Abstract
Mercury (Hg) and stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios were analysed in body feathers from nestlings of white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) (WTE; n = 13) and Northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) (NG; n = 8) and in red blood cells (RBC) from NG (n = 11) from Norway. According to linear mixed model, species factor was significant in explaining the Hg concentration in feathers (LMM; p < 0.001, estimate (WTE) = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.26, 3.76), with concentrations higher in WTE (3.01 ± 1.34 µg g−1 dry weight) than in NG (0.51 ± 0.34 µg g−1 dry weight). This difference and the isotopic patterns for each species, likely reflect their diet, as WTE predominantly feed on a marine and higher trophic-chain diet compared to the terrestrial NG. In addition, Hg concentrations in RBCs of NG nestlings were positively correlated with feather Hg concentrations (Rho = 0.77, p = 0.03), supporting the potential usefulness of nestling body feathers to biomonitor and estimate Hg exposure. Hg levels in both species were generally below the commonly applied toxicity threshold of 5 µg g−1 in feathers, although exceeded in two WTE (6.08 and 5.19 µg g−1 dry weight).
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Mercury (Hg) is considered a global contaminant and a threat to human and environmental health, which has led to implementation of legislative measures to reduce its emissions at global and local scale (Climate and Pollution Agency 2010; UNEP 2013, 2021). The effectiveness of such restrictions and the current exposure concentrations in the environment can be assessed by biomonitoring using birds of prey (Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2014). In this sense, feathers are considered a good tool because most of the total Hg body burden (typically 70%–90%) is remobilised and sequestered into the growing feathers (Furness et al. 1986; Espín et al. 2016) which themselves reflect dietary Hg in chicks (Rattner et al. 2008; Lodenius and Solonen 2013; Ekblad et al. 2021). In the case of nestlings of territorial and non-migratory species, the information about local contamination status is even more accurate, as these are usually fed with prey caught close to the nest (Frank and Lutz 1999). While feathers integrate exposure during their growth, blood provides a non-destructive measure of recent contaminant exposure (Espín et al. 2014a, 2016).
To study dietary habits, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stable isotopes (SIs) are often considered as a better time-integrated approach than conventional use of pellets, regurgitates or stomach contents (Inger and Bearhop 2008). Moreover, when chick feathers are used, there is no or little temporal mismatch between SIs and Hg (Bond 2010; Carravieri et al. 2014).While δ13C is used to identify sources of C (i.e. marine, terrestrial, etc.), δ15N is very useful to assess trophic position in dietary studies and bioaccumulation of contaminants (Inger and Bearhop 2008). This approach has also been used in the field of ecotoxicology to investigate sources of pollutants (Ramos and González-Solís 2012; Eulaers et al. 2013, 2014; Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2017; Badry et al. 2019).
Our objective was to compare the exposure to Hg in nestling white-tailed eagles (WTE) (Haliaeetus albicilla), a marine top predator, and nestling Northern goshawks (NG) (Accipiter gentilis), a terrestrial bird-eating predator. Both species are resident in Northern Norway and have been part of ongoing biomonitoring of which this study is part. In addition, we aimed to relate Hg exposure to diet as proxied by stable C (δ13C) and N isotopes (δ15N) in body feathers and discuss the associated toxicological risk.
Materials and methods
Samples were obtained in 2014 from two locations in Northern Norway (Nordland county: N 68.30–68.47°, E 24.54–25.27° and Troms and Finnmark county: N 68.77–67.39°, E 20.39–23.34° respectively). To our knowledge, there are no significant local sources of Hg pollution in the area (Dolan et al. 2017). When fledglings were at similar stages of feather development (NG were 18–26 days old and WTE were 35–56 days old (methods described in Gómez-Ramírez et al. (2017)), about 10 feathers from chest and back of each bird were gently plucked and kept in plastic bags at room temperature until analysis. At the same time, blood samples (1–4 mL) from NG were obtained by puncturing the brachial vein with a 23G needle and a heparin-coated syringe. Samples were transported refrigerated to the laboratory, where they were centrifuged at 5000 g for 10 min and plasma and RBCs were transferred into separate tubes and frozen at − 20°C until analysis (Espín et al. 2021). Sampling was approved by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; 2014/58808-2).
Total Hg (henceforth Hg) was analysed in feathers from 13 WTE (from 9 nests) and 8 NG (from 3 nests) and RBCs from 11 NG (from 4 nests) at the Laboratory of Toxicology, University of Murcia (Spain) using a Milestone DMA-80 direct Hg analyser, by combustion-amalgamation atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mercury in RBC and feathers of NG was measured in the same individuals, but due to the lack of samples, feathers of some nestlings could not be analysed. Following the method described by Espín et al. (2014a), one body feather (0.02–0.08 g dry weight; dw) was washed twice with distilled water, dried at room temperature, cut with scissors and loaded in a nickel boat for analysis. Hg was measured in RBC instead of whole blood as the samples had been centrifuged to obtain plasma for another study and plasma is not a recommended matrix to analyse Hg (see Espín et al. 2021), as most MeHg is bound to erythrocytes. In addition, analysis of total Hg in RBC is considered a suitable proxy of recent MeHg exposure (Berglund et al. 2005). Hence, RBC samples from NG were loaded in nickel boats (ca. 0.1 g, wet weight; ww) and analysed using the same technique. The calibration curve was traced with ten points in duplicate 0–1004 ng). The method was tested using certified reference material (CRM) (Hg Standard for AAS, Fluka, 1000 mg L−1 Hg in 12% nitric acid, prepared with high purity Hg metal, HNO3- Trace SELECT® and water Trace SELECT® Ultra) (mean recovery of 5 replicates 104.2% and coefficient of variation for repeatability 11.4%). The limit of detection was 0.005 ng. Blanks were included every 10 samples. Periodically, certified reference material (CRM; TORT-2, lobster hepatopancreas, National Research Council Canada) was analysed in duplicates for testing precision and accuracy of the method, obtaining a recovery percentage of total Hg of 108.14% ± 4.1% (mean ± standard deviation) and repeatability 3.7% from 7 replicates of CRM diluted to 1 ppm. To compare Hg in blood with other studies, values in RBCs were transformed using average values of haematocrit in NG nestlings from Norway (41.39%, Briels et al., unpublished data) and density of 1.1 g mL−1 for blood pellets (Ortiz-Santaliestra et al. 2015).
Feather barbs were washed with ultrapure water, dried at room temperature, cut with scissors (< 1 mm pieces) and loaded into tin cups for analysis of stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotopes at the Laboratory of Oceanology at the University of Liège (Belgium), using continuous flow elemental analysis isotope ratio mass spectrometry with a Vario MICRO cube elemental analyser (Elementar Analysensysteme GmBH, Hanau, Germany) coupled to an IsoPrime100 mass spectrometer (Isoprime, Cheadle, United Kingdom). Sucrose (IAEA-C6, δ13C, mean ± SD = − 10.8 ± 0.5‰) and ammonium sulphate (IAEA-N2, δ15N mean ± SD = + 20.3 ± 0.2‰) were used as CRM and were calibrated against the international isotopic references. Standard deviations on multi-batch replicate measurements of lab standards (fish tissues) analysed interspersed among the samples (2 lab standards for 15 samples) were 0.1 and 0.3 ‰ for δ13C and δ15N.
To test differences between species in feather Hg, we used linear mixed models (LMMs; Bolker 2015). To avoid pseudoreplication, all models included nest as a random factor. To assess whether the model containing species performed better in predicting feather Hg concentrations, we compared the log likelihood with the null model using ANOVA (Burnham and Anderson, 2002). Correlations between the variables (δ13C and δ15N in feathers, Hg in feathers and in RBCs from NG) were assessed using Spearman (Rho) correlation tests. LMMs were also used to assess the relationship between δ13C and δ15N isotopes and Hg in feathers, again including nest as a random factor and comparing the log likelihood with the null model using ANOVA. If the species model performed significantly better than the null model, we ran the models separately by species, but if not, they were run together in a single model including species as a factor. We analysed both univariate models and models that included the two isotopes together. Before including the two isotopes in the model, the variance influence factor (VIF) was checked for multicollinearity between isotopes (Dormann et al. 2013). Models were run only with two isotopes if found VIF < 6. In all cases, the log-likelihood was compared with the null model using ANOVA. All data analyses were performed using the R statistical software (R Core team 202 0) and SPSS v. 25. All tests were two-tailed, and the level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Values were shown as mean ± SD (median; range) and estimates from the LMMs were shown as mean and 95% confidence intervals.
Results
Hg was found in all the feather samples and concentrations (dry weight) were 0.51 ± 0.34 (0.50; 0.16–1.01) µg g−1 in NG and 3.01 ± 1.34 (2.62; 1.66–6.08) µg g−1 in WTE. The LMM showed that the species factor was significant in explaining the Hg concentration in feathers (LMM; p < 0.001, estimate (WTE) = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.26, 3.76). WTE had higher feather concentrations than NG (Fig. 1). RBC Hg concentrations in NG were 0.03 ± 0.01 (0.03; 0.02–0.05) µg g−1 ww. LMM found no relationship for Hg concentration in the feather with RBC Hg (log-likelihood = 3.23, p = 0.28, estimate = − 0.01; 95% CI = − 0.02, 0.00).
Hg concentrations in RBCs of NG nestlings were positively correlated with feather Hg concentrations (Rho = 0.77, p = 0.03; Fig. 2).
As previously reported (Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2017), SIs values in the feathers differed between the species, with δ13C and δ15N body feather values higher in WTE than in NG (Fig. 3). Values of SIs per sampled species in relation to feather Hg concentrations are represented in Fig. 3.
Linear mixed models showed no significant relationship between SIs and Hg in the NG nestling body feathers (LMM δ13C, log-likelihood = 2.83, p = 0.55, estimate = 0.06, 95% CI = − 0.18, 0.31; LMM δ15N, log-likelihood = 3.12, p = 0.33, estimate = 0.04, 95% CI = − 0.07, 0.16), nor for WTE nestling body feathers (LMM δ13C, log-likelihood = − 21.74, p = 0.24, estimate = − 0.59, 95% CI = − 1.65, 0.47; LMM δ15N, log-likelihood = − 20.44, p = 0.107, estimate = 1.56, 95% CI = − 0.22, 3.36). The models including the two isotopes were not shown to perform significantly better than the null model in NG (LMM, log-likelihood = 3.12, p = 0.24), but were nearly significant for WTE (LMM, log-likelihood = − 19.16, p = 0.07). However, when Spearman correlations between SIs and Hg were tested, these were positive and significant for both δ13C (Rho = 0.69, p = 0.047) and δ15N (Rho = 0.71, p = 0.037) in the NG nestling body feathers, but not so in the WTE (δ13C Rho = − 0.19, p = 0.51; δ15N Rho = 0.39, p = 0.19).
Discussion
Blood Hg resulted as 0.015 ± 0.005 (0.014; 0.009–0.024) µg mL−1 ww. These levels were very similar to NG nestlings born in 2015 in the same study area and in a non-polluted area in South-eastern Spain but much lower than in nestlings from a more urbanised and agricultural area in central Norway (Dolan et al. 2017, Table 1).
Hg in feathers of NG were in the range of nestlings of the same species in Norway and Spain (Dolan et al. 2017), but also in other terrestrial diurnal birds of prey of similar diets from USA, Spain and different owl species from Finland and Spain (see Table 1), but lower than the Finnish NG (Solonen and Lodenius 1990) or Norway (see Table 1). In WTE, similar concentrations were found in nestling feathers of osprey (Pandion haliaetus) from different places in USA, Canada and Finland (see Table 1) and in peregrine falcons fledglings feeding on aquatic birds from Lake Mead National Recreation Area in USA (Barnes and Gerstenberger 2015).
In our study, only one feather per individual could be analysed, as the rest were used for other analyses (Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2017). There seems to be some controversy in this regard, as according to some authors (Peterson et al. 2019), to avoid intra-individual variations, several grown feathers should be used, while other studies reported very small differences among individual feathers (Roque et al. 2016; Ekblad et al. 2021). Nevertheless, the positive and significant relationship between feather and blood concentrations of Hg in NG, also found in other studies on nestlings (Dolan et al. 2017; Espín et al. 2014a), supports the usefulness of body feathers to biomonitor and estimate Hg exposure.
Emissions of Hg in Norway have been significantly reduced since 2007, due to restrictions and improvements in waste treatments (Climate and Pollution Agency 2010). However, this metal was quantified in all the samples analysed. This is in line with its well-known ubiquity and long range transport (UNEP 2013) and the bioaccumulation and biomagnification potential of MeHg, through the food chain. WTE feathers from adult birds showed a decrease in Hg from the 1960s to 2015 in the Norwegian population (Sun et al. 2019). Similarly, a trend study in moss between 1995–2000 showed a general decline in the whole country (Harmens et al. 2008). On the contrary, feathers of female tawny owls from central Norway showed no temporal trend between 1986–2005 (Bustnes et al. 2013). Although our results only provide a snapshot on exposure in 2014, these can be used as a baseline in future studies to assess temporal trends.
SIs have been used to relate contaminant exposure to dietary sources (Inger and Bearhop 2008). However, its utility in feathers has been discussed, mainly based on the statement that contaminants (especially Hg) and SIs are integrated into feathers over different time periods, which results in spurious relationships with no biological meaning (Bond 2010). However, unlike in adult feathers, this utility seems to be clear in the case of body feathers from nestlings, as strong correlations are usually found in different species including seabirds, ardeids and eagles (Rodríguez et al. 2013; Einoder et al. 2018; Cherel et al. 2018; Badry et al. 2019). In agreement with similar studies on WTE and NG from the same study areas (Eulaers et al. 2013; Løseth et al. 2019) as well as general expectations (Inger and Bearhop 2008), the SIs results show the dependence on two different ecosystems of the two investigated species. While NG δ13C values fall within the expected range for terrestrial birds (mean ± SD: − 22.9% ± 2.6%), those for WTE are as to be expected for a carnivorous predominantly marine species (mean ± SD: − 18.8 % ± 2.2%), (Kelly 2000), and in fact two different stable isotope niches that do not overlap (Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2017). This differentiation in dietary ecology is reflected in significant differences in Hg concentrations between species and echoes earlier observations of the marine environment presenting higher contaminant accumulation (Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2017). However, correlations between Hg and δ13C followed different patterns in each species. The positive correlations in both feather and blood from NG suggest marine dietary input. The negative correlation in WTE is suggested to be related to freshwater or terrestrial food sources (Boutton 1991). In this case, the proximity to coast and therefore, to anthropogenic sources may be the cause of higher levels, as already suggested for perfluorinated flame retardants (Gómez-Ramírez et al. 2017).
The positive correlations between Hg and δ15N values are indicative of biomagnification through the food chain, as already reported in both terrestrial and marine species (Bearhop et al. 2000; Eulaers et al. 2013). In fact, the samples with the highest concentrations (6.08 and 5.19 µg g−1 dw,), belonging to WTE, also showed high δ15N (14.43 and 14.79%, respectively). Despite this, and probably due to the small sample size, we found no significant relationship between SIs and Hg in feathers. The lack of significance can also be due to a low variability of trophic levels in their prey items (Góngora et al. 2018). Nevertheless, the trophic level of both species could not be compared because prey items were not analysed.
Field and laboratory studies have shown alterations after exposure to Hg in birds, such as hepatotoxicity, immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption and developmental toxicity, including suppression of baseline corticosterone (Herring et al. 2012). The threshold level for sub-lethal effects has been suggested at 5 µg g−1 dw Hg in feathers (Eisler 1987; Burger and Gochfeld 1997). In contrast, Sun et al. (2019), based on reproductive and toxicity symptoms, proposed a safe level in WTE at 40 µg g−1 dw in feathers, well above any of the concentrations found in the current study. Only two WTE from different nests showed feather Hg concentrations just above the 5 µg g−1 dw threshold (6.08 and 5.19 µg g−1 dw, see Fig. 1). However, studies in eagle owl nestlings suggested that lower Hg feather concentrations (0.32 µg g−1 dw, close to our results in NG feathers) may alter antioxidant enzymes and increase lipid peroxidation in RBCs (Espín et al. 2014a, b). Although effects at the biochemical level in these individuals cannot be excluded without further investigation of sub-lethal effects, the estimated blood Hg concentrations are below 0.03 µg mL−1 ww, the level associated to increased concentrations of superoxide dismutase and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in eagle owls (Espín et al. 2014a, b). However, susceptibility to Hg is very variable within and among species, and the toxic levels vary for different endpoints (e.g. hatching, deformities, cognitive effects). For further risk assessment, increased sample sizes and analysis of selenium (Se) in feathers is recommended, as the interaction of both metals has been related to a decreased Hg toxicity. The assessment of Se:Hg molar ratios may provide additional information about the potential toxicity of Hg (Burger et al. 2013).
Concentrations of Hg are within the range of background contamination levels for birds. According to the SIs analyses, variation and inter-specific differences in Hg levels seem to be related to dietary plasticity. Although the concentrations of Hg are mostly below the suggested safe levels for other birds of prey, further studies regarding sub-lethal effects with larger sample sizes and including the ratio Se–Hg are recommended (Burger et al. 2013). This study provides baseline data to be compared with future biomonitoring studies using blood and feathers from birds of prey in Northern Norway.
References
Badry A, Palma L, Beja P et al (2019) Using an apex predator for large-scale monitoring of trace element contamination: associations with environmental, anthropogenic and dietary proxies. Sci Total Environ 676:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.217
Barnes JG, Gerstenberger SL (2015) Using feathers to determine mercury contamination in peregrine falcons and their prey. J Raptor Res 49:43–58. https://doi.org/10.3356/jrr-14-00045.1
Bearhop S, Waldron S, Thompson D, Furness R (2000) Bioamplification of mercury in great Skua Catharacta skua Chicks: the influence of trophic status as determined by stable isotope signatures of blood and feathers. Mar Pollut Bull 40:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00205-2
Berglund M, Lind B, Björnberg KA et al (2005) Inter-individual variations of human mercury exposure biomarkers: a cross-sectional assessment. Environ Heal A Glob Access Sci Source. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-4-20
Bond AL (2010) Relationships between stable isotopes and metal contaminants in feathers are spurious and biologically uninformative. Environ Pollut 158:1182–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.004
Boutton TW (1991) Stable carbon isotope ratios of natural materials: II. Atmospheric, terrestrial, marine, and freshwater environments. In: Coleman DC, Fry B (eds) Carbon isotope techniques. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, pp 173–183
Burger J, Gochfeld M (1997) Risk, mercury levels, and birds: relating adverse laboratory effects to field biomonitoring. Environ Res 75:160–172. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1997.3778
Burger J, Jehl JR, Gochfeld M (2013) Selenium:mercury molar ratio in eared grebes (Podiceps nigricollis) as a possible biomarker of exposure. Ecol Indic 34:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.04.001
Bustnes JO, Bårdsen B-JJ, Bangjord G et al (2013) Temporal trends (1986–2005) of essential and non-essential elements in a terrestrial raptor in northern Europe. Sci Total Environ 458–460:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.027
Carravieri A, Cherel Y, Blévin P et al (2014) Mercury exposure in a large subantarctic avian community. Environ Pollut 190:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.03.017
Cherel Y, Barbraud C, Lahournat M et al (2018) Accumulate or eliminate? Seasonal mercury dynamics in albatrosses, the most contaminated family of birds. Environ Pollut 241:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.048
Climate and Pollution Agency (2010) The mercury problem: reducing and eliminating mercury pollution in Norway. Retrieved from http://www.mercury.org.cn/zcfg/gj/202107/P020210715338600571869.pdf
Dolan KJ, Ciesielski TM, Lierhagen S et al (2017) Trace element concentrations in feathers and blood of Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) nestlings from Norway and Spain. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 144:564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.062
Einoder LD, MacLeod CK, Coughanowr C (2018) Metal and isotope analysis of bird feathers in a contaminated estuary reveals bioaccumulation, biomagnification, and potential toxic effects. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-018-0532-z
Eisler R (1987) Mercury hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Biological Report 85 (1.10) Contaminant Hazard Review, No. 10. US Fish and Wildlife Research centre
Ekblad C, Eulaers I, Schulz R et al (2021) Spatial and dietary sources of elevated mercury exposure in white-tailed eagle nestlings in an Arctic freshwater environment. Environ Pollut 290:117952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117952
Espín S, Martínez-López E, León-Ortega M et al (2014a) Factors that influence mercury concentrations in nestling Eagle Owls (Bubo bubo). Sci Total Environ 470–471:1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.063
Espín S, Martínez-López E, León-Ortega M et al (2014b) Oxidative stress biomarkers in Eurasian eagle owls (Bubo bubo) in three different scenarios of heavy metal exposure. Environ Res 131:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.015
Espín S, García-Fernández AJJ, Herzke D et al (2016) Tracking pan-continental trends in environmental contamination using sentinel raptors-what types of samples should we use? Ecotoxicology 25:777–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1636-8
Espín S, Andevski J, Duke G et al (2021) A schematic sampling protocol for contaminant monitoring in raptors. Ambio 50:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01341-9
Eulaers I, Jaspers VLB, Bustnes JO et al (2013) Ecological and spatial factors drive intra- and interspecific variation in exposure of subarctic predatory bird nestlings to persistent organic pollutants. Environ Int 57–58:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.03.009
Eulaers I, Jaspers VLB, Halley DJ et al (2014) Brominated and phosphorus flame retardants in white-tailed eagle Haliaeetus albicilla nestlings: bioaccumulation and associations with dietary proxies (δ13C, δ15N and δ34S). Sci Total Environ 478:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.051
Frank RA, Lutz RS (1999) Productivity and survival of Great horned owls exposed to dieldrin. Condor 101:331–339
Furness RW, Muirhead SJ, Woodburn M (1986) Using bird feathers to measure mercury in the environment: relationships between mercury content and moult. Mar Pollut Bull 17:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(86)90801-5
Gómez-Ramírez P, Shore RF, van den Brink NW et al (2014) An overview of existing raptor contaminant monitoring activities in Europe. Environ Int 67:12–21
Gómez-Ramírez P, Bustnes JO, Eulaers I et al (2017) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in plasma and feathers of nestling birds of prey from northern Norway. Environ Res 158:277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.019
Góngora E, Braune BM, Elliott KH (2018) Nitrogen and sulfur isotopes predict variation in mercury levels in Arctic seabird prey. Mar Pollut Bull 135:907–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.075
Guigueno MF, Elliott KH, Levac J, et al (2012) Differential exposure of alpine ospreys to mercury: melting glaciers, hydrology or deposition patterns? Environ Int 40:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.11.004
Harmens H, Norris DA, Koerber GR et al (2008) Temporal trends (1990–2000) in the concentration of cadmium, lead and mercury in mosses across Europe. Environ Pollut 151:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.043
Herring G, Ackerman JT, Herzog MP (2012) Mercury exposure may suppress baseline corticosterone levels in juvenile birds. Environ Sci Technol 46:6339–6346. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300668c
Inger R, Bearhop S (2008) Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis (lond 1859) 150:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00839.x
Kelly JF (2000) Stable isotopes of carbon and in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Can J Zool 78:1–27
Keyel ER, Etterson MA, Niemi GJ, et al (2020) Feather mercury increases with feeding at higher trophic levels in two species of migrant raptors, Merlin (Falco columbarius) and Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus). Condor 122:duz069. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duz069
Lodenius M, Solonen T (2013) The use of feathers of birds of prey as indicators of metal pollution. Ecotoxicology 22:1319–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1128-z
Løseth ME, Briels N, Eulaers I et al (2019) Plasma concentrations of organohalogenated contaminants in white-tailed eagle nestlings–the role of age and diet. Environ Pollut 246:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.028
Peterson SH, Ackerman JT, Toney M, Herzog MP (2019) Mercury concentrations vary within and among individual bird feathers: a critical evaluation and guidelines for feather use in mercury monitoring programs. Environ Toxicol Chem 38:1164–1187
Ramos R, González-Solís J (2012) Trace me if you can: the use of intrinsic biogeochemical markers in marine top predators. Front Ecol Environ 10:258–266. https://doi.org/10.1890/110140
Rattner BA, Golden NH, Toschik PC et al (2008) Concentrations of metals in blood and feathers of nestling ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-007-9004-6
Rodríguez A, Acosta M, Mugica L et al (2013) Assessment of trace elements and stable isotopes of three ardeid species at Birama Swamp Cuba. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9887-3
Roque I, Lourenço R, Marques A et al (2016) Barn owl feathers as biomonitors of mercury: sources of variation in sampling procedures. Ecotoxicology 25:469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1604-8
Solonen T, Lodenius M (1990) Feathers of birds of prey as indicators of mercury contamination in southern Finland. Holarct Ecol 13:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1990.tb00613.x
Sun J, Bustnes JO, Helander B et al (2019) Temporal trends of mercury differ across three northern white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) subpopulations. Sci Total Environ 687:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.027
UNEP (2013) Global mercury assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases, and environmental transport. UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland
UNEP (2021) Minamata convention on mercury. https://www.mercuryconvention.org/en. Accessed 3 Apr 2022
Acknowledgements
In loving memory of Silvia Espín and Richard F. Shore.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. P. Gómez-Ramírez was supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway through the EEA Financial Mechanism, operated by Universidad Complutense de Madrid. The Norwegian Research Council and NTNU funded the project NEWRAPTOR and V.L.B. Jaspers. Additional funding was provided by the Hazardous Substances Flagship (the Raptor project) at the Fram Centre in Tromsø. Hg analysis was supported by the Service of Toxicology and Forensic Veterinary at the University of Murcia. Silvia Espín and Juan M. Pérez-García were supported by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación contracts IJCI-2017–34653 and IJC-2019–038968, respectively).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
“The authors declare no conflict of interest.” “The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results”. The sampling was approved by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; 2014/58808–2).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gómez-Ramírez, P., Bustnes, J.O., Eulaers, I. et al. Mercury Exposure in Birds of Prey from Norway: Relation to Stable Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Signatures in Body Feathers. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 110, 100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-023-03740-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-023-03740-6