC, Spielmann RP, Heller M (1993) Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension: evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging. Radiology 187:205–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrillon Y, Abidi H, Dejour D, Fantino O, Moyen B, Tran-Minh VA (2000) Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience. Radiology 216:582–585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davies AP, Costa ML, Shepstone L, Glasgow MM, Donell S (2000) The sulcus angle and malalignment of the extensor mechanism of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1162–1166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Diks MJ, Wymenga AB, Anderson PG (2003) Patients with lateral tracking patella have better pain relief following CT-guided tuberosity transfer than patients with unstable patella. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:384–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Drew D (1908) Dislocation of patella. Proc R Soc Med 1:11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Rubinstein D, Humphries S (2003) Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality. Part II. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A Suppl 4:97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Cohen AB (2004) Indications in the treatment of patellar instability. J Knee Surg 17:47–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Silva P, Davis DK, Elias DA, White LM (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32:1114–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fulkerson JP (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med 30:447–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Galland O, Walch G, Dejour H, Carret JP (1990) An anatomical and radiological study of the femoropatellar articulation. Surg Radiol Anat 12:119–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Lecudonnec B (1978) [The measurement of the tibial tuberosity. Patella groove distanced technique and results]. Rev Chir Orthop 64:423–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harilainen A, Sandelin J (1993) Prospective long-term results of operative treatment in primary dislocation of the patella. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:100–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koeter S, Bongers EM, de Rooij J, van Kampen A (2006) Minimal rotation aberrations cause radiographic misdiagnosis of trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1–5

  22. Malghem J, Maldague B (1989) Depth insufficiency of the proximal trochlear groove on lateral radiographs of the knee: relation to patellar dislocation. Radiology 170:507–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez S, Korobkin M, Fondren FB, Hedlund LW, Goldner JL (1983) Computed tomography of the normal patellofemoral joint. Invest Radiol 18:249–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez S, Korobkin M, Fondren FB, Hedlund LW, Goldner JL (1983) Diagnosis of patellofemoral malalignment by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:1050–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Masse Y (1978) [Trochleoplasty. Restoration of the intercondylar groove in subluxations and dislocations of the patella]. Rev Chir Orthop 64:3–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nomura E, Horiuchi Y, Kihara M (2000) Medial patellofemoral ligament restraint in lateral patellar translation and reconstruction. Knee 7:121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pollard B (1891) Old dislocation of patella reduced by intra articular operation. Lancet 1:988

    Google Scholar 

  28. Powers CM, Shellock FG, Pfaff M (1998) Quantification of patellar tracking using kinematic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:724–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Powers CM, Ward SR, Fredericson M, Guillet M, Shellock FG (2003) Patellofemoral kinematics during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee extension in persons with lateral subluxation of the patella: a preliminary study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33:677–685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reikeras O (1992) Patellofemoral characteristics in patients with increased femoral anteversion. Skeletal Radiol 21:311–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schneider T, Menke W, Fink B, Ruther W, Schulitz KP (1997) Recurrent dislocation of the patella and the Goldthwait operation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:46–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schottle PB, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann C, Bereiter H, Romero J (2005) Trochleaplasty for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia. Acta Orthop 76:693–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schutzer SF, Ramsby GR, Fulkerson JP (1986) Computed tomographic classification of patellofemoral pain patients. Orthop Clin North Am 17:235–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shih YF, Bull AM, Amis AA (2004) The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:300–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shih YF, Bull AM, McGregor AH, Humphries K, Amis AA (2003) A technique for the measurement of patellar tracking during weight-bearing activities using ultrasound. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 217:449–457

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smirk C, Morris H (2003) The anatomy and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 10:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Steensen RN, Dopirak RM, McDonald WG 3rd (2004) The anatomy and isometry of the medial patellofemoral ligament: implications for reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:1509–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tuneu J, Walch G (1987) Le scanner dans la pathologie femoro-patellaire. In: La pathologie femoro-patellaire:35–41

  39. Verdonk R, Jansegers E, Stuyts B (2005) Trochleoplasty in dysplastic knee trochlea. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:529–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Balgrist Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland

    S. F. Fucentese, P. B. Schöttle & J. Romero

  2. Radiological Department, University Hospital Balgrist Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland

    C. W. A. Pfirrmann

Authors
  1. S. F. Fucentese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. B. Schöttle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. W. A. Pfirrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. F. Fucentese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fucentese, S.F., Schöttle, P.B., Pfirrmann, C.W.A. et al. CT changes after trochleoplasty for symptomatic trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15, 168–174 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0140-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0140-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation