Alissandrakis A, Syrdal’r DS, Miyake Y (2011) Helping robots imitate acknowledgmentof, and adaptation to, the robot’s feedback to a human task demonstration. New Front Hum Robot Interact 2:9–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.2.03ali
Article
Google Scholar
Argall BD, Chernova S, Veloso M, Browning B (2009) A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot Auton Syst 57(5):469–483
Article
Google Scholar
Azenkot S, Feng C, Cakmak M (2016) Enabling building service robots to guide blind people a participatory design approach. In 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 3–10
Bajones M, Huber A, Weiss A, Vincze M 2014 Towards more flexible hri: How to adapt to the user? In workshop on cognitive architectures for human-robot interaction at 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Citeseer
Bajones M, Fischinger D, Weiss A, Wolf D, Vincze M, de la Puente P, Körtner T, Weninger M, Papoutsakis K, Michel D et al (2018) Hobbit: providing fall detection and prevention for the elderly in the real world. J Robot. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1754657
Article
Google Scholar
Bajones M, Fischinger D, Weiss A, Puente PD, Wolf D, Vincze M, Körtner T, Weninger M, Papoutsakis K, Michel D, Qammaz A, Panteleris P, Foukarakis M, Adami I, Ioannidi D, Leonidis A, Antona M, Argyros A, Mayer P, Panek P, Eftring H, Frennert S (2019) Results of field trials with a mobile service robot for older adults in 16 private households. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 9(2):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368554
Article
Google Scholar
Bannon LJ, Ehn P (2012) Design: design matters in participatory design. In: Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, pp 57–83
Google Scholar
Bartneck C, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura T (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI & Soc 21(1–2):217–230
Google Scholar
Bertel LB, Rasmussen DM, Christiansen E (2013) Robots for real: Developing a participatory design framework for implementing educational robots in real-world learning environments. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, pp 437–444
Bjögvinsson E, Ehn P, Hillgren PA (2012) Design things and design thinking: contemporary participatory design challenges. Des Issues 28(3):101–116
Article
Google Scholar
Bødker S, Ehn P, Kammersgaard J, Kyng M, Sundblad Y (1987) A Utopian Experience: On design of Powerful Computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. In: Bjerknes G, Ehn P, Kyng M (eds) Computers and democracy: a Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, pp 251–278
Google Scholar
Bratteteig T, Verne G (2018) Does AI make PD obsolete?: exploring challenges from artificial intelligence to participatory design. In: proceedings of the 15th participatory design conference: short papers, situated actions, workshops and tutorial, vol 2. ACM, p 8
Bratteteig T, Wagner I (2012) Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. In: proceedings of the 12th participatory design conference: research papers, Vol 1, pp 41–50
Bruckenberger U, Weiss A, Mirnig N, Strasser E, Stadler S, Tscheligi M (2013) The good, the bad, the weird: audience evaluation of a “real” robot in relation to science fiction and mass media. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, pp 301–310
Buchner R, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2011) Development of a context model based on video analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, pp 117–118
Caleb-Solly, P, Dogramadzi S, Ellender D, Fear T, Heuvel HV (2015) A mixed-method approach to evoke creative and holistic thinking about robots in a home environment. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, pp 374–381
Carton D, Turnwald A, Wollherr D, Buss M (2013) Proactively approaching pedestrians with an autonomous mobile robot in urban environments. In: Experimental Robotics. Springer, pp 199–214.
Chang WL, Sabanovic S (2015) Interaction expands function: Social shaping of the therapeutic robot paro in a nursing home. In: 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), . IEEE, pp 343–350
Cheon E, Su NM (2016) Integrating roboticist values into a value sensitive design framework for humanoid robots. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp. 375–382
Chung MJY, Huang J, Takayama L, Lau T, Cakmak M (2016) Iterative design of a system for programming socially interactive service robots. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, pp 919–929
Dautenhahn K (2004) Robots we like to live with?!-a developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion. In: RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No. 04TH8759). IEEE, pp 17–22
Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Phil Trans R Soc B 362(1480):679–704
Article
Google Scholar
Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters ML, Koay KL, Werry I (2005) What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler? In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp. 1192–1197
De Graaf M, Allouch SB, Van Diik J (2017) Why do they refuse to use my robot?: Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. In: 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. HRI, pp 224–233
De Graaf M, Ben Allouch S, van Dijk J (2017) Why do they refuse to use my robot?: Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’17. ACM, New York, USA, pp 224–233. DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020236.
de la Puente P, Bajones M, Einramhof P, Wolf D, Fischinger D, Vincze M (2014) Rgbd sensor setup for multiple tasks of home robots and experimental results. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp 2587–2594
Druin, A (1999) Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’99, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, pp 592–599. DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303166
Feil-Seifer DJ, Matari MJ (2009) Human-robot interaction. pp. 4643–4659. Springer, New York. URL http://robotics.usc.edu/publications/585/
Fernaeus Y, Hakansson M, Jacobsson M, Ljungblad S (2010) How do you play with a robotic toy animal? a long-term study of pleo. In: Proceedings of the 9th international Conference on interaction Design and Children, pp 39–48
Fink J (2014) Dynamics of human-robot interaction in domestic environments. Tech rep, EPFL
Google Scholar
Fischer, K (2006) What computer talk is and isn’t. human-computer conversation as intercultural communication 17
Fischer G, Giaccardi E (2006) Meta-design: A framework for the future of end-user development. In: End user development. Springer, pp. 427–457
Fischinger D, Weiss A, Vincze M (2015) Learning grasps with topographic features. Int J Robot Res 34(9):1167–1194
Article
Google Scholar
Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K, Wohlkinger W, Mayer P, Panek P, Hofmann S, Koertner T, Weiss A, Argyros A et al (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Robot Auton Syst 75:60–78
Article
Google Scholar
Förster F, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2011) Anthropomorphic design for an interactive urban robot-the right design approach? In: 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 137–138
Frauenberger C, Makhaeva J, Spiel K (2017) Blending methods: developing participatory design sessions for autistic children. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’17. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, pp 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079727.
Frederiks AD, Octavia JR, Vandevelde C, Saldien J (2019) Towards participatory design of social robots. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, pp 527–535
Frennert S, Östlund B, Eftring H (2012) Would granny let an assistive robot into her home? In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, pp. 128–137
Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B (2013) Older people’s involvement in the development of a social assistive robot. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, pp. 8–18
Gonsior B, Landsiedel C, Glaser A, Wollherr D, Buss M (2011) Dialog strategies for handling miscommunication in task-related hri. In: 2011 RO-MAN. IEEE, pp. 369–375
Gonsior B, Sosnowski S, Mayer C, Blume J, Radig B, Wollherr D, Kühnlenz K (2011) Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions. In: 2011 RO-MAN. IEEE, pp 350–356
Gregory J (2003) Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. Int J Eng Educ 19(1):62–74
Google Scholar
Harrington C, Erete S, Piper AM (2019) Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proc. ACM Hum-Comput. Interact. 3(CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318
Holmquist LE (2017) Intelligence on tap: artificial intelligence as a new designmaterial. Interactions 24(4):28–33
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
Hornecker E, Bischof A, Graf P, Franzkowiak L, Krüger N (2020) The interactive enactment of care technologies and its implications for human-robot-interaction in care. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, NordiCHI ’20. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420103
Huber A, Lammer L, Weiss A, Vincze M (2014) Designing adaptive roles for socially assistive robots: a new method to reduce technological determinism and role stereotypes. J Hum Robot Interact 3(2):100–115
Article
Google Scholar
Karreman DE, van Dijk EM, Evers V (2012) Contextual analysis of human non-verbal guide behaviors to inform the development of frog, the fun robotic outdoor guide. In: International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding. Springer, pp 113–124
Körtner T. Schmid A, Batko-Klein D, Gisinger C, Huber A, Lammer L, Vincze M (2012) How social robots make older users really feel well–a method to assess users’ concepts of a social robotic assistant. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, pp 138–147
Kriz S, Ferro TD, Damera P, Porter JR (2010) Fictional robots as a data source in hri research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations. In: 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, pp 458–463
Lammer L, Huber A, Weiss A, Vincze M (2014) Mutual care: How older adults react when they should help their care robot. In: AISB2014: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction. Routledge London, UK, pp 1–4
Lammer L, Weiss A, Vincze M (2015) The 5-step plan: a holistic approach to investigate children’s ideas on future robotic products. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts. ACM, pp. 69–70
Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Rybski PE, Crabbe F, Chung W, Finkle J, Glaser E, Kiesler S (2009) The snackbot: documenting the design of a robot for long-term human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. ACM, pp 7–14
Lee MK, Kiesler S, Forlizzi J (2010) Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot? In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’10. ACM, New York, USA, pp 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718927
Lee HR, Sung J, Šabanović S, Han J (2012) Cultural design of domestic robots: a study of user expectations in Korea and the United States. In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, pp 803–808
Lee HR, Šabanović S, Chang WL, Nagata S, Piatt J, Bennett C, Hakken D (2017) Steps toward participatory design of social robots: mutual learning with older adults with depression. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction pp 244–253
Lichtenthäler C, Lorenz T, Karg M, Kirsch A (2012) Increasing perceived value between human and robots—measuring legibility in human aware navigation. In: 2012 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts (ARSO). IEEE, pp 89-94
Lorenčík D, Tarhaničová M, Sinčák P (2013) Influence of sci-fi films on artificial intelligence and vice-versa. In: 2013 IEEE 11th international symposium on applied machine intelligence and informatics (SAMI). IEEE, pp 27–31
McGinn C (2019) Why do robots need a head? the role of social interfaces on service robots. Int J Soc Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00564-5
Article
Google Scholar
Mirnig N, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2011) A communication structure for human-robot itinerary requests. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, pp 205–206
Mirnig N, Gonsior B, Sosnowski S, Landsiedel C, Wollherr D, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2012) Feedback guidelines for multimodal human-robot interaction: How should a robot give feedback when asking for directions? In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, pp 533–538
Mirnig N, Strasser E, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2012) Studies in public places as a means to positively influence people’s attitude towards robots. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, pp 209–218
Mubin O, Bartneck C (2015) Do as i say: Exploring human response to a predictable and unpredictable robot. In: Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, pp 110–116
Muller, M.J (2003) Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: J.A. Jacko, A. Sears (eds.) The Human-computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1051–1068. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772138
Niu S, McCrickard DS, Harrison S (2015) Exploring humanoid factors of robots through transparent and reflective interactions. In: 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). IEEE, pp. 47–54
Nourbakhsh IR (2013) Robot futures. Mit Press
Google Scholar
Payr S, Werner F, Werner K (2015) Potential of robotics for ambient assisted living. FFG benefit, Vienna
Google Scholar
Pripfl J, Körtner T, Batko-Klein D, Hebesberger D, Weninger M, Gisinger C, Frennert S, Eftring H, Antona M, Adami I, Weiss A (2016) Results of a real world trial with a mobile social service robot for older adults. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 497–498
Rantanen T, Lehto P, Vuorinen P, Coco K (2018) The adoption of care robots in home care-A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel. J Clin Nurs 27(9–10):1846–1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14355
Article
Google Scholar
Richardson K (2015) An anthropology of robots and AI: Annihilation anxiety and machines. Routledge
Book
Google Scholar
Riek LD (2012) Wizard of oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. JHRI 1(1):119–136
Article
Google Scholar
Riek LD (2014) The social co-robotics problem space: six key challenges. robotics challenges and vision (RCV2013)
Riek L, Howard D (2014) A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. Proceedings of We Robot
Rittel HW, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169
Article
Google Scholar
Rose EJ, Björling EA (2017) Designing for engagement: using participatory design to develop a social robot to measure teen stress. In: Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, pp 1–10
Šabanović S (2010) Robots in society, society in robots. Int J Soc Robotics 2(4):439–450
Article
Google Scholar
Saunders J, Syrdal DS, Koay KL, Burke N, Dautenhahn K (2015) “teach me–show me”—end-user personalization of a smart home and companion robot. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 46(1):27–40
Article
Google Scholar
Simonsen J, Robertson T (2012) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge
Book
Google Scholar
Sirkin D, Mok B, Yang S, Ju W (2015) Mechanical ottoman: how robotic furniture offers and withdraws support. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, pp 11–18
Spiel K, Malinverni L, Good J, Frauenberger C (2017) Participatory evaluation with autistic children. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17. Association for Computing Machinery. New York, USA, pp 5755–5766. DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025851
Stappers PJ (2007) Doing design as a part of doing research. Design research now, pp 81–91
Stollnberger G, Moser C, Giuliani M, Stadler S, Tscheligi M, Szczesniak-Stanczyk D, Stanczyk B (2016) User requirements for a medical robotic system: Enabling doctors to remotely conduct ultrasonography and physical examination. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 1156–1161
Sung J, Christensen HI, Grinter RE (2009) Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 45–52
Tapus A, Maja M, Scassellatti B (2007) The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):N-A
Tolmeijer S, Weiss A, Hanheide M, Lindner F, Powers TM, Dixon C, Tielman ML (2020) Taxonomy of trust-relevant failures and mitigation strategies. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 3–12
Triebel R, Arras K, Alami R, Beyer L, Breuers S, Chatila R, Chetouani M, Cremers D, Evers V, Fiore M, et al (2016) Spencer: a socially aware service robot for passenger guidance and help in busy airports. In: Field and service robotics. Springer, pp 607–622
Tsiourti C, Pillinger A, Weiss A (2020) Was vector a companion during shutdown? Insights from an ethnographic study in austria. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, HAI ’20 Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, p 269–271. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406499.3418767
Veselovská M, Mayerová K (2014) Pilot study: educational robotics at lower secondary school. In: Constructionism and Creativity Conference, Vienna
Vincze, M., Zagler, W., Lammer, L., Weiss, A., Huber, A., Fischinger, D., Koertner, T., Schmid, A., Gisinger, C (2014) Towards a robot for supporting older people to stay longer independent at home. In: ISR/Robotik 2014; 41st International Symposium on Robotics. VDE, pp 1–7
Vincze M, Bajones M, Suchi M, Wolf D, Lammer L, Weiss A, Fischinger D (2018) User experience results of setting free a service robot for older adults at home. Service Robots, InTech, p 23
Google Scholar
Von Hippel E (2009) Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Int J Innov Sci
Wang N, Pynadath DV, Hill SG (2016) Trust calibration within a human-robot team: comparing automatically generated explanations. In: the eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, pp 109–116
Weiss A, Igelsböck J, Calinon S, Billard A, Tscheligi M (2009) Teaching a humanoid: a user study on learning by demonstration with hoap-3. In: RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, pp 147–152
Weiss A, Mirnig N, Buchner R, Förster F, Tscheligi M (2011) Transferring human-human interaction studies to hri scenarios in public space. In: IFIP Conference on Human- Computer Interaction. Springer, pp 230–247
Weiss A, Mirnig N, Bruckenberger U, Strasser E, Tscheligi M, Kuhnlenz B, Wollherr D, Stanczyk B (2015) The interactive urban robot: user-centered development and final field trial of a direction requesting robot. Paladyn J Behav Robot. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2015-0005
Article
Google Scholar
Wollherr D, Khan S, Landsiedel C, Buss M (2016) The Interactive Urban Robot IURO: towards robot action in human environments. In: Ani Hsieh M, Khatib O, Kumar V (eds) Experimental robotics. Springer, pp 277–291
Chapter
Google Scholar
Złotowski J, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2011) Interaction scenarios for hri in public space. In: Bilge M, Christoph B, Jaap H, Vanessa E, Takayuki K (eds) International conference on social robotics. Springer, pp 1–10
Google Scholar