Abstract
Background
The anterosuperior approach used for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an intermediate between the transacromial approach originally proposed by Paul Grammont and the anterosuperior approach described by D. B. Mackenzie for shoulder arthroplasty. As an alternative to the deltopectoral approach, the anterosuperior approach has the advantages of simplicity and postoperative stability.
Description of Technique
The anterior deltoid is divided from the anterior edge of the acromioclavicular arch, allowing exposure to the glenoid for glenosphere implantation.
Patients and Methods
We used the findings of published studies to assess instability, function and pain scores, scapular notching, and complications after this approach.
Results
In a comparison of the deltopectoral and anterosuperior approaches in 527 reverse arthroplasties with a minimum 2-year followup, postoperative instability rate was greater with the deltopectoral (5.1%) than with the anterosuperior (0.8%) approach. Other published studies confirm this finding. No differences in Constant-Murley score or active mobility were found. Scapular notching occurred at similar rates after the anterosuperior (74%) and deltopectoral (63%) approaches. Humeral diaphyseal fracture rates were similar, whereas the acromial fracture rate was higher using the deltopectoral approach. Loosening tended to occur more often with the anterosuperior approach.
Conclusions
The anterosuperior approach can be used in primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty, as well as in acute humeral head fracture. Its main apparent advantages are simplicity, ease of axial humerus preparation, quality of frontal exposure of the glenoid, and due to subscapularis tendon preservation, a low risk of postoperative instability. Its drawbacks are risk of inaccurate glenoid positioning, axillary nerve palsy, and deltoid weakening.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boileau P, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Bicknell RT, Rochet N, Trojani C. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a modified latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for shoulder pseudoparalysis associated with dropping arm. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:584–593.
Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer Award 2005. The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:527–540.
Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:516–520.
Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty: radiological outcome for acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:325–329.
Chacon A, Virani N, Shannon R, Levy JC, Pupello D, Frankle M. Revision arthroplasty with use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-allograft composite. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:119–127.
Cuff DJ, Virani NA, Levy J, Frankle MA, Derasari A, Hines B, Pupello DR, Cancio M, Mighell M. The treatment of deep shoulder infection and glenohumeral instability with debridement, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and postoperative antibiotics. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:336–342.
Delloye C, Joris D, Colette A, Eudier A, Dubuc JE. [Mechanical complications of total shoulder inverted prosthesis] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002;88:410–414.
Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency: a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1697–1705.
Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:48–55.
Grammont PM, Baulot E. Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics. 1993;16:65–68.
Holcomb JO, Cuff D, Petersen SA, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:717–723.
Lévigne C. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F, eds. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Nice Shoulder Course. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Médical; 2006:353–372.
Mackenzie DB. The antero-superior exposure for total shoulder replacement. Orthop Traumatol. 1993;2:71–77.
Mackenzie DB. The antero-superior exposure for total shoulder replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:S114.
Molé D, Favard L. [Excentered scapulohumeral osteoarthritis] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;93(6 Suppl):37–94.
Neviaser JS. Surgical approaches to the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;91:34–40.
Nové-Josserand L. Instability of the reverse prosthesis. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F, eds. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Nice Shoulder Course. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Médical; 2006:247–260.
Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber C. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:588–600.
Valenti P, Sauzieres P, Cogswell L, O’Toole G, Katz D. The reverse shoulder prosthesis—surgical technique. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2008;12:46–55.
Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C. Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1476–1486.
Young SW, Everts NM, Ball CM, Astley TM, Poon PC. The SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:622–626.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Each author certifies that he has no commercial association (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
This work was performed at the Clinique de Traumatologie et d’Orthopedie.
About this article
Cite this article
Molé, D., Wein, F., Dézaly, C. et al. Surgical Technique: The Anterosuperior Approach for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 2461–2468 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1861-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1861-7