Skip to main content
Log in

Age-based health insurance coverage policies and mental health

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More than \(18\%\) of US adults meet the diagnostic criteria for a mental illness. Yet, many who could benefit from mental health care do not receive any treatment, primarily due to inability to pay for care or lack of health insurance coverage. How does a change in health insurance coverage affect psychological well-being and mental health? We explore this question using age-based health insurance coverage policies in the United States as natural experiments. We provide evidence that losing health insurance coverage at the age 26 due to aging out from dependent coverage is associated with a statistically significant deterioration in certain mental health indicators and psychological well-being among young adults. On the other hand, we find no evidence of an improvement in mental health or psychological well-being among the elderly at the age 65 due to becoming eligible for Medicare. These results are robust to potential changes in risk-taking behavior and physical health at the same age cutoffs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in this paper is the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and publicly available through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Notes

  1. Source: Open Minds U.S. Mental Health Market Report (2020).

  2. Before the implementation of the ACA, most insurance companies allowed dependent coverage until the dependent child turns 19. The effects of this age cutoff were also studied in the literature (Yörük 2016)

  3. We also exclude the month that each respondent turns 26 or 65 from the sample (when the forcing variable, i.e., the number of months before or after the 26th or 65th birth months, is equal to 0). This is because the MEPS reports only the month and year (but not day) of birth for each respondent. It is not possible to match the interview dates (that contain day, month, and year) with the exact 26th or 65th birthdate of each respondent. Therefore, it is not possible to pinpoint the treatment status of a respondent for the month that he or she turns 26 or 65.

  4. A person was considered eligible to receive the SAQ if that person did not have a status of deceased or institutionalized, was not a non-response at the time of the Round 2 or Round 4 interview date, did not move out of the US or to a military facility, and was 18 years of age or older.

  5. Imbens and Lemieux (2008); Porter (2003); Lee and Lemieux (2010) provide a discussion of the RD design and related issues.

  6. We use two different sample weights. For health insurance coverage and self-reported mental health outcomes, we use the sample weights as reported in the HC of the MEPS. For the remaining mental health and psychological well-being outcomes, we use the sample weights as reported in the SAQ of the MEPS.

  7. We estimate an alternative donut RD model for which we excluded the observations for six months before the 26th birthday. The results for the alternative model are similar to those from the donut RD model reported in Table 4 and available upon request.

  8. Yörük (2023) finds that young adults become more likely to report that health insurance is not worth the money it costs when they turn 26. We believe that this potential change in attitudes would not have a significant impact on mental health outcomes among young adults. We also expect that the potential effects of attitude changes (if any) would reduce the potential effects of health insurance loss on mental health. This is because people who believe that health insurance is not necessary are probably less likely to be stressed for the possibility of future health issues that may require costly treatments. In this case, our estimates will underestimate the true effect of the policy on mental health rather than overestimate it.

  9. See, for example, Gross (2010), Long et al. (1998), and Chatterji et al. (2021).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barış K. Yörük.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Xi Chen.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (pdf 1802 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yörük, B.K., Han, Y. Age-based health insurance coverage policies and mental health. J Popul Econ 37, 42 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-024-01015-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-024-01015-w

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation