Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osteoporose: Behandlung von Hochrisikopatient*innen

Osteoporosis: treatment of high-risk patients

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Orthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Zur spezifischen medikamentösen Therapie der Osteoporose stehen Antiresorptiva (Raloxifen, Bisphosphonate, Denosumab) und Osteoanabolika (Teriparatid und Romosozumab) zur Verfügung. Für beide Osteoanabolika konnte in randomisierten Vergleichsstudien eine Überlegenheit gegenüber oralen Bisphosphonaten bei Hochrisikopatient*innen gezeigt werden. Hochrisikopatient*innen stellen eine Untergruppe der behandlungsbedürftigen Osteoporosepatient*innen mit besonders hohem Frakturrisiko dar. Das sehr hohe Risiko ist an der Klinik (Femur- oder Wirbelkörperfraktur), dem sehr niedrigen T‑Score und/oder den klinischen Risikofaktoren (Überschreitung der osteoanabolen Schwelle des DVO-Risikorechners) zu erkennen. Hochrisikopatient*innen sollten in erster Therapielinie mit Osteoanabolika behandelt werden. Antiresorptiv vorbehandelte Patient*innen, die erst im Verlauf ein sehr hohes Risiko entwickeln, sollten auf Osteoanabolika eskaliert werden. Jede osteoanabole Therapie erfordert eine antiresorptive Anschlusstherapie. Therapiepausen sind bei Hochrisikopatient*innen nur in Ausnahmefällen möglich.

Abstract

Nowadays, different drugs are available for specific treatment of osteoporosis. On the one hand, antiresorptives (raloxifene, bisphosphonates, denosumab) and, on the other hand, bone anabolic drugs (teriparatide and romosozumab) can be used. For both bone anabolic agents, superiority over oral bisphosphonates in high-risk patients was shown in randomized comparative studies. High-risk patients represent a subgroup of osteoporosis patients requiring treatment with a particularly high fracture risk. The very high risk can be recognized by the clinical manifestation (hip or vertebral fracture), the very low T‑score and/or the clinical risk factors (exceeding the bone anabolic threshold of the DVO risk calculator). High-risk patients should be treated with bone anabolic drugs in the first line of treatment. Patients treated with antiresorptives, who develop a very high risk in the course of the disease should be escalated to bone anabolic compounds. Every bone anabolic treatment requires an antiresorptive follow-up treatment. Drug holidays are only possible in exceptional cases for high-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Abbreviations

AACE:

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology

ACE:

American College of Endocrinology

AFF:

Atypische Femurfrakturen

ARCH:

Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis at High Risk

BHOF:

Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation

BMI:

Body-Mass-Index

CKD:

„Chronic kidney disease“

DVO:

Dachverband Osteologie

DXA:

Dual-Röntgen-Absorptiometrie

ESCEO:

European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases

FRAX:

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool

GFR:

Glomeruläre Filtrationsrate

IOF:

International Osteoporosis Foundation

iPTH:

Intaktes Parathormon

LWS:

Lendenwirbelsäule

MOF:

„Major osteoporotic fractures“

NOGG:

National Osteoporosis Guideline Group

ONJ:

Kieferknochennekrosen

RR:

Relatives Risiko

SERM:

Selektive Östrogenrezeptormodulatoren

SIGN:

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network

SVGO:

Schweizerische Vereinigung gegen Osteoporose

VERO:

VERtebral fracture treatment comparisons in Osteoporotic women

WHO:

World Health Organization

WK#:

Wirbelkörperfraktur, Graduierung nach Genant

Literatur

  1. Bliuc D, Alarkawi D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2015) Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. J Bone Miner Res 30(4):637–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2393 (PMID: 25359586)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drey M, Henkel M, Petermeise S, Weiß S, Ferrari U, Rottenkolber M, Schmidmaier R (2020) Assessment of bone and muscle measurements by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in geriatric patients. J Clin Densitom 23(4):604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.002 (Epub 2018 Oct 12. PMID: 30425007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Siris ES (2022) The clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 33(10):2049–2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y (Epub 2022 Apr 28. Erratum in: Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jul 28;: PMID: 35478046; PMCID: PMC9546973)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey NC, Odén A, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, Sigurdsson G, Kanis JA (2017) Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporos Int 28(3):775–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0 (Epub 2016 Dec 27. PMID: 28028554; PMCID: PMC5338733)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Odén A, Harvey NC, Gudnason V, Sanders KM, Sigurdsson G, Siggeirsdottir K, Fitzpatrick LA, Borgström F, McCloskey EV (2018) Characteristics of recurrent fractures. Osteoporos Int 29(8):1747–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4502-0 (Epub 2018 Jun 12. PMID: 29947869; PMCID: PMC6076437)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Laura I, Felicia B, Alexia C, Aude M, Florence B, Murielle S, Rafik K, Jean-Jacques B, Pierre B (2021) Which treatment to prevent an imminent fracture? Bone Rep 9(15):101105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101105 (PMID: 34386562; PMCID: PMC8342786)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Black DM, Bauer DC, Vittinghoff E, Lui LY, Grauer A, Marin F, Khosla S, de Papp A, Mitlak B, Cauley JA, McCulloch CE, Eastell R, Bouxsein ML, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Bone Quality Project (2020) Treatment-related changes in bone mineral density as a surrogate biomarker for fracture risk reduction: meta-regression analyses of individual patient data from multiple randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(8):672–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30159-5 (Erratum in: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Oct;8(10):e5. PMID: 32707115)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Söreskog E, Lindberg I, Kanis JA, Åkesson KE, Willems D, Lorentzon M, Ström O, Berling P, Borgström F (2021) Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 32(3):585–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05780-8 (Epub 2021 Jan 6. PMID: 33409591; PMCID: PMC7929944)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, Maddox J, Fan M, Meisner PD, Grauer A (2017) Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 377(15):1417–1427. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1708322 (Epub 2017 Sep 11. PMID: 28892457)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Möricke R, López-Romero P (2018) Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391(10117):230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2 (Epub 2017 Nov 9. Erratum in: Lancet. 2017 Nov 30; Erratum in: Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2352. PMID: 29129436)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari S, Lippuner K, Lamy O, Meier C (2020) 2020 recommendations for osteoporosis treatment according to fracture risk from the Swiss Association against Osteoporosis (SVGO). Swiss Med Wkly 29(150):w20352. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20352 (PMID: 33038260)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis EM, Reginster JY, Al-Daghri N, Biver E, Brandi ML, Cavalier E, Hadji P, Halbout P, Harvey NC, Hiligsmann M, Javaid MK, Kanis JA, Kaufman JM, Lamy O, Matijevic R, Perez AD, Radermecker RP, Rosa MM, Thomas T, Thomasius F, Vlaskovska M, Rizzoli R, Cooper C (2022) Management of patients at very high risk of osteoporotic fractures through sequential treatments. Aging Clin Exp Res 34(4):695–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02100-4 (Epub 2022 Mar 24. PMID: 35332506; PMCID: PMC9076733)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McCloskey E, Rathi J, Heijmans S, Blagden M, Cortet B, Czerwinski E, Hadji P, Payer J, Palmer K, Stad R, O’Kelly J, Papapoulos S (2021) The osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in European primary care: a multi-country cross-sectional observational study. Osteoporos Int 32(2):251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05557-z (Epub 2020 Aug 23. PMID: 32829471; PMCID: PMC7838133)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B, Stewart A, Garratt E, Wiessing KR, Bolland MJ, Bastin S, Gamble GD (2019) Anti-fracture efficacy of zoledronate in subgroups of osteopenic postmenopausal women: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 286(2):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12901 (Epub 2019 Apr 8. PMID: 30887607)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu CH, Hung WC, Chang IL, Tsai TT, Chang YF, McCloskey EV, Watts NB, McClung MR, Huang CF, Chen CH, Wu KL, Tsai KS, Chan DC, Chen JF, Tu ST, Hwang JS, Xia W, Matsumoto T, Chung YS, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Yang RS, Chan WP (2020) Pharmacologic intervention for prevention of fractures in osteopenic and osteoporotic postmenopausal women: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Bone Rep 27(13):100729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100729 (PMID: 33195764; PMCID: PMC7645632)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2021) Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2021. (SIGN publication no. 142). http://www.sign.ac.uk. Zugegriffen: 10. Jan. 2023

  17. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, Harris ST, Hurley DL, Kelly J, Lewiecki EM, Pessah-Pollack R, McClung M, Wimalawansa SJ, Watts NB (2020) American association of clinical endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis—2020 update. Endocr Pract 26(Suppl 1):1–46. https://doi.org/10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL (PMID: 32427503)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Lorentzon M, Liu E, Vandenput L, McCloskey EV (2021) An assessment of intervention thresholds for very high fracture risk applied to the NOGG guidelines : a report for the national osteoporosis guideline group (NOGG). Osteoporos Int 32(10):1951–1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05942-2 (Epub 2021 Apr 4. PMID: 33813622)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fontalis A, Kenanidis E, Prousali E, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E (2018) Safety and efficacy of denosumab in osteoporotic patients previously treated with other medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 17(4):413–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2018.1430764 (Epub 2018 Jan 25. PMID: 29350565)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saito T, Mizobuchi M, Kato T, Suzuki T, Fujiwara Y, Kanamori N, Makuuchi M, Honda H (2023) One-year romosozumab treatment followed by one-year Denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in patients on hemodialysis: an observational study. Calcif Tissue Int 112(1):34–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-022-01031-6 (Epub 2022 Oct 26. PMID: 36287217)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato M, Inaba M, Yamada S, Emoto M, Ohno Y, Tsujimoto Y (2021) Efficacy of romosozumab in patients with osteoporosis on maintenance hemodialysis in Japan; an observational study. J Bone Miner Metab 39(6):1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-021-01253-y (Epub 2021 Jul 29. PMID: 34324082)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eastell R, Nickelsen T, Marin F, Barker C, Hadji P, Farrerons J, Audran M, Boonen S, Brixen K, Gomes JM, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Avramidis A, Sigurdsson G, Glüer CC (2009) Sequential treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis after teriparatide: final results of the randomized, controlled European Study of Forsteo (EUROFORS). J Bone Miner Res 24(4):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.081215 (PMID: 19049337)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Kono T, Sudo A (2018) Efficacy of switching from teriparatide to bisphosphonate or denosumab: a prospective, randomized, open-label trial. Jbmr Plus 2(5):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10054 (PMID: 30283910; PMCID: PMC6139701)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, Hofbauer LC, Lau E, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Zerbini CA, Milmont CE, Chen L, Maddox J, Meisner PD, Libanati C, Grauer A (2016) Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 375(16):1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607948 (Epub 2016 Sep 18. PMID: 27641143)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elbers LPB, Raterman HG, Lems WF (2021) Bone mineral density loss and fracture risk after discontinuation of anti-osteoporotic drug treatment: a narrative review. Drugs 81(14):1645–1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-021-01587-x (Epub 2021 Sep 15. PMID: 34524681; PMCID: PMC8519894)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Adler RA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Bauer DC, Camacho PM, Clarke BL, Clines GA, Compston JE, Drake MT, Edwards BJ, Favus MJ, Greenspan SL, McKinney R Jr, Pignolo RJ, Sellmeyer DE (2016) Managing osteoporosis in patients on long-term bisphosphonate treatment: report of a task force of the American society for bone and mineral research. J Bone Miner Res 31(1):16–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2708 (Erratum in: J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Oct;31(10 ):1910. PMID: 26350171; PMCID: PMC4906542)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, Czerwiński E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler DL, Lippuner K, Reginster JY, Roux C, Malouf J, Bradley MN, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Dakin P, Pannacciulli N, Dempster DW, Papapoulos S (2017) 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5(7):513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9 (Epub 2017 May 22. PMID: 28546097)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ebina K, Tsuboi H, Nagayama Y, Kashii M, Kaneshiro S, Miyama A, Nakaya H, Kunugiza Y, Hirao M, Okamura G, Etani Y, Takami K, Goshima A, Miura T, Nakata K, Okada S (2021) Effects of prior osteoporosis treatment on 12-month treatment response of romosozumab in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 88(5):105219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105219 (Epub 2021 May 19. PMID: 34020048)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McClung MR, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Reginster JY, Langdahl BL, Shi Y, Timoshanko J, Libanati C, Chines A, Oates MK (2021) Skeletal responses to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab. Jbmr Plus 5(7):e10512–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10512 (PMID: 34258507; PMCID: PMC8260819)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Leder BZ, Tsai JN, Uihlein AV, Wallace PM, Lee H, Neer RM, Burnett-Bowie SA (2015) Denosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(9999):1147–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61120-5 (Epub 2015 Jul 2. PMID: 26144908; PMCID: PMC4620731)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C, Body JJ, Gonzalez Rodriguez E, Anastasilakis AD, Abrahamsen B, McCloskey E, Hofbauer LC, Guañabens N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Eastell R, Pepe J, Palermo A, Langdahl B (2020) Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 26:dgaa756. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa756 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33103722)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shoback D, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Eastell R (2020) Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an endocrine society guideline update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(3):dgaa48. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa048 (PMID: 32068863)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. NOGG (2021) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. https://www.nogg.org.uk/full-guideline. Zugegriffen: 26.08.2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Schmidmaier.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Schmidmaier erhielt Vortragshonorare von Amgen, Lilly und UCB, sowie Beraterhonorare von Amgen.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidmaier, R. Osteoporose: Behandlung von Hochrisikopatient*innen. Orthopädie 52, 799–807 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-023-04430-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-023-04430-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation