Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidenzbasiertes Update aus der Hüftendoprothetik

Evidence-based update in hip arthroplasty

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die vorliegende Arbeit liefert eine Übersicht aktueller evidenzbasierter Daten und neuer, klinisch relevanter Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Hüftendoprothetik. Eine Vielzahl aktueller klinischer Studien beschäftigte sich mit der Tribologie, und hier stehen insbesondere die Metall-Metall-Gleitpaarungen im Blickpunkt. Große Studien aus Prothesenregistern definierten Risikofaktoren für ein frühzeitiges Versagen beim Oberflächenersatz und das Auftreten von Pseudotumoren. Auch neue keramische Gleitpartner wurden in randomisierten Studien untersucht. Neben weiteren interessanten klinischen Studien liegen nun auch große Metaanalysen zur Infektdiagnostik, Antibiotikaprophylaxe, Regionalanästhesie, Thromboembolieprophylaxe, Prothesenfixation, Navigation sowie Komplikationsvermeidung vor, die in der vorliegenden Arbeit zusammengefasst wurden.

Abstract

The present manuscript provides an overview of current evidence-based data and new clinically relevant developments in the field of hip arthroplasty. A multitude of current clinical trials have focussed on tribology with special interest on metal-on-metal implants. Large trials from implant registries have defined specific risk factors for early implant failure and pseudotumors in surface replacement. Furthermore, new ceramic liners and femoral head implants have been investigated in randomized trials. Apart from other very interesting studies, the results of large meta-analyses are now available for laboratory values in periprosthetic infection, antibiotic prophylaxis, regional anesthesia, prevention of thromboembolism, implant fixation, navigation and clinical pathways to prevent complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Al-Buhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A (2008) Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 90(7):915–919

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbieri A, Vanhaecht K, Van Herck P et al (2009) Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis. BMC Med 7:32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann J, Stengel D, Tingart M et al (2009) Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80(5):538–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G et al (2010) Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 92(11):2102–2109

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chevilotte CJ, Trousdale RT, An K-N et al (2010) In vitro analysis of retrieved ceramic implants for squeaking. Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, LA, podium abstract 003

  6. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Montironi F, Pullen C (2008) Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand. Orthopedics 31(10 suppl 1):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooke NJ, Rodgers L, Rawlings D et al (2009) Bone density of the femoral neck following Birmingham hip resurfacing. Acta Orthop 80(6):660–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS et al (2008) Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 90(10):1291–1297

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Steiger RN, Miller LN, Prosser GH et al (2010) Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 81(1):72–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deprez P, Sint-Kruis LVB, Demuynck (2010) High early revision rate due to pseudotumor formation in metal-on-metal large head diameter THA. Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, LA, podium abstract 011

  11. Engh CA Jr, MacDonald SJ, Sritulanondha S et al (2009) 2008 John Charnley Award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):101–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eriksson BI, Kakkar AK, Turpie AG et al (2009) Oral rivaroxaban for the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 91(5):636–644

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gandhi R, Marchie A, Farrokhyar F, Mahomed N (2009) Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33(3):593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN (2009) Hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 24(1):38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV et al (2010) The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):318–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 91(12):1566–1574

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goh SK, Samuel M, Su DH et al (2009) Meta-analysis comparing total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture. J Arthroplasty 24(3):400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grammatopoulos GA, Langton D, Kwon Y-M et al (2010) The role of acetabular component positioning in the development of inflammatory pseudotumors. Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, LA, podium abstract 013

  19. Hall DP, Srikantharajah D, Anakwe RE et al (2009) Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement. Hip Int 19(3):245–250

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Dennis DA et al (2010) THA with delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):358–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hopley C, Stengel D, Ekkernkamp A et al (2010) Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review. BMJ 340:c2332. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu S, Zhang ZY, Hua YQ et al (2009) A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 91(7):935–942

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs JJ, Novak CC (2010) Metal ion levels in maternal and placental blood following metal-on-metal arthroplasty. Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, LA, podium abstract 008

  24. Kagoma YK, Crowther MA, Douketis J et al (2009) Use of antifibrinolytic therapy to reduce transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of randomized trials. Thromb Res 123(5):687–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92(1):38–46

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J et al (2010) The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):326–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindström D, Sadr Azodi O, Wladis A et al (2008) Effects of a perioperative smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 248(5):739–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Seng BE et al (2010) Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):367–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MacDonald SJ, Engh CA, Naudie D et al (2010) Ceramic on metal versus metal on metal clinical and metal ion results of a prospective FDA RCT. Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, LA, podium abstract 005

  30. McBryde CW, Theivendran K, Thomas AM et al (2010) The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 92(1):105–112

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mu Z, Tian J, Wu T et al (2009) A systematic review of radiological outcomes of highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33(3):599–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S (2010) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD001706

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parvizi J, Saleh KJ, Ragland PS et al (2008) Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 79(3):335–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ et al (2010) Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop 81(1):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharrock NE, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Go G et al (2008) Potent anticoagulants are associated with a higher all-cause mortality rate after hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(3):714–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Springer BD, Connelly SE, Odum SM et al (2009) Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 24(6 suppl):2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Bowen AR et al (2010) Early return to function after hip resurfacing: is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 25(5):748–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Roy AG et al (2010) A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3–6 years follow-up. Hip Int 20(1):1–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ward DT, Hansen EN, Takemoto SK et al (2010) Cost and effectiveness of postoperative fever diagnostic evaluation in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 25(6 suppl):43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolowacz SE, Roskell NS, Plumb JM et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 101(1):77–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ziaee H, Daniel J, Pradhan C et al (2010) Placental regulation of metal transfer in patients with metal-metal surface replacement arthroplasty. Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, LA, podium abstract 009

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Gollwitzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gollwitzer, H., Gerdesmeyer, L., Gradinger, R. et al. Evidenzbasiertes Update aus der Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 40, 535–542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-011-1763-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-011-1763-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation