Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
Critical illness can cause new or worsened physical, mental and cognitive symptoms following intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), which can persist for years [1]. ICU patients treated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) frequently experience symptoms of PICS 1 year after ICU treatment; however, their long-term outcomes beyond the first year are largely unknown [2]. We therefore conducted a 2-years follow-up study to further guide ICU (after) care.
This prospective longitudinal cohort study was part of the MONITOR-IC study which was conducted in 7 Dutch hospitals [3]. All adult ICU patients admitted with COVID-19 between 1st March 2020 and 1st June 2020 who survived ICU treatment were eligible. Outcomes were measured at 1-year and 2-years follow-up using a paper or online based survey. A detailed overview of the methods is described in the electronic supplementary materials (ESM, Methods). The primary outcomes were the occurrence of physical (frail, fatigue, new physical problems), mental (anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder) and cognitive symptoms (ESM, Table 1). Secondary outcomes were Quality of Life (QoL) and work-related problems. Differences between 1-year and 2-year outcomes were examined.
In total, 292 ICU survivors were eligible and 183 were included of whom 122 (66.7%) completed the questionnaire at both time-points (ESM, Fig. 1). Their mean age was 61.5 (standard deviation [SD], 9.5) years and 28.7% were female (ESM, Table 2). Compared to 1-year follow-up, the occurrence of physical (73.8% vs. 74.4%, p = 1.00) and cognitive symptoms (14.2% vs 20.8%, p = 0.17) remained significant, and the occurrence of mental symptoms even increased (19.8% vs 29.5%, p = 0.01) after 2 years (Table 1). The most frequently experienced physical problems after 1 year, as well as after 2 years, were a weakened condition and musculoskeletal problems (ESM, Fig. 2). QoL was similar between 1-year and 2-year follow-up. At 2-year follow-up, fewer survivors experienced work-related problems compared to the 1-year follow-up (1-year: 66% vs 2-year: 32%, p = 0.04).
Our findings show that the post-ICU sequalae after ICU treatment for COVID-19 remains significant up to 2 years after treatment. In fact, most survivors do not seem to recover from their symptoms within 2 years and even experience an increase in mental symptoms. Studies exploring PICS in non-COVID-19 patients with acute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS) reported that survivors experience persisting or newly developed symptoms beyond the first year after ICU treatment, similar to our findings in COVID-19 survivors [1, 4]. The role of COVID-19 and the pandemic in the development of PICS remain largely unclear; however, new impairments after COVID-19, often referred to as ‘long COVID’, seem to be more severe in patients treated in the ICU compared to those treated in wards only or ambulatory patients at 2-year follow-up [5]. These findings highlight the importance of prolonged follow-up after ICU treatment for COVID-19, with a more attentive approach on mental rehabilitation. We advocate for the implementation of structured, multidisciplinary, rehabilitation programs, programs for ICU patients treated for COVID-19, just as for other ICU patients, to prevent or mitigate prolonged post-ICU related impairments.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hopkins RO, Weaver LK, Collingridge D et al (2005) Two-year cognitive, emotional, and quality-of-life outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200406-763OC
Heesakkers H, van der Hoeven JG, Corsten S et al (2022) Clinical outcomes among patients with 1-year survival following intensive care unit treatment for COVID-19. JAMA 327:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0040
Geense W, Zegers M, Vermeulen H et al (2017) MONITOR-IC study, a mixed methods prospective multicentre controlled cohort study assessing 5-year outcomes of ICU survivors and related healthcare costs: a study protocol. BMJ Open 7:e018006. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018006
Herridge MS, Moss M, Hough CL et al (2016) Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers. Intensive Care Med 42:725–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4321-8
Huang L, Li X, Gu X et al (2022) Health outcomes in people 2 years after surviving hospitalisation with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00126-6
Acknowledgements
On behalf of the MONITOR-IC study group: Stijn Corsten, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Inge Janssen, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maasziekenhuis Pantein, Boxmeer, The Netherlands; Esther Ewalds, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands; Koen S. Simons, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ’s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands; Dominique Burgers-Bonthuis, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Thijs C. D. Rettig, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Funding
No funding or financial support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
HH had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. HH, JGH, MB, MZ contributed to study concept and design. HH, MZ, MB contributed to analysis and interpretation of data. HH contributed to drafting of the article. JGH, SC, IJ, EE, KSS, DB-B, MB, MZ contributed to critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. MB, MZ both supervised the study. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet the ICMJE authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the medical ethical committee of Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CMO) (CMO-number—2020-6878).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participating ICU survivors and family members.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The members of the MONITOR-IC research group are listed in the Acknowledgement section of the manuscript.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heesakkers, H., van der Hoeven, J.G., van den Boogaard, M. et al. Two-year physical, mental and cognitive outcomes among intensive care unit survivors treated for COVID-19. Intensive Care Med 49, 597–599 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07038-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07038-3