Abstract
Engagement is important to the success of applications, systems and artefacts as diverse as robotics, pedagogy, games, interactive installations, and virtual reality applications. Yet engagement has proved to be remarkably difficult to define as it can take many forms, so many that it is difficult to isolate what these different instantiations have in common. Instead of pursuing an empirical perspective, the human side of engagement, namely, involvement is considered from a broadly Heideggerian perspective. As Heidegger has a deserved reputation for philosophical obscurity, all of the concepts adopted from his work are mapped onto the more familiar languages and vocabularies of psychology, human–computer interaction and cognitive science. It is argued that technology is engaging and our response to it is to be involved (with it). This resulting involvement–engagement dyad is thus an explicitly holistic account recognising roles for affordance, purpose, identity, affect and embodiment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Dasein is traditonally left untranslated and is understood to mean “exist” and “there be”.
Availability is not the only way we experience technology. Technology can also be experienced as unavailable. Technology is experienced as being unavailable when it breaks down, for example, I experience the word processing software I am using to write this as available as I compose these words but occasionally the software misbehaves. The formatting of the text sometimes behaves in unexpected and undesirable ways. When this happens, the technology becomes “visible”, that is, the task of writing is relegated to the background and the misbehaving software occupies the foreground. After dealing with the formatting problem, the software disappears into the background and cease to be unavailable.
The third way in which we encounter technology is a little remote, Heidegger describes it as present-at-hand. We encounter technology (and so forth) as present-at-hand when we are engaged in “detached standing before” (Dreyfus 1991) or when we engage in theoretical reflection or during observation and experimentation.
References
Aho KA (2009) Heidegger's neglect of the body. SUNY Press, New York
Akah B, Bardzell S (2010) CHI EA '10 CHI '10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 4021–4026
Annett J (2004) Hierarchical task analysis. In: Diaper D, Stanton N (eds) The handbook of task analysis. Kluwer, London
Biocca F (2001) Inserting the presence of mind into a philosophy of presence: a response to Sheridan and Mantovani and Riva. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 10(5):546–556
Blevis E (2007) Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28–May 03, 2007). ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 503–512
Blom J, Monk A (2003) A theory of personalisation: why people personalise their PCs and mobile phones. Hum Comput Interact 18:193–228
Bødker S (1991) Through the interface—a human activity approach to user interface design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Boyle EA, Connolly TM, Hainey T, Boyle JM (2012) Engagement in digital entertainment games: a systematic review. Comput Hum Behav 28(3):771–780
Brockmyer JH, Fox CM, Curtiss KA, McBroom E, Burkhart KM, Pidruzny JN (2009) The development of the game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game-playing. J Exp Soc Psychol 45:624–634
Bryan-Kinn N (2010) Collective body engagement. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA). CHI ‘10. ACM Press, New York, NY
Buechley L, Eisenberg M, Catchen J, Crockett A (2008) The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In: CHI 2008 Proceedings—aesthetics, awareness, and sketching, pp 423–432
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) Psychol Hum Comput Interact. Hillsdale, New Jersey
Chemero A (2011) Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge
Coyne R (1995) Designing information technology in the postmodern age. MIT Press, Cambridge
Coyne R (1998) Cyberspace and Heidegger’s pragmatics. Inf Technol People 11(4):338–350
Coyne R (1999) Technoromanticism—digital narrative, holism, and the romance of the real. MIT Press, Cambridge
Coyne R (2003) Mindless repetition: learning from computer games. Des Stud 24:199–212
Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row, New York
Csikszentmihalyi M (1992) Flow: the psychology of happiness. Rider, London
Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam Press, New York
Dey A, Abowd G, Salber D (2001) A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction 16(2–4):97–166
Dickey MD (2005) Engaging by design: how engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Education Tech Research Dev 53(2):67–83
Dix A (2007) Designing for appropriation. Proc HCI 2007:27–30
Dourish P (2001) Where the action is. MIT Press, Cambridge
Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8:19–30
Downing G (2000) Emotion theory reconsidered. In: Wrathall M, Malpas J (eds) Heidegger, coping and cognitive science, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 245–269
Dreyfus HL (1991) Being-in-the-world: a commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division 1. MIT Press, Cambridge
Dreyfus HL, Wrathall MA (2005) Introduction. In: Dreyfus HL, Wrathall MA (eds) A companion to Heidegger. Blackwell Publishing, Malden
Dreyfus HL (1996) The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment. Electron J Anal Philos 4(Spring)
Dreyfus HL (2002) Intelligence without representation: Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:367–383
Edmonds E, Muller L, Connell M (2006) On creative engagement. Vis Commun 5(3):307–322
Engeström Y (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki
Febretti A, Garzotto F (2009) Usability, playability, and long-term engagement in computer games. In: Proceedings of 27th international conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 4063–4068
Galloway A, Brucker-Cohen J, Gaye L, Goodman E, Hill D (2004) Design for hackability. In: Proceedings of DIS’04. ACM Press, New York, pp 363–366
Gaver W, Boucher A, Pennington S, Walker B (2005) Evaluating technologies for ludic engagement. In: Proceedings of CHI’05. ACM Press, New York
Gaver WW, Bowers J, Boucher A, Gellerson H, Pennington S, Schmidt A, Steed A, Villars N, Walker B (2004) The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In: Proceedings of CHI’04, April 24–29, 2004, Vienna, Austria, pp 885–900
Gendlin ET (2006) Befindlichkeit: Heidegger and the philosophy of psychology. Rev Existent Psychol Psychiatr 16(3):1–27
Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Grudin J, Pruitt J (2002) Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. In: Proceedings of PDC’02, pp 144–161
Gunter GA, Kenny RF, Vick EH (2008) Engaging by design: how engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Education Tech Research Dev 53(2):67–83
Harman G (2002) Tool being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court, Chicago
Heidegger M (1927/1962) Being and time. (Trans: Macquarrie J, Robinson E) Harper Collins, New York.
Hook K, Sengers P, Andersson G (2003) Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art. In: Proceedings of CHI ‘03. ACM Press, New York
Hornecker E, Sifter M (2006) Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings. In: Proceedings of OzCHI 2006, pp 00–00
Hsu S-H, Chou C-Y, Chen F-C, Wang Y-K, Chan T-W (2007) An investigation of the differences between robot and virtual learning companions’ influences on students’ engagement. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international workshop on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning, pp 41–48
Hull R, Reid J (2003) Designing engaging experiences with children and artists. In: Blythe MA, Monk AF, Overbeeke K, Wright PC (eds) From Usability to Enjoyment, Funology, pp 179–187
Jaccucci (2010) Proceeding CHI '10 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 2267–2276
Kozima H, Michalowski MP, Nakagawa C (2009) Keepon—a playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. Int J SocRobotic 1:3–18
Lehmann J, Lalmas M, Yom-Tov E, Dupret G (2012) Models of user engagement. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization—UMAP’12, pp 16–20
Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001) A cross‐media presence questionnaire: the ITC‐sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 10:282–298
MacLean A, Carter K, Lövstrand L, Moran T (1990) User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. In: Proceedings of CHI ‘90. ACM Press, pp 175–182
Mayes DK, Cotton JE (2001) Measuring engagement in video games: a questionnaire. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 45th annual meeting, pp 692–696
McGonigal J (2011) Reality is broken. Jonathan Cape, UK
Merleau-Ponty M (1945/1962) Phenomenology of perception. (Trans: Smith C) Routledge Classics, London
Morrison AJ, Mitchell P, Brereton M (2007) The lens of ludic engagement: evaluating participation in interactive art installations. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, USA
Nelson H, Stolterman E (2003) The design way—intentional change in an unpredictable world. Educational technology Publications, New Jersey, p 269
Newman MW, Sedivy JZ, Neuwirth CM, Edwards WK, Hong JI, Izadi S, Marcelo K, Smith TF (2002) Designing for serendipity: supporting end-user configuration of ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proceedings of DIS ‘02, pp 147–156
O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2008) What is user engagement? a conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 59(6):938–955
Oatley K (1992) Best laid schemes: the psychology of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Oatley K, Johnson-Laird PN (1987) Towards a cognitive account of emotions. Cogn Emot 1:29–50
Ratcliffe M (2002) Heidegger’s attunement and the neuropsychology of emotion. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:287–312
Rich C, Ponsler B, Holroyd A, Sidner CL (2010) Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In: Proceeding of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 375–382
Rozendaal MC, Keyson DV, de Ridder H (2007) Product behaviour and appearance effects on experienced engagement during experiential and goal-directed tasks. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, Helsinki, Finland, pp 181–193
Salovaara A (2008) Inventing new uses for tools: a cognitive foundation for studies on appropriation. Hum Technol 4(2):209–228
Schachter S, Singer JE (2001) Cognitive, social and psychological determinants of emotional state. In: Parrott WG (ed) Emotions in social psychology. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 76–97
Schuurink EL, Houtkamp J, Toet A (2008) Engagement and EMG in serious gaming: experimenting with sound and dynamics in the levee patroller training game. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5294:139–149
Shapiro L (2011) Embodied cognition. Routledge, Oxford
Sheridan T (1992) Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 1(1):120–126
Shneiderman B (2004) Designing for fun: how can we design user interfaces to be more fun? Interaction, september + October, pp 48–50
Sidner CL, Lee C, Kidd C, Lesh N, Rich C (2005) Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artif Intell 166(1–2):104–164
Spinosa C, Flores F, Dreyfus H (2001) Disclosing new worlds. MIT Press, Cambridge
Sutcliffe A (2010) Designing for user engagement: aesthetic and attractive user interfaces. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA, USA
Szafir D, Mutlu B (2012) Proceeding CHI '12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp 11–20
Turkle S (2007) Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interact Stud 8(3):501–517
Turner P (2005) Affordance as context. Interact Comput 17(6):787–800
Turner P (2008) Towards an account of intuitiveness. Behav Inf Technol 27(6):1–8
Virvou M, Katsionis G, Manos K (2005) Combining software games with education: evaluation of its educational effectiveness. J Educ Technol Soc 8(2):54–65
Wajcman J (2009) Feminist theories of technology. Camb J Econ 34(1):143–152
White H, Steel E (2006) What’s the point: assessing emotional engagement with interactive jewellery using the POINT framework. In: Proceeding of the 5th international conference on design and emotion. Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
Winograd T (2006) Shifting viewpoints: artificial intelligence and human–computer interaction. Artif Intell 170:1256–1258
Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex, Norwood
Xenakis I, Arnellos A (2012) The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Des Stud. doi:10.1016/j
Online references
Microsoft Kinect (2010) http://www.xbox.com/en-US/kinect [last retrieved 25th October 2012]
Jones MG (1998) Creating electronic learning environments: Games, flow, and the user interface. In: Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the national convention of the association for educational communications and technology (AECT) pp 205–214. http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED423842 [last retrieved 4th November 2012]
Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence-Connect, (3)3. http://s3.amazonaws.com/publicationslist.org/data/melslater/ref-201/a%20note%20on%20presence%20terminology.pdf [last retrieved 25th October 2012]
Wheeler M (2011) “Martin Heidegger”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/heidegger [last retrieved 25th October 2012]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, P. The figure and ground of engagement. AI & Soc 29, 33–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0439-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0439-6