Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stochastic optimization of nonlinear energy sinks

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlinear energy sinks (NES) are a promising technique to achieve vibration mitigation. Through nonlinear stiffness properties, NES are able to passively and irreversibly absorb energy. Unlike the traditional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD), NES absorb energy from a wide range of frequencies. Many studies have focused on NES behavior and dynamics, but few have addressed the optimal design of NES. Design considerations of NES are of prime importance as it has been shown that NES dynamics exhibit an acute sensitivity to uncertainties. In fact, the sensitivity is so marked that NES efficiency is near-discontinuous and can switch from a high to a low value for a small perturbation in design parameters or loading conditions. This article presents an approach for the probabilistic design of NES which accounts for random design and aleatory variables as well as response discontinuities. In order to maximize the mean efficiency, the algorithm is based on the identification of regions of the design and aleatory space corresponding to markedly different NES efficiencies. This is done through a sequence of approximated sub-problems constructed from clustering, Kriging approximations, a support vector machine, and Monte-Carlo simulations. The refinement of the surrogates is performed locally using a generalized max-min sampling scheme which accounts for the distributions of random variables. The sampling scheme also makes use of the predicted variance of the Kriging surrogates for the selection of aleatory variables values. The proposed algorithm is applied to three example problems of varying dimensionality, all including an aleatory excitation applied to the main system. The stochastic optima are compared to NES optimized deterministically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basudhar A, Missoum S (2010) An improved adaptive sampling scheme for the construction of explicit boundaries. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(4):517–529. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0511-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellet R, Cochelin B, Herzog P, Mattei P O (2010) Experimental study of targeted energy transfer from an acoustic system to a nonlinear membrane absorber. J Sound Vibr 329(14):2768–2791. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellet R, Cochelin B, Côte R, Mattei P O (2012) Enhancing the dynamic range of targeted energy transfer in acoustics using several nonlinear membrane absorbers. J Sound Vibr 331(26):5657–5668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichon B, Mahadevan S, Eldred M (2009) Reliability-based design optimization using efficient global reliability analysis. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Palm Springs. doi:10.2514/6.2009-2261

  • Bichon B J, Eldred M S, Swiler L P, Mahadevan S, McFarland J M (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468. doi:10.2514/1.34321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boroson E, Missoum S (2015) Reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear energy sinks. In: 11th World congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Sydney, pp 750–757

  • Boroson E, Missoum S, Mattei P O, Vergez C (2014) Optimization under uncertainty of nonlinear energy sinks. In: ASME 2014 International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  • Gendelman O, Manevitch L, Vakakis A F, M’closkey R (2001) Energy pumping in nonlinear mechanical oscillators: Part i: Dynamics of the underlying hamiltonian systems. J Appl Mech 68(1):34–41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gourdon E, Lamarque C H (2006) Nonlinear energy sink with uncertain parameters. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 1(3):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourdon E, Lamarque C H, Pernot S (2007) Contribution to efficiency of irreversible passive energy pumping with a strong nonlinear attachment. Nonlin Dyn 50(4):793–808. doi:10.1007/s11071-007-9229-y

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan J A, Wong M A (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat 28(1):100–108. doi:10.2307/2346830

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard S A, McFarland D M, Bergman L A, Vakakis A F (2010) Targeted energy transfer between a model flexible wing and nonlinear energy sink. J Aircraft 47(6):1918–1931. doi:10.2514/1.C001012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Mcfarland M D, Bergman L A, Vakakis A F (2003) Steady state passive nonlinear energy pumping in coupled oscillators: theoretical and experimental results. Nonlin Dyn 33(1):87–102. doi:10.1023/A:1025599211712

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Schonlau M, Welch W (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Global Optim 13(4):455–492

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lacaze S, Missoum S (2013) A generalized max-min sample for surrogate update. J Struct Multidiscipl Optim 49(4):683–687. doi:10.1007/s00158-013-1011-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacaze S, Brevault L, Missoum S, Balesdent M (2015) Probability of failure sensitivity with respect to decision variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-015-1232-1

  • Lee Y S, Vakakis A F, Bergman L A, McFarland D M (2006) Suppression of limit cycle oscillations in the Van der Pol oscillator by means of passive non-linear energy sinks. Struct Control Health Monitor 13(1):41–75. doi:10.1002/stc.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y S, Vakakis A F, Bergman L A, McFarland D M, Kerschen G (2008) Enhancing the robustness of aeroelastic instability suppression using multi-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy sinks. AIAA J 46(6):1371–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen T A, Pernot S (2012) Design criteria for optimally tuned nonlinear energy sinks part 1: transient regime. Nonlinear Dyn 69(1-2):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starosvetsky Y, Gendelman O V (2008) Attractors of harmonically forced linear oscillator with attached nonlinear energy sink. II: optimization of a nonlinear vibration absorber. Nonlin Dyn 51(1-2):47–57. doi:10.1007/s11071-006-9168-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vakakis A, Gendelman O, Bergman L (2009) Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in discrete linear oscillators with single-DOF nonlinear energy sinks. In: Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in mechanical and structural systems. Springer Science & Business Media, chap Nonlinear, pp 93–302

  • Vakakis A F (2001) Inducing passive nonlinear energy sinks in vibrating systems. J Vibr Acoust 123(3):324. doi:10.1115/1.1368883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakakis A F, Kounadis A N, Raftoyiannis I G (1999) Use of non-linear localization for isolating structures from earthquake-induced motions. Earthquake Eng Structl Dyn 28(1):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakakis A F, Manevitch L I, Gendelman O, Bergman L (2003) Dynamics of linear discrete systems connected to local, essentially non-linear attachments. J Sound Vibr 264(3):559–577. doi:10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01207-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierschem N, Spencer B, Bergman L, Vakakis A (2011) Numerical study of nonlinear energy sinks for seismic response reduction. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on advanced smart materials and smart structures technology (ANCRiSST 2011), pp 25–26

  • Wierschem N E, Luo J, AL-Shudeifat M, Hubbard S, Ott R, La Fahnestock, Quinn D D, McFarland D M, Spencer B F, Vakakis A, La Bergman (2014) Experimental testing and numerical simulation of a six-story structure incorporating two-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy sink. J Struct Eng 140(6):04014,027. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000978

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samy Missoum.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Clustering

It is well known that clustering can be a tedious process since finding “optimal” clusters is dependent on the criterion used. Although clustering would seem to be straightforward in the case of two clusters due to discontinuities, the NES case presents difficulties when clustering is left fully unsupervised. For example, in some cases, the K-means algorithm (Hartigan and Wong 1979) can generate non-meaningful clusters. Figure 16 provides such an example of poor clustering for \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) as a function of the cubic stiffness α. The figure clearly shows that a plateau of low efficiency points are classified as efficient by the clustering algorithm.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Clustering result from K-means algorithm with 2 clusters applied to \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) values

However, this difficulty can be overcome by injecting some a priori knowledge from the physics of NES. Indeed, some NES configurations can be automatically classified as inefficient, thus leading to a much clearer discontinuity. The discarded configurations are those with an \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) lower than that obtained when the cubic stiffness is minimal. K-means is then applied to the remaining subset of samples. The lower efficiency points as designated by K-means are combined with the previously discarded points to form one cluster, while the remaining points with higher \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) values make up the other cluster. This procedure is illustrated in Figs. 16 and 17. Note that clustering is performed based only on the energy dissipated, so the rightmost green triangular points are classified as inefficient. In higher dimensions, the \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) for the minimum α is still used while the other variables are set to their means.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Clustering result from clustering scheme applied to \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) values. First points below threshold (red) are removed, then K-means algorithm with 2 clusters is applied to remaining points

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boroson, E., Missoum, S. Stochastic optimization of nonlinear energy sinks. Struct Multidisc Optim 55, 633–646 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1526-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1526-y

Keywords

Navigation