Skip to main content
Log in

Schulterendoprothetik im Alter

Hemi- oder Totalendoprothese? Anatomisch oder invers?

Shoulder endoprosthesis in the elderly

Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Neben der Standardversorgung mit anatomischen Schultertotalendoprothesen rückt bei älteren Patienten die Implantation von inversen Schulterendoprothesen immer mehr in den Vordergrund. Ursachen sind die steigende Lebenserwartung, die altersabhängige Degeneration der Rotatorenmanschette mit Ausbildung der Defektarthropathie, posttraumatische Zustände nach gescheiterter Osteosynthese und die primäre inverse Frakturendoprothetik. Die primäre Omarthrose mit erhaltener Rotatorenmanschette wird zunehmend mit schaftfreien Humerusimplantaten auch beim älteren Menschen versorgt, wobei die Knochenqualität limitierend ist. Moderne Endoprothesensysteme ermöglichen den schrittweisen Aufbau von knochensparenden Primärimplantaten zu modularen und konvertierbaren Revisionsimplantaten mit der Möglichkeit zu Teilwechseln. Die Revisionschirurgie, speziell von inversen Implantaten, bietet nur wenige Rückzugsmöglichkeiten, weshalb die Implantationen und Revisionen in spezialisierten Zentren durchgeführt werden sollten.

Abstract

Implantation of reverse shoulder endoprostheses is becoming more popular for elderly patients besides the well-established standard anatomic endoprostheses. The reasons for this are the increased life expectancy, age-dependent degeneration of the rotator cuff leading to cuff tear arthropathy, posttraumatic disability after failed osteosynthesis and primary reverse fracture arthroplasty. Stemless implants are more frequently used for primary osteoarthritis with the bone quality being the limiting factor. Modern implant systems allow the stepwise extension from bone preserving primary implants to modular and convertible revision implants that allow a partial exchange of components. Revision surgery, especially that of reverse arthroplasty, has limited potential for secondary treatment options and therefore implantation and revision should be performed in specialized treatment facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Abdel MP, Hattrup SJ, Sperling JW et al (2013) Revision of an unstable hemiarthroplasty or anatomical total shoulder replacement using a reverse design prosthesis. Bone Joint J 95-B:668–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambacher T (2013) Options and limits of stemless shoulder prostheses. Orthopäde 42:495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2015) 12th Annual report. National joint registry, Hemel Hempstead, S 1–179

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous (2015) Annual report. National joint replacement registry. Australian Orthopaedic Association, Adalaide, S 1–76

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous (2015) Årsrapport. Svenska Axel Artroplastik Registret, Stockholm, S 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (2015) Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik). Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anonymous (2015) Sixteen year report. January 1999 to December 2014. The New Zealand joint registry. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, Wellington, S 1–172

