Abstract
Nonlinear energy sinks (NES) are a promising technique to achieve vibration mitigation. Through nonlinear stiffness properties, NES are able to passively and irreversibly absorb energy. Unlike the traditional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD), NES absorb energy from a wide range of frequencies. Many studies have focused on NES behavior and dynamics, but few have addressed the optimal design of NES. Design considerations of NES are of prime importance as it has been shown that NES dynamics exhibit an acute sensitivity to uncertainties. In fact, the sensitivity is so marked that NES efficiency is near-discontinuous and can switch from a high to a low value for a small perturbation in design parameters or loading conditions. This article presents an approach for the probabilistic design of NES which accounts for random design and aleatory variables as well as response discontinuities. In order to maximize the mean efficiency, the algorithm is based on the identification of regions of the design and aleatory space corresponding to markedly different NES efficiencies. This is done through a sequence of approximated sub-problems constructed from clustering, Kriging approximations, a support vector machine, and Monte-Carlo simulations. The refinement of the surrogates is performed locally using a generalized max-min sampling scheme which accounts for the distributions of random variables. The sampling scheme also makes use of the predicted variance of the Kriging surrogates for the selection of aleatory variables values. The proposed algorithm is applied to three example problems of varying dimensionality, all including an aleatory excitation applied to the main system. The stochastic optima are compared to NES optimized deterministically.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basudhar A, Missoum S (2010) An improved adaptive sampling scheme for the construction of explicit boundaries. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(4):517–529. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0511-0
Bellet R, Cochelin B, Herzog P, Mattei P O (2010) Experimental study of targeted energy transfer from an acoustic system to a nonlinear membrane absorber. J Sound Vibr 329(14):2768–2791. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.029
Bellet R, Cochelin B, Côte R, Mattei P O (2012) Enhancing the dynamic range of targeted energy transfer in acoustics using several nonlinear membrane absorbers. J Sound Vibr 331(26):5657–5668
Bichon B, Mahadevan S, Eldred M (2009) Reliability-based design optimization using efficient global reliability analysis. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Palm Springs. doi:10.2514/6.2009-2261
Bichon B J, Eldred M S, Swiler L P, Mahadevan S, McFarland J M (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468. doi:10.2514/1.34321
Boroson E, Missoum S (2015) Reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear energy sinks. In: 11th World congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Sydney, pp 750–757
Boroson E, Missoum S, Mattei P O, Vergez C (2014) Optimization under uncertainty of nonlinear energy sinks. In: ASME 2014 International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Gendelman O, Manevitch L, Vakakis A F, M’closkey R (2001) Energy pumping in nonlinear mechanical oscillators: Part i: Dynamics of the underlying hamiltonian systems. J Appl Mech 68(1):34–41
Gourdon E, Lamarque C H (2006) Nonlinear energy sink with uncertain parameters. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 1(3):187–195
Gourdon E, Lamarque C H, Pernot S (2007) Contribution to efficiency of irreversible passive energy pumping with a strong nonlinear attachment. Nonlin Dyn 50(4):793–808. doi:10.1007/s11071-007-9229-y
Hartigan J A, Wong M A (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat 28(1):100–108. doi:10.2307/2346830
Hubbard S A, McFarland D M, Bergman L A, Vakakis A F (2010) Targeted energy transfer between a model flexible wing and nonlinear energy sink. J Aircraft 47(6):1918–1931. doi:10.2514/1.C001012
Jiang X, Mcfarland M D, Bergman L A, Vakakis A F (2003) Steady state passive nonlinear energy pumping in coupled oscillators: theoretical and experimental results. Nonlin Dyn 33(1):87–102. doi:10.1023/A:1025599211712
Jones D, Schonlau M, Welch W (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Global Optim 13(4):455–492
Lacaze S, Missoum S (2013) A generalized max-min sample for surrogate update. J Struct Multidiscipl Optim 49(4):683–687. doi:10.1007/s00158-013-1011-9
Lacaze S, Brevault L, Missoum S, Balesdent M (2015) Probability of failure sensitivity with respect to decision variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-015-1232-1
Lee Y S, Vakakis A F, Bergman L A, McFarland D M (2006) Suppression of limit cycle oscillations in the Van der Pol oscillator by means of passive non-linear energy sinks. Struct Control Health Monitor 13(1):41–75. doi:10.1002/stc.143
Lee Y S, Vakakis A F, Bergman L A, McFarland D M, Kerschen G (2008) Enhancing the robustness of aeroelastic instability suppression using multi-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy sinks. AIAA J 46(6):1371–1394
Nguyen T A, Pernot S (2012) Design criteria for optimally tuned nonlinear energy sinks part 1: transient regime. Nonlinear Dyn 69(1-2):1–19
Starosvetsky Y, Gendelman O V (2008) Attractors of harmonically forced linear oscillator with attached nonlinear energy sink. II: optimization of a nonlinear vibration absorber. Nonlin Dyn 51(1-2):47–57. doi:10.1007/s11071-006-9168-z
Vakakis A, Gendelman O, Bergman L (2009) Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in discrete linear oscillators with single-DOF nonlinear energy sinks. In: Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in mechanical and structural systems. Springer Science & Business Media, chap Nonlinear, pp 93–302
Vakakis A F (2001) Inducing passive nonlinear energy sinks in vibrating systems. J Vibr Acoust 123(3):324. doi:10.1115/1.1368883
Vakakis A F, Kounadis A N, Raftoyiannis I G (1999) Use of non-linear localization for isolating structures from earthquake-induced motions. Earthquake Eng Structl Dyn 28(1):21–36
Vakakis A F, Manevitch L I, Gendelman O, Bergman L (2003) Dynamics of linear discrete systems connected to local, essentially non-linear attachments. J Sound Vibr 264(3):559–577. doi:10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01207-5
Wierschem N, Spencer B, Bergman L, Vakakis A (2011) Numerical study of nonlinear energy sinks for seismic response reduction. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on advanced smart materials and smart structures technology (ANCRiSST 2011), pp 25–26
Wierschem N E, Luo J, AL-Shudeifat M, Hubbard S, Ott R, La Fahnestock, Quinn D D, McFarland D M, Spencer B F, Vakakis A, La Bergman (2014) Experimental testing and numerical simulation of a six-story structure incorporating two-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy sink. J Struct Eng 140(6):04014,027. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000978
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Clustering
It is well known that clustering can be a tedious process since finding “optimal” clusters is dependent on the criterion used. Although clustering would seem to be straightforward in the case of two clusters due to discontinuities, the NES case presents difficulties when clustering is left fully unsupervised. For example, in some cases, the K-means algorithm (Hartigan and Wong 1979) can generate non-meaningful clusters. Figure 16 provides such an example of poor clustering for \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) as a function of the cubic stiffness α. The figure clearly shows that a plateau of low efficiency points are classified as efficient by the clustering algorithm.
However, this difficulty can be overcome by injecting some a priori knowledge from the physics of NES. Indeed, some NES configurations can be automatically classified as inefficient, thus leading to a much clearer discontinuity. The discarded configurations are those with an \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) lower than that obtained when the cubic stiffness is minimal. K-means is then applied to the remaining subset of samples. The lower efficiency points as designated by K-means are combined with the previously discarded points to form one cluster, while the remaining points with higher \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) values make up the other cluster. This procedure is illustrated in Figs. 16 and 17. Note that clustering is performed based only on the energy dissipated, so the rightmost green triangular points are classified as inefficient. In higher dimensions, the \(E_{NES_{inf}}\) for the minimum α is still used while the other variables are set to their means.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boroson, E., Missoum, S. Stochastic optimization of nonlinear energy sinks. Struct Multidisc Optim 55, 633–646 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1526-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1526-y