Abstract
Optimization for the car body under the condition of guaranteeing vehicle overall mechanical performance remains a key automotive engineering design challenge currently. The present study first attempts to group the car body components into safety components (SCs) and non-safety components (NSCs) based on their correlation with crashworthiness safety and then focuses on the potential of NSCs, which compromise a group of thin-walled plate parts that basically have little impact on overall vehicle crashworthiness, for multi-objective lightweight and stiffness optimization. To be more specific, the finite element (FE) models of significant vehicle performance, including the static-dynamic stiffness of the car body and the frontal and side crashworthiness of the vehicle, were first separately established and validated against experimental outcomes. On this basis, SCs closely related to vehicle crashworthiness safety, including frontal safety components (FSCs) and side safety components (SSCs), were figured out through crashworthiness analyses. As a result, the initial NSCs (INSCs) were also determined by filtering out all the SCs from the car body. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis (SA) was employed to screen the INSCs for the final NSCs (FNSCs) for multi-objective lightweight and stiffness optimization, considering minimizing the total mass while maximizing both the static global torsional stiffness and the dynamic first-order torsional frequency of the car body as three optimization objectives. Radial basis function (RBF), multi-objective particle swam optimization (MOPSO) algorithm and modified grey relational analysis (MGRA) were then separately utilized for constructing meta-models, solving optimization process, and identifying the best trade-off design. In addition, different optimization strategies were compared. According to the optimized outcomes, the car body is dramatically lightweight optimized by 7.92 kg; meanwhile, the static-dynamic stiffness of the car body is slightly improved and the overall vehicle crashworthiness is basically guaranteed. Hence, the proposed systematic approach gains insight on reasonable and efficient multi-objective optimization for the car body.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen T, Peng Y (2014) Side impact safety design of vehicle based on implicit parametric technology. 635-637. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.635-637.631
Chen W, Zuo W (2014) Component sensitivity analysis of conceptual vehicle body for lightweight design under static and dynamic stiffness demands. Int J Veh Des 66:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvd.2014.064546
Chen X, Ma F, Wang D, Xie C (2014) Carbody structural lightweighting based on implicit parameterized model. Chin J Mech Eng 27:483–487. https://doi.org/10.3901/cjme.2014.03.483
Chen Y, Liu G, Zhang Z, Hou S (2017) Integrated design technique for materials and structures of vehicle body under crash safety considerations. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56:455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1674-8
Cho JG, Koo JS, Jung HS (2016) A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 30:673–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0123-8
Duan L, Sun G, Cui J, Chen T, Cheng A, Li G (2016) Crashworthiness design of vehicle structure with tailor rolled blank. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53:321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1315-z
Duan L, Xiao N-C, Hu Z, Li G, Cheng A (2017) An efficient lightweight design strategy for body-in-white based on implicit parameterization technique. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:1927–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1621-0
Fang JG, Gao YK, Sun GY, Qiu N, Li Q (2015a) On design of multi-cell tubes under axial and oblique impact loads. Thin-Walled Struct 95:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.07.002
Fang JG, Gao YK, Sun GY, Zheng G, Li Q (2015b) Dynamic crashing behavior of new extrudable multi-cell tubes with a functionally graded thickness. Int J Mech Sci 103:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.08.029
Fang Y, Zhan Z, Yang J, Liu X (2017) A mixed-kernel-based support vector regression model for automotive body design optimization under uncertainty. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst B Mech Eng 3:041008
Gao X, Xu Y, Wang Q (2014) A study on the crashworthiness and lightweighting of B-pillar in a car based on bench test and simulation. Automot Eng 36:957–962,973
Gao Q, Wang L, Wang Y, Guo F, Zhang Z (2016) Optimization of foam-filled double ellipse tubes under multiple loading cases. Adv Eng Softw 99:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.05.001
Goede M, Stehlin M, Rafflenbeul L, Kopp G, Beeh E (2009) Super Light Car—lightweight construction thanks to a multi-material design and function integration. Eur Transp Res Rev 1:5–10
Hou SJ, Han X, Sun GY, Long SY, Li W, Yang XJ, Li Q (2011) Multiobjective optimization for tapered circular tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 49:855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.02.010
Ji F, Wang D, Chen S, Liu B, Li X (2014) Implicit parameterization modeling and multi-objective lightweight optimization for a car's body-in-white. Automot Eng 36:254–258
Jia SK, Qian X, Yuan XG (2017) Optimal design for dividing wall column using support vector machine and particle swarm optimization. Chem Eng Res Des 125:422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.07.028
Kumagai M, Otomori M, Ide T, Yamada T, Izui K, Nishiwaki S (2016) Design study of lightweight automatic transmission parts for vehicles using level set-based topology optimization. SAE technical papers. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1386
Li GY, Xu FX, Huang XD, Sun GY (2015) Topology optimization of an automotive tailor-welded blank door. J Mech Des:137. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028704
Qiu R, Chen Y, Lei F, Yang S, Li Y (2016) Lightweight of the vehicle B pillar based on six sigma robust design under side impact. Jixie Qiangdu/J Mech Strength 38:502–508. https://doi.org/10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2016.03.014
Tanlak N, Sonmez FO, Senaltun M (2015) Shape optimization of bumper beams under high-velocity impact loads. Eng Struct 95:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.046
Velea MN, Wennhage P, Zenkert D (2014) Multi-objective optimisation of vehicle bodies made of FRP sandwich structures. Compos Struct 111:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.030
Wang D-f, Wang C-q (2015) Lightweight optimization design of automotive aluminum alloy front bumper anti-collision beam. In: Yarlagadda P (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation, vol 15. ACSR-Advances in Comptuer Science Research. pp 1207–1211
Wang D, Jiang R, Wu Y (2016) A hybrid method of modified NSGA-II and TOPSIS for lightweight design of parameterized passenger car sub-frame. J Mech Sci Technol 30:4909–4917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1010-z
Wang D, Zhang S, Wang C, Zhang C (2017) Structure-material-performance integration lightweight optimisation design for frontal bumper system. Int J Crashworthiness:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2017.1317468
Xiong F, Wang D, Ma Z, Chen S, Lv T, Lu F (2018a) Structure-material integrated multi-objective lightweight design of the front end structure of automobile body. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:829–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1778-1
Xiong F, Wang D, Ma Z, Lv T, Ji L (2018b) Lightweight optimization of the front end structure of an automobile body using entropy-based grey relational analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng:0954407018755844
Xiong F, Wang D, Zhang S, Cai K, Wang S, Lu F (2018c) Lightweight optimization of the side structure of automobile body using combined grey relational and principal component analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1749-6
Xu F, Sun G, Li G, Li Q (2013) Crashworthiness design of multi-component tailor-welded blank (TWB) structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:653–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0916-7
Ye S, Xin Y (2013) Research on the lightweight of vehicle door based on sensitivity and size optimization. Mach Des Res 29:112–115,121
Yin H, Wen G, Fang H, Qing Q, Kong X, Xiao J, Liu Z (2014) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization design of functionally graded foam-filled tapered tube based on dynamic ensemble metamodel. Mater Des 55:747–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.054
Zhang Y, Sun G, Xu X, Li G, Li Q (2014) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of hollow and conical tubes for multiple load cases. Thin-Walled Struct 82:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.05.006
Zhu P, Zhang Y, Chen GL (2009) Metamodel-based lightweight design of an automotive front-body structure using robust optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng 223:1133–1147. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070jauto1045
Zuo W, Yu J, Saitou K (2016) Stress sensitivity analysis and optimization of automobile body frame consisting of rectangular tubes. Int J Automot Technol 17:843–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-016-0082-1
Acknowledgments
This research work is supported by the Youth Project of Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Education Commission of China (No. KJQN201901105), Research Initiation Fund of Chongqing University of Technology (No. 2019ZD79), and Research Support Project of College of Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology (No. CL2019-14). The authors would like to express their appreciation for the above fund supports.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
Replication of results
Additional data and computer codes cannot be shared due to commercial or technical secrets considerations.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ren-Jye Yang
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiong, F., Zou, X., Zhang, Z. et al. A systematic approach for multi-objective lightweight and stiffness optimization of a car body. Struct Multidisc Optim 62, 3229–3248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02674-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02674-5