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal A, Khatib ON, Zuckerman JD (2014) Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York State. J Arthroplasty 29:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartelt R, Sperling JW, Schleck CD et al (2011) Shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty-five years or younger with osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bercik MJ, Kruse K 2nd, Yalizis M et al (2016) A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25:1601. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bilgin SS (2012) Reconstruction of proximal humeral defects with shoulder arthrodesis using free vascularized fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bloch HR, Budassi P, Bischof A et al (2014) Influence of glenosphere design and material on clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow 6:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau P, Gonzalez JF, Chuinard C et al (2009) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after failed rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boileau P, Melis B, Duperron D et al (2013) Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1359–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y et al (2011) Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2558–2567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM et al (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brunner U, Ruckl K, Fruth M (2013) Cuff tear arthropathy – long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopäde 42:522–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Castagna A, Delcogliano M, De Caro F et al (2013) Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system. Int Orthop 37:1297–1305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Castagna A, Randelli M, Garofalo R et al (2010) Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1410–1415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cil A, Veillette CJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J et al (2010) Survivorship of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clement ND, Mathur K, Colling R et al (2010) The metal-backed glenoid component in rheumatoid disease: eight- to fourteen-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:749–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Biase CF, Delcogliano M, Borroni M et al (2012) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: radiological and clinical result using an eccentric glenosphere. Musculoskelet Surg 96(Suppl 1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dezfuli B, King JJ, Farmer KW et al (2016) Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1133–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Favard L (2013) Revision of total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:S12–S21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C et al (2011) Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2469–2475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fink B, Niemeier A, Ruther W (2013) Resurfacing of the humeral head : sensible indications. Orthopäde 42:490–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garofalo R, Flanagin B, Castagna A et al (2015) Long stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty and cerclage for treatment of complex long segment proximal humeral fractures with diaphyseal extension in patients more than 65 years old. Injury 46:2379–2383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garofalo R, Flanagin B, Castagna A et al (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture using a dedicated stem: radiological outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up-case series. J Orthop Surg Res 10:129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Glanzmann MC, Kolling C, Schwyzer HK et al (2016) Conversion to hemiarthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1795. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gohlke F, Rolf O (2007) Revision of failed fracture hemiarthroplasties to reverse total shoulder prosthesis through the transhumeral approach : method incorporating a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:185–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gronhagen CM, Abbaszadegan H, Revay SA et al (2007) Medium-term results after primary hemiarthroplasty for comminute proximal humerus fractures: a study of 46 patients followed up for an average of 4.4 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:766–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F et al (2006) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg 88:1742–1747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Haasters F, Siebenburger G, Helfen T et al (2016) Complications of locked plating for proximal humeral fractures-are we getting any better? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:e295. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Habermeyer P, Kircher J (2010) Standardendoprothetik. In: Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P (Hrsg) Schulterchirurgie. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer, München, S 655–745

    Google Scholar 

  35. Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Tauber M et al (2015) Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:1463–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hartzler RU, Steen BM, Hussey MM et al (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear: risk factors for poor functional improvement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:1698–1706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Holcomb JO, Cuff D, Petersen SA et al (2009) Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hovelius L, Saeboe M (2009) Neer award 2008: arthropathy after primary anterior shoulder dislocation – 223 shoulders prospectively followed up for twenty-five years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Irlenbusch U (2013) Survival rate and complications of stemmed shoulder prostheses in primary osteoarthritis. Orthopäde 42:507–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang JJ, Toor AS, Shi LL et al (2014) Analysis of perioperative complications in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1852–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Khatib O, Onyekwelu I, Yu S et al (2015) Shoulder arthroplasty in New York State, 1991 to 2010: changing patterns of utilization. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:e286–e291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kircher J (2012) Die Omarthrose: Einteilung, Morphologie und Diagnostik. Obere Extremität 7:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kircher J, Kuerner K, Morhard M et al (2014) Age-related joint space narrowing independent of the development of osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Int J Shoulder Surg 8:95–100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kircher J, Morhard M, Gavriilidis I et al (2010) Is there an association between a low acromion index and osteoarthritis of the shoulder? Int Orthop 34:1005–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kircher J, Morhard M, Magosch P et al (2010) How much are radiological parameters related to clinical symptoms and function in osteoarthritis of the shoulder? Int Orthop 34:677–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Loew M (2013) Short stem shoulder prosthesis : concept and first results. Orthopäde 42:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mather RC 3rd, Watters TS, Orlando LA et al (2010) Cost effectiveness analysis of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:325–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Melis B, Bonnevialle N, Neyton L et al (2012) Glenoid loosening and failure in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: is revision with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty a reliable option? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:342–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mercer DM, Gilmer BB, Saltzman MD et al (2011) A quantitative method for determining medial migration of the humeral head after shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary results in assessing glenoid wear at a minimum of two years after hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S et al (2010) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg A 92:2544–2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR et al (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:e1–e25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Owens CJ, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2013) Utility and complications of long-stem humeral components in revision shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:e7–e12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Papadonikolakis A, Matsen FA 3rd (2014) Metal-backed glenoid components have a higher rate of failure and fail by different modes in comparison with all-polyethylene components: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1041–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pape G, Tonne L, Raiss P et al (2013) Prostheses for fractures of the proximal humerus: presentation of current results of anatomical fracture shoulder prosthesis under consideration of alternative concepts. Orthopäde 42:164–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Patzer T, Habermeyer P, Hurschler C et al (2011) Increased glenohumeral translation and biceps load after SLAP lesions with potential influence on glenohumeral chondral lesions: a biomechanical study on human cadavers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1780–1787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Patzer T, Habermeyer P, Hurschler C et al (2012) The influence of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair on restoring baseline glenohumeral translation and increased biceps loading after simulated SLAP tear and the effectiveness of SLAP repair after long head of biceps tenotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1580–1587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Phadnis J, Huang T, Watts A et al (2016) Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. Bone Joint J 98-B:65–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Postacchini R, Castagna A, Borroni M et al (2012) Total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1542–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rhee PC, Sassoon AA, Schleck CD et al (2011) Revision total shoulder arthroplasty for painful glenoid arthrosis after humeral head replacement: the posttraumatic shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:1255–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rosas S, Law TL, Kurowicki J et al (2015) Trends in surgical management of proximal humerus fractures in the medicare population: a nationwide study of records from 2009 to 2012. ASES closed meeting, Asheville, S 56

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sandow MJ, David H, Bentall SJ (2013) Hemiarthroplasty vs total shoulder replacement for rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis: how do they fare after a decade? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:877–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Scalise JJ, Iannotti JP (2008) Glenohumeral arthrodesis after failed prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:70–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Scalise JJ, Iannotti JP (2009) Glenohumeral arthrodesis after failed prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S et al (2015) National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Schleich C, Bittersohl B, Antoch G et al (2016) Thickness distribution of glenohumeral joint cartilage: a normal value study on asymptomatic volunteers using 3‑tesla magnetic resonance tomography. Cartilage:. doi:10.1177/1947603516651669

    Google Scholar 

  66. Shannon SF, Wagner ER, Houdek MT et al (2016) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: outcomes comparing primary reverse arthroplasty for fracture versus reverse arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1655. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Singh A, Yian EH, Dillon MT et al (2014) The effect of surgeon and hospital volume on shoulder arthroplasty perioperative quality metrics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1187–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Singh JA, Ramachandran R (2015) Does hospital volume predict outcomes and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty in the US? Arthritis Care Res 67:885–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2011) Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008). J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1513–1517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Schleck C et al (2012) Periprosthetic infections after total shoulder arthroplasty: a 33-year perspective. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1534–1541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:388–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Solomon JA, Joseph SM, Shishani Y et al (2016) Cost analysis of hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fractures. Orthopedics 39:230–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Uribe JW, Botto-Van Bemden A (2009) Partial humeral head resurfacing for osteonecrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:711–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Villacis D, Sivasundaram L, Pannell WC et al (2016) Complication rate and implant survival for reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus total shoulder arthroplasty: results during the initial 2 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:927–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A et al (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14:756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’connor DP et al (2007) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg A 89:1476–1485

    Google Scholar 

  77. Weber-Spickschen TS, Alfke D, Agneskirchner JD (2015) The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results. Bone Joint J 97-B:1662–1667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Werner BS, Abdelkawi AF, Boehm D et al (2016) Long-term analysis of revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented long stems. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.015

    Google Scholar 

  79. Young A, Walch G, Boileau P et al (2011) A multicentre study of the long-term results of using a flat-back polyethylene glenoid component in shoulder replacement for primary osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:210–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Young SW, Everts NM, Ball CM et al (2009) The SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:622–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Young SW, Zhu M, Walker CG et al (2013) Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of cuff-tear arthropathy: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:910–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Zarkadas PC, Throckmorton TQ, Dahm DL et al (2011) Patient reported activities after shoulder replacement: total and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J et al (2011) Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kircher.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Kircher übt eine Berater- und Honorartätigkeit für die Firmen Limacorporate SPA und Arthrex aus.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kircher, J. Schulterendoprothetik im Alter. Orthopäde 46, 40–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3365-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3365-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation