Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inverse Schultertotalendprothese bei Rotatorenmanschettendefektarthropathie

Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Eine fortgeschrittene RM-Ruptur mit Sehnenretraktion, fettiger Infiltration und Atrophie der RM-Muskulatur kann den Humerus im Glenohumeralgelenk nicht mehr suffizient zentrieren. Es entwickelt sich eine RM-Defektarthropathie als exzentrische Arthrose mit einer Azetabularisierung und einem Verbrauch des Akromions und des Glenoids.

Indikation

Bei schmerzhafter Pseudoparalyse des Arms ist die Implantation einer inversen Schulter-TEP (rTSA) zur Reduktion der Schmerzen und Wiederherstellung der aktiven Beweglichkeit indiziert. Die rTSA verbessert durch eine Medialisierung und Kaudalisierung des glenohumeralen Drehzentrums mit Optimierung des Hebelarms die motorische Aktivität des Deltamuskels. Gleichzeitig erhöht die rTSA die glenohumerale Stabilität und ist somit auch bei kraniokaudal zentrierten Omarthrosen mit statischer humeraler posteriorer Dezentrierung bei einem bikonkaven Glenoidverbrauch indiziert.

Therapie

Gegenwärtig zeigt die humerale anatomische Resektion von 135° Inklination und 20–40° Retrotorsion bei der rTSA im Vergleich zur ursprünglichen 155°-Inklination Vorteile in der Beweglichkeit ohne Defizite in der Stabilität. Zusätzlich sollte das Offset über eine knöcherne glenoidale Augmentation wiederhergestellt werden. Bei positivem Außenrotations-Lag-Zeichen aufgrund einer M.-infraspinatus/teres-minor-Insuffizienz verbessert eine M.-latissimus/teres-major-Sehnen-Ersatzplastik die aktive Außenrotation. Der M. subscapularis sollte beim deltopektoralen Zugang zugunsten der anterioren Stabilität bei der rTSA wenn möglich refixiert werden. Größere Glenosphären erhöhen die Stabilität und Beweglichkeit. Durch humerale metaphysäre Metallliner mit Polyethylen(PE)-Glenosphären können bei einem Anschlagen des humeralen Liners am inferioren Skapulahals Osteolysen durch fehlenden PE-Abrieb vermieden werden.

Abstract

Background

In a progredient rotator cuff tear with tendon retraction, fatty infiltration and atrophy of rotator cuff muscles the humerus cannot be centered and stabilized sufficiently in the glenohumeral joint. This leads to rotator cuff defect arthropathy as an eccentric osteoarthritis with acetabularization and wear of the acromion, as well as of the glenoid.

Indication

A painful pseudoparalysis of the shoulder indicates the implantation of a reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) to reduce pain and restore active motion. The rTSA improves the motoric function of the deltoid muscle by medialization and caudalization of the center of rotation via an optimized lever arm and is also indicated in cranio-caudally centered osteoarthritis with static posterior humeral decentration due to a bi-concavely eroded glenoid.

Therapy

Currently, humeral anatomical resection with an inclination of 135° and a humeral retrotorsion of 20–40°, in rTSA in contrast to 155° inclination, has been shown to lead to better glenohumeral motion without loss of stability. Additionally, a reduced glenohumeral offset should be restored by especially bony lateral augmentation of the glenoid. In a pre-operatively positive lag sign for external rotation caused by a rupture of the infraspinatus/teres minor tendon, a lateral latissimus/teres major muscle tendon transfer in rTSA can optimize active external rotation. The tendon of the subscapularis muscle should be re-fixated in the deltopectoral approach for rTSA whenever possible for better anterior stability of the glenohumeral joint. Larger diameters of the glenospheres have been shown to have more stability and better motion. Humeral metaphyseal metal liners with corresponding polyethylene glenospheres can avoid osteolysis of the inferior scapular neck caused by polyethylene debris due to impingement of the humeral liner at the scapular neck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Abbreviations

AC-Gelenk:

Akromioklavikulargelenk

LD:

M. latissimus major

PE:

Polyethylen

RM:

Rotatorenmanschette

rTSA:

Inverse Schulter-TEP

SSC:

M. subscapularis

TEP:

Totalendoprothese

TM:

M. teres major

Literatur

  1. Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2013) Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:887–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boileau P, Gonzalez JF, Chuinard C et al (2009) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after failed rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y et al (2011) Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2558–2567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Gauci MO et al (2017) Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management glenoid bone loss and erosion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26(12):2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Rumian AP, Zumstein MA (2010) Reversed shoulder arthroplasty with modified L’Episcopo for combined loss of active elevation and external rotation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:20–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM et al (2006) Neer award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:527–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou J, Malak SF, Anderson IA et al (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: range of motion and risk of scapular notching. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:354–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dedy NJ, Gouk CJ, Taylor FJ, Thomas M, Tan SLE (2018) Sonographic assessment of the subscapularis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: impact of tendon integrity on shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.008. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Denard PJ, Walch G (2013) Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a biconcave glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1589–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman RJ, Flurin PH, Wright TW et al (2017) Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:662–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grammont P, Trouilloud P, Laffay J et al (1987) Etude de réalisation d’une nouvelle prothèse d’épaule. Rhumatologie 39:407–418

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grammont PM, Baulot E (2011) The classic: delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M et al (1990) Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:92–96

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamada K, Yamanaka K, Uchiyama Y et al (2011) A radiographic classification of massive rotator cuff tear arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2452–2460

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Holschen D, Agneskirchner JD (2014) Inverse Schulterprothese – Indikation, Operationstechnik und Ergebnisse. Arthroskopie 37(1):38–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-013-0771-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Irlenbusch U, Kaab MJ, Kohut G et al (2015) Reversed shoulder arthroplasty with inversed bearing materials: 2‑year clinical and radiographic results in 101 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kontaxis A, Chen X, Berhouet J et al (2017) Humeral version in reverse shoulder arthroplasty affects impingement in activities of daily living. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1073–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ladermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P et al (2015) Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:2205–2213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L et al (2008) Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:925–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levigne C, Garret J, Boileau P et al (2011) Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2512–2520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levy O, Narvani A, Hous N et al (2016) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2‑ to 7‑year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1362–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy O, Walecka J, Arealis G et al (2017) Bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-functional outcome and activities of daily living. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:e85–e96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mackenzie DB (1993) The antero-superior approach for total shoulder replacement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P et al (2012) The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere. Int Orthop 36:1647–1653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P et al (2013) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1297–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mole D, Wein F, Dezaly C et al (2011) Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2461–2468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Muller AM, Born M, Jung C et al (2017) Glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is larger better for external rotation and abduction strength? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Neer CS 2nd, Craig EV, Fukuda H (1983) Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1232–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS et al (2006) Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:625–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C (2005) Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:524–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oh JH, Shin SJ, Mcgarry MH et al (2014) Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1091–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Patzer T, Hufeland M, Krauspe R (2016) Irreparable rotator cuff tears. Debridement, partial reconstruction, tendon transfer or reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopäde 45:149–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Puskas GJ, Catanzaro S, Gerber C (2014) Clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of chronic combined pseudoparesis of elevation and external rotation of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seebauer L, Walter W, Keyl W (2005) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of defect arthropathy. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17:1–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:388–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stechel A, Fuhrmann U, Irlenbusch L et al (2010) Reversed shoulder arthroplasty in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 81:367–372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Stephenson DR, Oh JH, Mcgarry MH et al (2011) Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:652–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vourazeris JD, Wright TW, Struk AM et al (2017) Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in patients with subscapularis repair versus tenotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:450–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Werner BS, Chaoui J, Walch G (2017) The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1726–1731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J et al (2011) Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:146–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Patzer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T. Patzer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patzer, T. Inverse Schultertotalendprothese bei Rotatorenmanschettendefektarthropathie. Orthopäde 47, 390–397 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3543-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3543-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation