Skip to main content
Log in

Compliant mechanism design using multi-objective topology optimization scheme of continuum structures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topology optimization problems for compliant mechanisms using a density interpolation scheme, the rational approximation of material properties (RAMP) method, and a globally convergent version of the method of moving asymptotes (GCMMA) are primarily discussed. First, a new multi-objective formulation is proposed for topology optimization of compliant mechanisms, in which the maximization of mutual energy (flexibility) and the minimization of mean compliance (stiffness) are considered simultaneously. The formulation of one-node connected hinges, as well as checkerboards and mesh-dependency, is typically encountered in the design of compliant mechanisms. A new hybrid-filtering scheme is proposed to solve numerical instabilities, which can not only eliminate checkerboards and mesh-dependency efficiently, but also prevent one-node connected hinges from occurring in the resulting mechanisms to some extent. Several numerical applications are performed to demonstrate the validity of the methods presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ananthasuresh GK, Kota S, Gianchandani Y (1994) A methodical approach to the design of compliant micro-mechanisms. In: Technical Digest of the Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, SC, June 13–16, 189–192

  2. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topology in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69:635–654

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  5. Borrvall T, Petersson J (2001) Topology optimization using regularized intermediate density control. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:4911–4928

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2143–2158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz AR, Sigmund O (1995) Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization. Struct Optim 10:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duysinx P, Bendsøe O (1998) Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(1):1453–1478

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frecker MI, Ananthasuresh GK, Nishiwaki S Kikuchi N, Kota S (1997) Topological synthesis of compliant micromechnisms using multi-criteria optimization. J Mech Des 119:238–245

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haber RB, Bendsoe MP, Jog C (1996) A new approach to variable-topology shape design using a constraint on the perimeter. Struct Optim 11:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howell LL (2001) Compliant mechanisms. Wiley, New York

  12. Howell LL, Midha A (1994) A method for design of compliant mechanisms with small length flexural pivots. Trans ASME 116:280–290

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen U, Sibmund O, Bouuwstra S (1997) Design and fabrication of compliant micro-mechanisms and structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Microelectromech Syst 6:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Midha A, Norton TW, Howell LL (1992) On the nomenclature and classification of compliant mechanisms: the components of mechanisms, Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., Arizona, 47:13–16

  15. Nishiwaki S, Frecker MI, Min S, Kikichi N (1998) Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using the homogenization method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42:535–559

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rozvany GIN (1997) Topology optimization in structural mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  17. Rozvany GIN (2001) Aims, Scope, history and unified terminology of computer-aided topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 21:90–108

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rozvany GIN, Kirsch U, Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1995) layout optimization of structures. Appl Mech Rev 48:41–119

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pedersen CBW, Buhl T, Sigmund O (2001) Topology synthesis of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2683–2705

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petersson J, Sigmund O (1998) Slope constrained topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 41:1417–1434

    Google Scholar 

  21. Poulsen TA (2002a) A new scheme for imposing a minimum length scale in topology optimization: the mole method. DCAMM report 663

  22. Poulsen TA (2002b) A simple scheme to prevent checkerboard patterns and one-node connected hinges in topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 24:396–399

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sigmund O (1994) Design of numerical structures using topology optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark

  24. Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach 25(3):493–524

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sigmund O (2001) Design of multiphysics actuator using topology optimization—part I: one material structure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(49–50):6577–6604

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sigmund O (2001) Design of multiphysics actuator using topology optimization—part II: two material structure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(49–50), 6605–6627

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 22:116–124

    Google Scholar 

  29. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes: a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373

    Google Scholar 

  30. Svanberg K (2002) A class of globally convergent optimization methods based on conservative convex separable approximations, SIAM J Optim 12:555-573

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometry and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89:197–224

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yin L, Ananthasuresh GK (2003) Design of distributed compliant mechanism. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 31(1):269–279

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yoon GH, Kim YY, Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2004) Hinge-free topology optimization with embedded translation-invariant differentiable wavelet shrinkage. Struct Multidisc Optim 27(2):139–150

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, Z., Chen, L., Yang, J. et al. Compliant mechanism design using multi-objective topology optimization scheme of continuum structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 30, 142–154 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0512-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0512-y

Keywords

Navigation