Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
The availability of intensive care unit (ICU) beds is crucial to the care of critical patients [1]. However, studies regarding the capacity of China's ICU resources are lacking [2]. To provide a first comprehensive overview of China's ICU bed capacity and distribution, we conducted an evaluation of the population-based trends in China's ICU bed supply over 15 years (between 2007 and 2021) based on the official published data, and used the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient to calculate the equity of China's ICU beds allocation in 2021, and compared the gap of ICU bed capacity between China and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Data source and analysis are presented in the electronic supplementary material.
Overall, ICU beds supply has largely increased in the last 15 years. From 2007 to 2021, the number of ICU beds increased from 7328 to 67,153 (the average annual percent change, AAPC = 17.56%); ICU beds per 100,000 population increased from 0.55 to 4.75 (AAPC = 16.96%); ICU beds as a proportion of hospital beds increased by 0.64 percent, from 0.27 to 0.91% (Fig. 1a–c, supplementary Table 1).
a The number of ICU beds; b ICU beds per 100,000 population; c ICU beds as a proportion of hospital beds; d the number of ICU beds per 100,000 population by province in china in 2021; e Lorenz curved and Gini coefficients for ICU beds in 2021 by population; f Lorenz curved and Gini coefficients for ICU beds in 2021 by geographical area. g Number of ICU beds per 100,000 population in 25 OECD countries in 2021; h ICU beds as a proportion of hospital beds in 25 OECD countries in 2021
At a regional level, only four provinces were identified as having more than 6 ICU beds per 100,000 population in 2021, namely Henan, Xinjiang, Zhejiang, and Beijing, with 8, 7.7, 6.8, and 6 respectively (Fig. 1d).
We identified obvious regional differences in China's ICU bed distribution. The Lorenz curve can visually judge the degree of inequality, and the Gini coefficient calculated based on the Lorenz curve is an ideal index to quantify the extent of inequality. The Lorenz curve of China's ICU beds in 2021 allocated by population was close to the absolute equity line, and the Gini coefficient was 0.142, indicating an absolutely fair state (Fig. 1e). However, the Lorenz curve by geographical area was far from the absolute equity line, and the Gini coefficient was 0.682, indicating the distribution was highly inequitable (Fig. 1f).
We collected hospital beds, and ICU beds from 25 OECD countries in 2021 from the OECD database. ICU beds per 100,000 population and ICU beds as a proportion of hospital beds in the 25 OECD countries were 25.84 and 5.28%, respectively, with 24 countries having a higher number of ICU beds per 100,000 population and a higher percentage of ICU beds proportion than China (Fig. 1g, h, supplementary Table 2).
In conclusion, our results suggest that despite the rapid increase in the number of China's ICU beds over the past 15 years, the proportion of ICU beds only reached 0.91% in 2021, far below the 2–8% criterion recommended by the Guidelines for the Construction and Management of Critical Care Medicine in China [2]; the number of beds per 100,000 population was still insufficient, with less than one-fifth of the average for OECD countries, and remained lower than average for low-income regions (6.44) and upper-middle-income regions (9.23) [3]. There were significant regional differences in the distribution of ICU beds in China. It is recommended to take measures to increase China's ICU capacity and improve the inequitable distribution between regions, to meet the greater demands for ICU admissions due to the pandemic outbreak and an aging population in the future [4, 5].
Availability of data and materials
The data collected and analyzed during the current study can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
13 March 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07376-w
References
Berger E, Winkelmann J, Eckhardt H et al (2022) A country-level analysis comparing hospital capacity and utilisation during the first COVID-19 wave across Europe. Health Policy 126:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.009
Du B, Xi X, Chen D et al (2010) Clinical review: critical care medicine in mainland China. Crit Care 14:206. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8222
Sen-Crowe B, Sutherland M, McKenney M et al (2021) A Closer look into global hospital beds capacity and resource shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Res 260:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.062
Flaatten H, de Lange DW, Artigas A et al (2017) The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU. Intens Care Med 43:1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4718-z
Arabi YM, Azoulay E, Al-Dorzi HM et al (2021) How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care. Intens Care Med 47:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06352-y
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the China Health Statistical Yearbooks, China Statistical Yearbooks, and OECD Database for the data provided for this study. In addition, we are grateful to Dan Yu, and Dong Wang of Xiangya Hospital for data interpretation and scientific support in the study.
Funding
This study was supported by China Medical Board (CMB) Open Competition Program (grant number: 20–367); Research Topics of the Professional Committee of Health Technology and Economic Evaluation of the Health Economics and Information Society of Hunan Province, China (grant number: 2022D10); the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number: 2023M733944).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZXQ and LY concepted and designed the study, had full access to all the data in this study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. LY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SYX contributed to the data analysis and revision of the manuscript. JMX assisted with literature search. JC participated in the acquisition of data and interpretation of the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable. No ethical approval was required because this study does not involve human participants and the study is a secondary analysis of existing data from public database or available information.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, L., Xu, S., Xu, J. et al. Variation in intensive care unit beds capacity in China from 2007 to 2021. Intensive Care Med 50, 472–474 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07347-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07347-1