Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Perinatal outcome in Berlin (Germany) among immigrants from Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Are there differences regarding important perinatal outcome-parameters in Berlin relating to ethnicity? Patients and methods A database was available covering 152,193 single deliveries in all hospitals in Berlin/Germany in the period 1993–1999, including 132,555 German women and 19,638 women of other ethnicities. Comparisons were made between a total of four pairs of sub-groups matched in terms of parity and social status (significance level P < 0.01). Results Pregnant migrants come for their first antenatal check-up significantly later, thus delaying the initiation of necessary diagnostic or therapeutic measures. Migrants show higher rates of prepartal and also postpartal anemia than the German women. In all sub-groups the German women had a significantly higher frequency of planned cesarean sections. Migrants were significantly less likely to receive an epidural anesthesia during delivery. It is also noticeable that the rate of congenital malformations of neonates is significantly higher in the migrant collectives. Conclusions Important perinatal quality parameters such as infant and maternal mortality and rates of premature delivery have largely converged between German and Turkish migrant mothers. The differences found (e.g., rates of planned cesarean section, epidural anesthesia, or anemia) could be interpreted as indications of persistent differences in quality of care for migrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aveyard P, Cheng KK, Manaseki S, Gardosi J (2002) The risk of preterm delivery in women from different ethnic groups. BJOG 109:894–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Braveman P, Egerter S, Edmonston F, Verdon M (1995) Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery in California. Am J Public Health 5:625–630

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chan A, Roder D, Marchaper T (1988) Obstetric profiles of immigrant women from non-English-speaking countries in South Australia, 1981–1983. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 28:90–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins JW, David RJ (2004) Pregnancy outcome of Mexican-American women: the effect of generational residence in the United States. Ethn Dis 14:317–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Diani F, Zanconato G, Foschi F, Turinetto A, Franchi M (2003) Management of the pregnant immigrant woman in the decade 1992–2001. J Obstet Gynaecol 23:615–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Endl J, Tatra G (1974) Geburtshilfliche Aspekte bei Gastarbeiterinnen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 86:102–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Essén B, Bödker B, Sjöberg NO, Langhoff-Roos J, Greisen G, Gudmundsson S, Östergren PO (2002) Are some perinatal deaths in immigrant groups linked to suboptimal perinatal care services? BJOG 109:677–682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibison JM (2005) Ethnicity and mode of delivery in ‘low–risk’ first-time mothers, East London, 1988–1997. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 118:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Barbaresi WJ, Schaid DJ, Jacobsen SJ (1986) Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies. Mayo Clin Proc 73:1053–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leslie JC, Galvin SL, Diehl SJ, Bennett TA, Buescher PA (2003) Infant mortality, low birth weight, and prematurity among Hispanic, white, and African American in North Carolina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1238–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mac F, Knudsen LB (1989) Abnormalities among newborn children born to immigrants in Denmark in the period 1983–1987. Ugeskr Laeger 151:1101–1106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McGlade MS, Saha S, Dahlstrom ME (2004) The Latina paradox: an opportunity for restructuring prenatal care delivery. Am J Public Health 94:2062–2065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oeter K, Collatz J, Hecker H, Rohde JJ (1979) Werden die präventiven Möglichkeiten der Schwangerenvorsorge ausreichend genutzt? Erste Ergebnisse der Perinatalstudie Hannover. Gynäkologe 12:164–174

    Google Scholar 

  14. Page RL (2004) Positive pregnancy outcomes in Mexican immigrants: what can we learn? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 33:783–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel R, Steer P, Doyle P, Little MP, Elliott P (2004) Does gestation vary by ethnic group? A London-based study of over 122,000 pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour. Int J Epidemiol 33:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rimbach E (1967) Schwangerschaften und Geburten bei Ausländerinnen. Arch Gynecol 204:293–295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rizzo N, Ciardelli V, Gandolfi Colleoni G, Bonavita B, Parisio C, Farina A, Bovicelli L (2004) Delivery and immigration: the experience of an Italian hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116:170–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rust G, Nembhard WN, Nichols M, Omole F, Minor P, Barosso G, Mayberry R (2004) Racial and ethnic disparities in the provision of epidural analgesia to Georgia Medicaid beneficiaries during labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:456–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Salihu HM, Kinniburgh BA, Aliyu MH, Kirby TS, Alexander GR (2004) Racial disparity in stillbirth among singleton, twin and triplet gestations in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 104:734–740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saurwein A (1969) Entbindungen bei Ausländerinnen, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frequenz und Indikationsstellung der abdominalen Schnittentbindung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 29:728–734

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schwoerer P, Schmahl FW (2003) Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerenvorsorge—ein Spiegel gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen und Aspekte der Effizienz. Untersuchungen auf der Basis der Perinatalerhebung Baden-Württemberg 1998–2001. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 61:538–545

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stoltenberg C, Magnus P, Lie RT, Daltveit AK, Irgens LM (1997) Birth defects and parental consanguinity in Norway. Am J Epidemiol 145:439–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vangen S, Stoltenberg C, Stray-Pedersen B (1999) Complaints and complications in pregnancy: a study of ethnic Norwegian and ethnic Pakistani women in Oslo. Ethn Health 4:19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vangen S, Stoltenberg C, Skrondal A, Magnus P, Stray-Pedersen B (2000) Cesarean section among immigrants in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:553–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vangen S, Stoltenberg C, Elise R, Sundby J, Stray-Pedersen B (2002) Perinatal complications among ethnic Somalis in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:317–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waldmann A (2004) Dietary iron intake and iron status of German female vegans: results of the German Vegan Study. Ann Nutr Metab 48:103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoong W, Wagley A, Fong C, Chukwuma C, Nauta M (2004) Obstetric performance of ethnic Kosovo Albanian asylum seekers in London: a case–control study. J Obstet Gynaecol 24:510–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeitlin J, Bucourt M, Rivera L, Topuz B, Papiernik E (2004) Preterm birth and maternal country of birth in a French district with a multiethnic population. BJOG 111:849–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Matthias David & Jürgen Pachaly

  2. Vivantes-Klinikum Neukölln, Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Berlin, Germany

    Klaus Vetter

Authors
  1. Matthias David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Pachaly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Klaus Vetter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias David.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

David, M., Pachaly, J. & Vetter, K. Perinatal outcome in Berlin (Germany) among immigrants from Turkey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274, 271–278 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0182-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0182-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation