Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design optimization of real-size steel frames using monitored convergence curve

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is an undeniable fact that there are main challenges in the use of metaheuristics for optimal design of real-size steel frames in practice. In general, steel frame optimization problems usually require an inordinate amount of processing time where the main portion of computational effort is devoted to myriad structural response computations during the optimization iterations. Moreover, the inherent complexity of steel frame optimization problems may result in poor performance of even contemporary or advanced metaheuristics. Beside the challenging nature of such problems, significant difference in geometrical properties of two adjacent steel sections in a list of available profiles can also mislead the optimization algorithm and may result in trapping the algorithm in a poor local optimum. Consequently, akin to other challenging engineering optimization instances, significant fluctuations could be observed in the final results of steel frame optimization problems over multiple runs even using contemporary metaheuristics. Accordingly, the main focus of this study is to improve the solution quality as well as the stability of results in metaheuristic optimization of real-size steel frames using a recently developed framework so-called monitored convergence curve (MCC). Two enhanced variants of the well-known big bang-big crunch algorithm are adopted as typical contemporary metaheuristic algorithms to evaluate the usefulness of the MCC framework in steel frame optimization problems. The numerical experiments using challenging test examples of real-size steel frames confirm the efficiency of the MCC integrated metaheuristics versus their standard counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeli H, Cheng NT (1994) Concurrent genetic algorithms for optimization of large structures. J Aerospace Eng ASCE 7(3):276–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (1994) Manual of steel construction, load & resistance factor design (LRFD), 2nd edition, Chicago

  • ASCE 7-98 (2000) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures: revision of ANSI/ASCE 7–95. American Society of Civil Engineers

  • Cai J, Thierauf G (1996) A parallel evolution strategy for solving discrete structural optimization. Adv Eng Softw:91–96

  • Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V (1991) Distributed optimization by ant colony. In: Proceedings of the first European Conference on Artificial Life, USA, p 134–142

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol OK, Eksin I (2006) A new optimization method: big bang-big crunch. Adv Eng Softw 37:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flager F, Soremekun G, Adya A, Shea K, Haymaker J, Fischer M (2014a) Fully constrained design: a general and scalable method for discrete member sizing optimization of steel truss structures. Comput Struct 140:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flager F, Adya A, Haymaker J, Fischer M (2014b) A bi-level hierarchical method for shape and member sizing optimization of steel truss structures. Comput Struct 131:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh S, Aligholizadeh V (2019) Reliability-based optimum seismic design of RC frames by a metamodel and metaheuristics. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 28:e1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Samtani MP (1986) Engineering optimization via genetic algorithm. Proceeding of the Ninth Conference on Electronic Computation. ASCE 471–82

  • Haftka RT, Villanueva D, Chaudhuri A (2016) Parallel surrogate-assisted global optimization with expensive functions—a survey. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54:3–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2012) An exponential big bang-big crunch algorithm for discrete design optimization of steel frames. Comput Struct 110–111:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2014) Discrete size optimization of steel trusses using a refined big bang–big crunch algorithm. Eng Optim 46(1):61–83

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Çarbas S, Dogan E, Erdal F, Saka MP (2010) Comparison of non-deterministic search techniques in the optimum design of real size steel frames. Comput Struct 88:1033–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Bahçecioğlu T, Kurç Ö, Saka MP (2011) Optimum design of high-rise steel buildings using an evolution strategy integrated parallel algorithm. Comput Struct 89:2039–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) Optimal design of Schwedler and ribbed domes via hybrid big bang–big crunch algorithm. J Constr Steel Res 66(3):412–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh AS (2018) Seeding the initial population with feasible solutions in metaheuristic optimization of steel trusses. Eng Optim 50:89–105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S (2019) Monitored convergence curve: a new framework for metaheuristic structural optimization algorithms. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(2):481–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2014) Optimum design of skeletal structures using metaheuristics: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Int J Eng Appl Sci 6(3):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2015) Computationally efficient discrete sizing of steel frames via guided stochastic search heuristic. Comput Struct 156:12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2013) Upper bound strategy for metaheuristic based design optimization of steel frames. Adv Eng Softw 57:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2016) Structural optimization using big bang-big crunch algorithm: a review. Int J Optim Civil Eng 6(3):433–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks. IEEE Press, 1942–48

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gerlatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti L, Pappalettere C (2011) Metaheuristic design optimization of skeletal structures: a review. Comput Technol Rev:1–32

  • Le Riche R, Haftka RT (1993) Optimization of laminate stacking sequence for buckling load maximization by genetic algorithm. AIAA J 31(5):951–956

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Geem ZW (2004) A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput Struct 82:781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu LJ, Huang CW (2000) Reanalysis-based optimal design of trusses. Int J Numer Methods Eng 49:1007–1028

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wang H, Li G (2018) Reanalysis assisted metaheuristic optimization for free vibration problems of composite laminates. Compos Struct 206:380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire W (1968) Steel structures. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

  • Migdalas A, Toraldo G, Kumar V (2003) Nonlinear optimization and parallel computing. Parallel Comput 29:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki M (2001) Random search method based on exact reanalysis for topology optimization of trusses with discrete cross-sectional areas. Comput Struct 79:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos PM (1989) Parallel search algorithms in global optimization. Appl Math Comput 29:219–229

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prada A, Gasparella A, Baggio P (2018) On the performance of meta-models in building design optimization. Appl Energy 225:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prayogo D, Cheng MY, Wu YW, Herdany AA, Prayogo H (2018) Differential big bang-big crunch algorithm for construction engineering design optimization. Autom Constr 85:290–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram L, Sharma D (2017) Evolutionary and GPU computing for topology optimization of structures. Swarm Evol Comput 35:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka MP (2007) Optimum design of steel frames using stochastic search techniques based on natural phenomena: a review. In: Topping BHV (ed) Civil engineering computations: tools and techniques. Saxe-Coburg Publications, Stirlingshire, pp 105–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saka MP, Geem ZW (2013) Mathematical and metaheuristic applications in design optimization of steel frame structures: an extensive review. Math Probl Eng 2013 Article ID: 271031, 33 pages

  • Schutte JF, Haftka RT, Fregly BJ (2007) Improved global convergence probability using multiple independent optimizations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 71(6):678–702

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwefel H-P (1981) Numerical optimization of computer models. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW, Peplinski JD, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17:129–150

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sun SH, Yu TT, Nguyen TT, Atroshchenko E, Bui TQ (2018) Structural shape optimization by IGABEM and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Eng Anal Bound Elem 88:26–40

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Topping BHV, Sziveri J, Bahreininejad A, Leite JPB, Cheng B (1998) Parallel processing, neural networks and genetic algorithms. Adv Eng Softw 29(10):763–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Yu TT, Shao G, Nguyen TT, Bui TQ (2019a) Shape optimization of structures with cutouts by an efficient approach based on XIGA and chaotic particle swarm optimization. Eur J Mech A Solids 74:176–187

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Yu TT, Curiel-Sosa JL, Xie N, Bui TQ (2019b) Adaptive chaotic particle swarm algorithm for isogeometric multi-objective size optimization of FG plates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60:757–778

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu T, Zuo W, Xu T, Song G, Li R (2010) An adaptive reanalysis method for genetic algorithm with application to fast truss optimization. Acta Mech Sinica 26:225–234

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zawidzki M (2017) Discrete optimization in architecture: Extremely modular systems, Springer briefs in architectural design and technology. Springer, Singapore

  • Zawidzki M, Szklarski J (2018) Effective multi-objective discrete optimization of Truss-Z layouts using a GPU. Appl Soft Comput 70:501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W, Xu T, Zhang H, Xu T (2011) Fast structural optimization with frequency constraints by genetic algorithm using adaptive eigenvalue reanalysis methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Replication of results

Data for replication of the test examples will be made available upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey

    Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad

Authors
  1. Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Mehmet Polat Saka

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azad, S.K. Design optimization of real-size steel frames using monitored convergence curve. Struct Multidisc Optim 63, 267–288 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02692-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02692-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation