Abstract
In the design of discrete structures such as trusses and frames, important quantitative goals such as minimal weight or minimal compliance often dominate. Many numerical techniques exist to address these needs. However, an analytical approach exists to meet similar goals, which was initiated by Michell (1904) and has been mostly used for two-dimensional structures so far. This paper develops a method to extend the existing mainly two-dimensional approach to apply to three-dimensional structures. It will be referred as the Michell strain tensor method (MSTM). First, the proof that MSTM is consistent with the existing theory in two dimensions is provided. Second, two- and three-dimensional known solutions will be replicated based on MSTM. Finally, MSTM will be used to solve new three-dimensional cases.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig11_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig12_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig13_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig14_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig15_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig16_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-016-1622-z/MediaObjects/158_2016_1622_Fig17_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This definition relates to truss-like structures. As recently shown in Sigmund et al. (2016), other kind of structures, such as plate- or shell-like structures with varying thicknesses, may be more optimal in terms of stiffness or compliance than their truss-like counterparts.
References
Chan ASL (1960) The design of Michell optimum structures. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda 3303
Ghista DN, Resnikoff MM (1968) Development of Michell minimum weight structures. NASA Technical Notes D-4345
Hemp WS (1973) Optimum structures, Oxford university press, chap 4, pp 70–101. Oxford Engineering Science Series
Lewińsky T (2004) Michell structures formed on surfaces of revolution. Struct Multidiscip Optim 28:20–30. doi:10.1007/s00158-004-0419-7
Lewińsky T, Sokół T (2014) On basic properties of Michell’s structures. Topol Optim Struct Continuum Mech 549:87–128. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1643-2_6
Love AEH (1906) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press
Michell AGM (1904) The limit of economy of material in frame structures. PhilMag Series VI 8
Rozvany GIN (1996) Some shortcomings in Michell’s truss theory. Structural Optimization 12:244–250. doi:10.1007/BF01197364
Rozvany GIN (2014) Structural topology optimization (sto) - exact analytical solutions: part i. Topol Optim Struct Continuum Mech 549:1–14. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1643-2_1
Sadd MH (2005) Elasticity: theory, applications and numerics. Elsevier
Sigmund O, Aage N, Andreassen E (2016) On the (non-)optimality of Michell structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-016-1420-7
Sokół T, Rozvany GIN (2012) New analytical benchmarks for topology optimization and their implications. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46:477–486. doi:10.1007/s00158-012-0786-4
Spillers WR (1975) Iterative Structural Design. Elsevier
Strang G, Kohn R (1983) Hencky-Prandtl nets and constrained Michell trusses. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 36:207–222. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(83)90113-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacot, B.P., Mueller, C.T. A strain tensor method for three-dimensional Michell structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 55, 1819–1829 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1622-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1622-z