Skip to main content
Log in

Soziales Risiko – geburtshilfliches Risiko?

Social risk – obstetric risk?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Laut Armutsbericht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nehmen Kinder- und Familienarmut kontinuierlich zu. Viele der einzelnen Indikatoren für soziale Benachteiligung haben einen negativen Einfluss auf den Verlauf von Schwangerschaft, Geburt und postpartaler Phase. Daher muss auch in Deutschland mit relevanten gesundheitlichen Problemen für Frauen und Kinder durch soziale Benachteiligung gerechnet werden. Eindeutig belegt ist die Bedeutung sozialer Faktoren insbesondere für die Rate von Frühgeburt und intrauteriner Wachstumsretardierung sowie für die Entstehung einer postpartalen Depression. Für die Praxis ist bedeutsam zu erkennen, dass soziale Faktoren ein relevantes Risiko in der Geburtshilfe in Deutschland darstellen. Bei der Betreuung von Schwangeren sollten eine Abschätzung sozialer Problematiken, potentielle Interventionen, aber auch präventive Maßnahmen verstärkt berücksichtigt werden.

Abstract

According to the report on poverty in young people in Germany the number of children in poor families is continually growing. Many of the single indicators for social inequality have major adverse effects on pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period. Therefore, it is clear that even in Germany relevant health issues for women and children are linked to social inequality. The impact of social factors in particular on the rate of preterm delivery, low birth weight and postnatal depression is well known. Socioeconomic factors are a relevant health risk in Germany and should not be neglected. Preventive strategies, an effective assessment of the social situation and social interventions are essential parts of perinatal care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. ACOG (2006) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 343: Psychosocial risk factors: perinatal screening and intervention. Obstet Gynecol 108:469–477

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali SM, Lindstrom M (2006) Socioeconomic, psychosocial, behavioural and psychological determinants of BMI among young women: differing patterns for underweight and overweight/ obesity. Eur J Public Health 16:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilszta JL, Tang M, Meyer D et al (2008) Single motherhood versus poor partner relationship: outcomes for antenatal mental health. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 42:52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke OG, Anderson HR, Bland JM et al (1989) Effects on birth weight of smoking, alcohol, caffeine, socioeconomic factors and psychosocial stress. BMJ 298:795–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang G, McNamara TK, Orav EJ et al (2005) Brief intervention for prenatal alcohol use: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 105:991–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. David M, Pachaly J, Vetter K (2006) Perinatal outcome in Berlin (Germany) among immigrants from Turkey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dole N, Savitz DA, Hertz-Picciotto I et al (2003) Maternal stress and preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 157:14–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois L, Girard M (2003) Social determinants of initiation, duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding at the population level: the results of the Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Quebec (ELDEQ 1998-2002). Can J Public Health 94:300–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Floyd RL, O’Connor MJ, Sokol RJ et al (2005) Recognition and prevention of fetal alcohol syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 106:1059–1064

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Forrest JD (1994) Epidemiology of unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1485–1489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gennaro S (2005) Overview of current state of research on pregnancy outcomes in minority populations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:S3–S10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Göransson M, Faxelid E, Heilig M (2004) Beliefs and reality: detection and prevention of high alcohol consumption in Swedish antenatal clinics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:796–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Groeben N, Hurrelmann B (Hrsg) (2002) Medienkompetenz: Voraussetzungen, Dimensionen, Funktionen. Juventa (Weinheim)

  14. Halbreich U (2005) The association between pregnancy processes, preterm delivery, low birth weight and postpartum depressions – The need for interdisciplinary integration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1312–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harville EW, Savitz DA, Dole N et al (2007) Psychological and biological markers of stress and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. BJOG 114:216–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Sabroe S, Secher NJ (1993) Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. BMJ 307:234–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hilier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA et al (1995) Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. N Engl J Med 333:1737–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hobel CJ, Goldstein A, Barrett E (2008) Psychosocial stress and pregnancy outcome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 51:333–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmes TH, Rahe RH (1967) Holmes-Rahe life changes scale. J Psychosom Res 11:213–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Janssen A, Holt VL, Sugg N et al (2005) Intimate partner violence and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1341–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuczkowski KM (2007) The effects of drug abuse on pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:578–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kupek E, Petrou S, Vause S, Maresh M (2002) Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. BJOG 109:265–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lacroix R, Eason E, Melzack R (2000) Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: A prospective study of its frequency, intensity and patterns af change. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:931–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ny P, Dykes AK, Molin J, Dejin-Karlsson E (2007) Utilisation of antenatal care by country of birth in a multi-ethnic population: a four-year community-based study in Malmö, Sweden, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:805–813

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson E, Malmström M, Johansson SE (2005) Do foreign-born women in Sweden have an increased risk of non-normal childbirth? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:825–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodrigues T, Barros H (2008) Maternal unemployment: an indicator of spontaneous preterm delivery risk. Eur J Epidemiol 23:689–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scholl TO, Hediger ML, Huang J et al (1992) Young maternal age and parity. Influence on pregnancy outcome. Ann Epidemiol 2:565–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Siega-Riz AM, Siega-Riz AM, Laraia B (2006) The implications of maternal overweight and obesity on the course of pregnancy and birth outcomes. Matern Child Health J 10:S153–S156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vester M, v. Oerzen P (1993) Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung. Bund, Köln

  30. Weck RL, Tessie P, Flaws JA (2008) Impact of environmental factors and poverty on pregnancy outcomes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 51:349–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wijma K, Samelius L, Wingren G, Wijma B (2007) The association between ill-health and abuse: a cross-sectional population based study. Scand J Psychol 48:567–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitfield K, Weidner G, Clark R, Anderson N (2002) Sociodemographic diversity and behavioral medicine. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:463–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiong X, Harville EW, Mattison DR et al (2008) Exposure to hurricane katrina, post-traumatic stress disorder and birth outcomes. Am J Med Sci 336:111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang J, Carmichael SL, Canfield M et al (2008) Socioeconomic status in relation to selected birth defects in a large multicentered US case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 167:145–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeitlin JA, Ancel PY, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Papiernik E (2001) Are risk factors the same for small for gestational age versus other preterm births? Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:208–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Die korrespondierende Autorin gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Goeckenjan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goeckenjan, M., Ramsauer, B., Hänel, M. et al. Soziales Risiko – geburtshilfliches Risiko?. Gynäkologe 42, 102–110 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-008-2258-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-008-2258-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation