Advertisement

Evaluation of the Persistence and Leaching Behaviour of Thiram Fungicide in Soil, Water and Oil Palm Leaves

  • Zainol Maznah
  • Muhamad Halimah
  • B. Sahid Ismail
Article

Abstract

The residual levels and persistence of thiram in the soil, water and oil palm seedling leaves were investigated under field conditions. The experimental plots were carried out on a clay loam soil and applied with three treatments namely; manufacturer’s recommended dosage (25.6 g a.i. plot−1), manufacturer’s double recommended dosage (51.2 g a.i. plot−1), and control (water) were applied. Thiram residues were detected in the soil from day 0 to day 3 in the range of 0.22–27.04 mg kg−1. Low concentrations of thiram were observed in the water and leave samples in the range of 0.27–2.52 mg L−1 and 1.34–12.28 mg kg−1, respectively. Results have shown that thiram has a rapid degradation and has less persistence due to climatic factors. These findings suggest that thiram is safe when applied at manufacturer’s recommended dosage on oil palm seedlings due to low residual levels observed in soil and water bodies.

Keywords

Thiram Persistence Oil palm Nursery Field study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wished to express our deepest gratitude and appreciation to the Director-General of MPOB for the authorisation in the publication of this article. We would like to thank the management of RISDA Semaian dan Landskap Sdn. Bhd. (RSSB) for their kindness in granting permission to undertake the experiment at their premises.

References

  1. Ainie K, Ai TY, Kamaruddin N, Beng YC (2007) Pesticide application in the oil palm plantation. Oil Palm Bull 54:52–67Google Scholar
  2. Alizadeh N, Kalhor H, Karimi A (2015) Determination of thiram residues in canola seeds, water and soil samples using solid-phase microextraction with polypyrrole film followed by ion mobility spectrometer. Intern J Environ Anal Chem 95:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behle RW, Mcguire MR, Shasha BS (1997) Effects of sunlight and simulated rain on residual activity of Bacillus thuringiensis formulations. J Econ Entomol 90:1560–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabras P, Angioni A, Garau VL, Melis M, Pirisi FM, Cabitza F, Pala M (2001) The effect of simulated rain on folpet and mancozeb residues on grapes and on vine leaves. J Environ Sci Health B 36:609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai L, Mohd-Tahir N, Hansen S, Hansen HCB (2009) Dissipation and leaching of acephate, chlorpyrifos, and their main metabolites in field soils of Malaysia. J Environ Qual 38:1160–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng YW, Chang YS, Ng KH, Wu TY, Cheng CK (2017) Photocatalytic restoration of liquid effluent from oil palm agroindustry in Malaysia using tungsten oxides catalyst. J Clean Prod 162:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EPA (2004). United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Filipe O, Vidal M, Scherer H, Schneider R, Duarte A, Esteves V, Santos E (2010) Effect of long term organic amendments on adsorption–desorption of thiram onto a luvisol soil derived from loess. Chemosphere 80:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flood J (2004) Diseases and treatments of seed and nursery materials. International Conference on Pets and Diseases of Importance to the Oil Palm Industry, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia AL, Gonzalez EB, Sanz-Medel A (1996) Determination of tetramethylthiuram disulfide (Thiram) in river water by high-performance liquid chromatography: micellar versus conventional reversed phase chromatography. Chromatographia 43:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta B, Rani M, Kumar R (2012) Degradation of thiram in water, soil and plants: a study by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biomed Chromatogr 26:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halimah M, Zulkifli H, Vijaya S, Tan YA, Chew PC, Let CC, May CY (2010) Life cycle assessment of oil palm seedling production (Part 1). J Oil Palm Res 22:878–886Google Scholar
  13. Irth H, De Jong G, Frei R, Brinkman UT (1990) Determination of dithiocarbamates in residues by liquid chromatography with selective precolumn or reaction-detection systems. Int J Environ Anal Chem 39:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ismail B, Choo LY, Salmijah S, Halimah M, Tayeb M (2015) Adsorption, desorption and mobility of cyfluthrin in three Malaysian tropical soils of different textures. J Environ Biol 36:1105Google Scholar
  15. Laabs V, Amelung W, Pinto A, Zech W (2002) Fate of pesticides in tropical soils of Brazil under field conditions. J Environ Qual 31:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li W, Ma Y, Li L, Qin D-M, Wu Y-J (2011) The dissipation rates of trichlorfon and its degradation product dichlorvos in cabbage and soil. Chemosphere 82:829–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu S, Bai A, Zhou L, Yu C, Li Y, Fan S, Pan C (2015) Dissipation and residues of thiram in potato and soil. J Chem 2015, 1–6Google Scholar
  18. Maznah Z, Sahid I, Muhamad H (2012) Fate of thiram in an oil palm nursery during the wet season. J Oil Palm Res 24:1397–1403Google Scholar
  19. Maznah Z, Halimah M, Ismail BS (2016) Adsorption–desorption behaviour of thiram: effect of soil types, temperature and pH. Chil J Agric Res 76(3):371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muhamad H, Ai TY, Sahid I, Mat N (2010) Downward movement of chlorpyrifos in the soil of an oil palm plantation in Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia. J Oil Palm Res 22:721–728Google Scholar
  21. Rafii YM (2004). Tapak semaian. Esnan AG, Zawawi ZZ, Basri WM (eds) In: Perusahaan Sawit di Malaysia-Satu Panduan. Lembaga Minyak Sawit Malaysia (MPOB), Kuala Lumpur, pp 63–80Google Scholar
  22. Sharma VK, Aulakh J, Malik AK (2003) Thiram: degradation, applications and analytical methods. J Environ Monit 5:717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma D, Gupta A, Kashyap R (2011) Polarographic determination of the fungicide thiram in relation to its environmental and toxicological analysis. Toxicol Environ Chem 93:1319–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Srivastava RK, Singh BK, Mani D (2013) Effect of organic matter on adsorption and persistence of thiram fungicide in different soils. Asian J Chem 25:292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Srivastava A, Suyal A, Srivastava P (2017) Persistence behavior of penoxsulam herbicide in two different soils. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 99:470–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas K (2001) The environmental fate and behaviour of antifouling paint booster biocides: a review. Biofouling 17:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zainol Maznah
    • 1
  • Muhamad Halimah
    • 1
  • B. Sahid Ismail
    • 2
  1. 1.Analytical and Quality Development Unit, Product Development and Advisory Services DivisionMalaysian Palm Oil BoardKajangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations