Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Angiotensin II (ANGII) is a vasoconstrictive eighth amino acid peptide, which increases blood pressure within a complex regulatory and counterregulatory system (Fig. 1). ANGII is the key molecule in the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), which, together with catecholamines and vasopressin, maintains blood pressure and fluid homeostasis. These properties make angiotensin II a potential vasopressor drug for vasodilatory hypotension and/or shock in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, ANGII has not been commercially available until recently despite the fact that it had already been used safely in human studies for a long time [1]. In 2009, experimental work in Gram-negative septic sheep introduced the concept that septic acute kidney injury (AKI) may be partly due to efferent arteriolar vasodilatation and reported a marked beneficial effect of ANGII infusion on renal function [2]. This “rediscovery” of ANGII led to pilot work in humans [3] and then to the commercial development of an ANGII preparation (Giapreza®, La Jolla, San Diego, CA). This was followed by the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock III (ATHOS-3) trial [4, 5]. This international multicentre double-blind, randomized controlled trial (DB RCT) aimed to obtain Federal Drug Administration (FDA) (with a cautionary note that it might increase the risk of thrombotic events) approval by demonstrating that, in catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory shock receiving > 0.2 µg/kg/min of norepinephrine equivalent, the administration of ANGII would increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 3 h of infusion by either 10 mmHg or to ≥ 75 mmHg without any increase in background vasopressors. ATHOS-3 compared 163 ANGII-treated patients to 158 placebo-treated patients. Most had septic shock. The trial demonstrated an eightfold greater odds ratio of achieving MAP target with ANGII, with success in 70% vs 23% of cases with placebo. The drug is now FDA-approved as a second-line vasopressor for the treatment of catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory shock. In the United States of America (USA), it has been used in thousands of patients. It is now also approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the same indication. In late 2020, it was used to support the circulation among hypotensive patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [6] and has now also been used in cardiac surgery patients [7]. ANGII is now commercially available in Europe.
Post hoc subgroup analyses of the ATHOS-3 trial have provided additional data to show that patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) at randomization had better rates of recovery to RRT independence at day seven and improved survival with ANGII [8] and that patients with an ANGI/II ratio below the median were significantly more likely to survive than those with values above the median (suggesting a degree of ANGII deficiency) [9]. A further ATHOS-3 post hoc study found that patients with a plasma renin concentration (PRC) above the median who received ANGII were significantly more likely to have a decrease in PRC and increased survival rates [10]. Thus, among patients with vasodilatory shock, there was significant heterogeneity of RAAS endotype. On current evidence, therefore, it appears reasonable to use ANGII as rescue vasopressor in vasodilatory shock as approved by the FDA and EMA, especially in those patients with elevated PRC.
More data have recently accrued about ANGII. A further secondary analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial data has suggested that ANG II initiation at lower catecholamine and/or vasopressin levels may lead to better survival [11]. In addition, experimental data have demonstrated that ANGII is a powerful opsonin, which facilitates bacterial clearance [12].
The use of ANGII as primary vasopressor agent in cardiac surgery was recently compared to norepinephrine in a pilot DB RCT involving 60 patients. In this feasibility trial, compared with norepinephrine, ANGII started before surgery and targeting a MAP of > 70 mmHg proved equally safe and effective as vasopressor. It also decreased the duration of ICU stay and, unlike norepinephrine, did not show an increase in PRC, thus increasing the aldosterone:PRC ratio [13, 14]. Moreover, pre-operative exposure to RAAS inhibitors increased PRC and a higher PRC was associated with greater norepinephrine, but not greater ANGII, dose to achieve target MAP. In another pilot before-and-after study of critically ill vasopressor-dependent patients [15], ANGII appeared safe and effective, was associated with increased ICU survival, decreased troponin release and, in patients with pre-admission RAAS inhibitor exposure, a lower peak creatinine level to day seven. Prospective comparative controlled trials of ANGII, however, remain few and small so far and are summarized in supplemental Table 1.
In summary, current evidence supports the view that ANGII is a safe and physiologically effective vasopressor in catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory hypotension and/or shock. However, more studies are needed to better understand the timing, patient selection, and duration of ANGII therapy and its use in combination with other agents to deliver effective, safe, multifaceted, and balanced vasopressor therapy. In this regard, a RCT has just been completed which compared ANGII to norepinephrine in vasoplegic cardiac surgery patients with a postoperative PRC increase (NCT05199492). Moreover, another RCT comparing ANGII to norepinephrine as primary vasopressor in vasodilatory hypotension (ACTRN1262100104382) is currently recruiting. Finally, a third RCT comparing ANGII to norepinephrine in higher risk cardiac surgery (ACTRN12623000848606p) in due to start in early 2024.
Knowns and unknowns and future directions
We currently have limited evidence to select a specific population beyond refractory vasodilatory shock, where ANGII may be of greatest benefit. The use of renin to guide patient selection seems logical and is supported by retrospective data but needs to be confirmed prospectively. The preferential use of ANGII in vasodilatory shock patients with stage-3 AKI is similarly supported by retrospective data but needs to be confirmed by future AKI-focused RCTs. The safety and efficacy of ANGII as primary or secondary (instead of vasopressin) vasopressor in different types of vasoplegia is being investigated and needs to be tested in different contexts. Moreover, the interaction between recent exposure to RAAS inhibiting drugs and ANGII therapy appears important but needs to be clarified in larger prospective cohorts and trials. Finally, the clinical significance of the non-canonical ANGII counter-regulatory system (Fig. 1) in vasodilatory shock is essentially unexplored and requires dedicated studies with or without ANGII.
Data availability
All this data has been published and this article draws form that. We do nto hold any data in relation to this paper.
References
Busse LW, Wang XS, Chalikonda DM, Finkel KW, Khanna AK, Szerlip HM et al (2017) Clinical experience with angiotensin II administration: a systematic review of safety. Crit Care Med 45:1285–1294
Wan L, Langenberg C, Bellomo R, May CN (2009) Angiotensin II in experimental hyperdynamic sepsis. Crit Care 13:R190
Chawla LS, Busse L, Brasha-Mitchell E, Davison D, Honiq J, Alotaibi Z et al (2014) Intravenous angiotensin II for the treatment of high-output shock (ATHOS trial): a pilot study. Crit Care 18:534
Chawla LS, Russell JA, Bagshaw SM, Shaw AD, Goldstein SL, Fink MP et al (2017) Angiotensin II for the treatment of high-output shock 3 (ATHOS-3): protocol for a phase III, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Crit Care Resusc 19:43–49
Khanna A, English SW, Wang XS, Ham K, Tumlin J, Szerlip H et al (2017) Angiotensin II for the treatment of vasodilatory shock. New Engl J Med 377:419–430
Carà GA, Pasin L, Alborino E, Zarbock A, Bellomo R, Landoni G (2022) Angiotensin II—a brief review and role in severe SARS-COV-2 Sepsis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 36:4496–4500
Meersch M, Weiss R, Massoth C, Kuellmar M, Saadat-Gilani K, Busen M et al (2022) The association between angiotensin II and renin kinetics in patients after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 134:1002–1009
Tumlin JA, Murugan R, Deane AM, Ostermann M, Busse LW, Ham KR et al (2018) Outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock and renal replacement therapy treated with intravenous angiotensin II. Crit Care Med 46:949–957
Bellomo R, Wunderink RG, Szerlip H, English SW, Busse LW, Deane AM et al (2020) Angiotensin I and angiotensin II concentrations and their ratio in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Crit Care 24:43
Bellomo R, Forni LG, Busse LW, McCurdy MT, Ham KR, Boldt DW et al (2020) Renin and survival in patients given angiotensin II for catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 202:1253–1261
Wieruszewski PM, Bellomo R, Busse LW, Ham KR, Zarbock A (2023) Initiating angiotensin II at lower vasopressor doses in vasodilatory shock: an exploratory post-hoc analysis of the ATHOS-3 clinical trial. Crit Care 27:175
Leisman DE, Privratsky JR, Lehman JR, Abraham MN, Yaipan OY et al (2022) Angiotensin II enhances bacterial clearance via myeloid signalling in a murine sepsis model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2211370119
Coulson TG, Miles LF, Serpa Neto A, Pilcher D, Weinberg L, Landoni G et al (2022) A double-blind randomised feasibility trial of angiotensin-2 in cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 77:999–1009
Coulson TG, Miles LF, Zarbock A, Burrell LM, Patel SK, von Groote T et al (2023) Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system dynamics after targeted blood pressure control using angiotensin II or norepinephrine in cardiac surgery: mechanistic randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 131:664–672
See EJ, Clapham C, Liu J, Khasin M, Liskaser G, Chan JW et al (2023) A pilot study of angiotensin II as primary vasopressor in critically ill adults with vasodilatory hypotension: the ARAMIS study. Shock 59:691–696
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RB wrote the first draft. RB, AZ, and GL developed the text, concepts, and content and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
RB has received grants and consultancy fees from La Jolla Pharmaceuticals, Paion AG, and Viatris. AZ has received consulting fees from Astute-Biomerieux, Baxter, Bayer, Novartis, Guard Therapeutics, AM Pharma, Paion, Fresenius, research funding from Astute-Biomerieux, Fresenius, Baxter, and speaker fees from Astute-Biomerieux, Fresenius, Baxter, and Paion. GL has received speaker fees from Medis, Paion, and Viatris and consultancy fees from Paion and Viatris.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bellomo, R., Zarbock, A. & Landoni, G. Angiotensin II. Intensive Care Med 50, 279–282 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07290-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07290-7