Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Osteoporose – Risikoevaluation und „case finding“

Osteoporosis—risk evaluation and case finding

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Orthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Osteoporose ist eine der häufigsten und gleichzeitig am wenigsten diagnostizierten oder therapierten Erkrankungen. Die häufigsten Gründe für Unterdiagnostizierung und Untertherapie sowie deren Lösungsmöglichkeiten im ambulanten und stationären Bereich werden aufgezeigt und diskutiert.

Abstract

Osteoporosis is one of the major diseases worldwide but is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. The most common reasons for underdiagnosis and undertreatment in ambulatory settings are demonstrated and potential solutions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

DMP:

Disease-Management-Programme

DVO:

Dachverband Osteologie

Literatur

  1. Haeussler B, Gothe H, Mangiapane S et al (2006) Outpatient care for osteoporosis patients in Germany. Results of the BoneEVA study. Dtsch Arztebl Int 103:A-2542

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hadji P, Klein S, Gothe H et al (2013) The Epidemiology of Osteoporosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110:52–57

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Desai RJ, Mahesri M, Abdia Y et al (2018) Association of osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture with prevention of subsequent Nonvertebral fractures: an instrumental variable analysis. Jama Netw Open 1:e180826. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0826

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong RMY, Wong PY, Liu C et al (2022) The imminent risk of a fracture-existing worldwide data: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 33:2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06473-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuerburg C, Heberer K, Heberer J (2015) Unterlassene Osteoporosediagnostik und -therapie nach Fraktur im Alter. Unfallchirurg 118:938–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-015-0072-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hesse E, Böcker W, Kammerlander C et al (2019) Establishment of fracture liaison services in Germany. Unfallchirurg 122:766–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-00705-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuncel T, Hasselberg J, Peters KM (2017) Compliance der medikamentösen Behandlung der Osteoporosepatienten nach Patientenschulung. Orthopäde 46:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3346-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrar L, Roux C, Felsenberg D et al (2012) Association between incident and baseline vertebral fractures in European women: vertebral fracture assessment in the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS). Osteoporos Int 23:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1701-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomasius F, Baum E, Bernecker P et al (2018) DVO Leitlinie 2017 zur Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie der Osteoporose bei postmenopausalen Frauen und Männern: Kurzversion. Osteologie 27:154–160. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niedhart C, Karrenberg C (2019) Treatment of osteoporosis in the outpatient field : possibilities and challenges. Unfallchirurg 122:771–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-00711-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai JKC, Lucas RM, Armstrong M et al (2013) Prospective observational study of physical functioning, physical activity, and time outdoors and the risk of hip fracture: a population-based cohort study of 158,057 older adults in the 45 and up study. J Bone Miner Res 28:2222–2231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadji P, Jacob L, Kostev K (2016) Gender- and age-related treatment compliance in patients with osteoporosis in Germany. Patient Prefer Adherence 10:2379–2385. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S118396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ et al (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.4065/81.8.1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gogol M et al (2016) Klug entscheiden in der Geriatrie. Dtsch Ärztebl 113:1756–1760

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kostev K, Rockel T, Jacob L (2017) Impact of disease management programs on HbA1c values in type 2 diabetes patients in Germany. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816651633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Niedhart C, Preising A, Eichhorn C (2013) Significant reduction of osteoporosis fracture-related hospitalisation rate due to intensified, multimodal treatment – results from the Integrated Health Care Network Osteoporosis North Rhine. Z Orthop Unfall 151:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Osteologisches Schwerpunktzentrum, Liecker Str. 23, 52525, Heinsberg, Deutschland

    Christopher Niedhart

  2. Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland

    Christopher Niedhart

Authors
  1. Christopher Niedhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Niedhart.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Niedhart: Honorare für Vorträge, Reisekostenerstattung oder Beratertätigkeit (Advisory Board) von Alexion, AMGEN, Bundesamt für soziale Sicherung, Fortbildungskolleg, Medi, Medicbrain, Schlegel und Schmidt med. Kommunikation GmbH, Streamed Up, Theramex, TÜV Rheinland und UCB Pharma.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niedhart, C. Osteoporose – Risikoevaluation und „case finding“. Orthopädie 52, 787–792 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-023-04431-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-023-04431-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation