Skip to main content

Comparison of Analytical Methods and Residue Patterns of Pymetrozine in Aster scaber

Abstract

Residues of the polar pesticide pymetrozine were compared using two methods: hydromatrix and liquid–liquid extraction (LLE). The biological half-life and the final residue level were investigated using Aster scaber over a 10-days cultivation period. The respective biological half-lives of the pesticide were 4.2 and 3.5 days at the recommended and double dose. The final residue levels were 1.28 and 1.98 mg kg−1, respectively, at the same application rate of pymetrozine according to the GAP standard of the United Kingdom. Average recovery was higher with LLE than with the hydromatrix method. Dissipation curves of pymetrozine were influenced by the application amount and growth rate of A. scaber. The final residue level of pymetrozine could be predicted to be lower than the UK maximum residue limit for lettuce applying the GAP standard.

Pymetrozine [(E)-4,5-dihydro-6-methyl-4-(3-pyridylmethyleneamino)-1,2,4-triazin-3(2H)-one] (Fig. 1) is a novel selective insecticide that represents a new chemical class of insecticides with remarkable selectivity for plant-sucking insects such as aphids (Fuog et al. 1998; Cun et al. 2011). It acts in a unique way by interfering in the regulation of the nervous system for feeding behavior, which results in death of the insect due to starvation a few days after application (Bextine et al. 2004; Guoqing et al. 2009). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified pymetrozine as a “likely” human carcinogen, and the data are insufficient to eliminate the need for a quantitative risk assessment. Because of the limited number of sites on which this pesticide is used, the low use rates, and low exposure, the actual risks to human health are below the level of concern (EPA 2000).

Fig. 1
figure1

Chemical structure of pymetrozine

Aster scaber is an edible dicotyledonous plant in the family Asteraceae (Compositae), the same family as lettuce. The maximum residue limit (MRL) for pymetrozine on lettuce has been established in the United Kingdom at 2 mg kg−1 (HSE 2008). Several methods have been developed for analyzing pymetrozine residues in plants, such as an enzyme immune assay (ELA), liquid chromatography (LC) with UV/vis, diode array detection (DAD), and mass spectrometry (MS). However, the most frequently used method is LC with UV/vis DAD (Peter et al. 1996; Zhang et al. 2007). Polar pesticides like pymetrozine (log Kow, −0.18) and dinotefuran (log Kow, −0.549) are known to be difficult to analyze. Therefore, this study sought to reveal efficient analytical methods for detecting pymetrozine residues and examined the biological half-life and residue pattern of this pesticide in A. scaber during cultivation. At the same time, the final residue levels at harvest for A. scaber and lettuce were predicted after pymetrozine was sprayed according to the GAP standard of the United Kingdom.

Materials and Methods

A formulation containing 25% pymetrozine WP (CHESS WP®) was purchased from Syngenta Korea Inc., Republic of Korea. The reference standard for pymetrozine (purity, 99.9%) was obtained from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany). Methanol, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and other solvents used were of analytical grade; anhydrous sodium sulfate was graded as being extra pure. The experimental field under a vinyl house was located in Yangchon, Nonsan City, Chungnam Province, Korea. The field grown A. scaber was divided into nine 15-m2 plots. A complete randomized block design was applied with three replicates. The treatments were the following: untreated control (water only), standard dose of 200 g a.i. ha−1, and double dose of 400 g a.i. ha−1 CHESS WP®. The spray volume was 3.5 L 15 m−2. After spraying, representative A. scaber plants were collected at 0 (2 h), 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days. The samples were stored in a freezer at −20°C until analysis.

Hydromatrix Method

A harvested A. scaber sample (10 g) was put into an Erlenmeyer flask with 60 mL methanol and 7 mL 0.05 M borax buffer. The flask was shaken on a mechanical shaker (Vision Scientific Co., Ltd., Korea) for 1 h and then filtered under vacuum through a Buchner funnel. The container and filter cakes were washed with 30 mL methanol, and the extracts were combined. The sample was evaporated in a vacuum rotary evaporator (EYELA, Japan) at 40°C until the extract volume reached about 10 mL, then 3 mL of saturated sodium chloride was added. The sample was loaded on an Extrelut refill pack filled with 12 g hydromatrix (Chem Tube-Hydromatrix, Varian, USA) and washed with 2 mL 0.05 M borax buffer. After 15 min, the column was eluted with 100 mL dichloromethane, then evaporated to dryness on a vacuum rotary evaporator at 40°C.

Liquid–liquid Extraction (LLE) Method

An A. scaber sample (10 g) was extracted with 60 mL methanol and 7 mL 0.05 M borax buffer, and filtered under vacuum through a Buchner funnel. The eluate was then evaporated in a vacuum rotary evaporator at 40°C to a volume of about 10 mL, then transferred to a 1-L separatory funnel with dichloromethane (4 × 40 mL) for LLE. For partitioning, saturated sodium chloride was added at 3 and 2 mL for the first and second partitioning, respectively. The organic phases were combined and evaporated to dryness with a vacuum rotary evaporator.

Cleanup

The dried extracts from the extractions were redissolved in 10 mL methanol/ethyl acetate (7:93, v/v). A 1-mL aliquot of concentrated extract was applied to the FL SPE cartridge (florisil 1,000 mg, 6 mL; Phenomenex USA). To remove impurities, the SPE cartridge was washed with 4 mL methanol/ethyl acetate (7:93, v/v) and eluted with 8 mL methanol/ethyl acetate (3:7, v/v). The eluate was evaporated to dryness in a vacuum rotary evaporator at 40°C, and the residue was dissolved in 2 mL methanol/water (2:8, v/v) for analysis by HPLC.

To compare recovery between the hydromatrix and LLE extraction methods, recovery studies were carried out (in triplicate) by fortification of pymetrozine at 0.5 mg kg−1 (10-times LOQ) and 2.5 mg kg−1 (50-times LOQ) using untreated A. scaber, respectively. The above extraction and cleanup procedures were applied for recovery studies. HPLC (SCL-10Avp DAD; Shimadzu, Japan) was used for the pesticide analysis. Separation was carried out on a Phenomenex Luna C8 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) maintained at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of methanol/water (3:7, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1. The injection volume was 20 μL and the best detection was attained at a wavelength of 298 nm with a 7.85 min retention time.

Results and Discussion

An external standard method was adopted in this experiment. A six-point calibration curve from 0.025 to 5.0 mg kg−1 (peak area vs. concentration) was constructed for quantitative analysis of pymetrozine. The linear equation was y = 130716x + 952.92 (R 2 = 1.0000).

Pymetrozine was added to untreated control samples at two levels (0.5 and 2.5 mg kg−1). For method validation, control and fortified samples were analyzed under the same conditions. The reported results are mean of three replicates, whereby the coefficient of variation (CV) was within 10%. The results of the recovery studies are presented in Table 1. To compare chromatograms between LLE and hydromatrix, HPLC chromatograms are provided in Fig. 2. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) of pymetrozine in A. scaber was calculated as 0.05 mg kg−1 and the minimum detectable quantity was 5 × 10−10 g. Average recovery was higher with the LLE than the hydromatrix method, and the CV was more precise for the former.

Table 1 Comparison of recovery methods for pymetrozine from Aster scaber (n = 3)
Fig. 2
figure2

HPLC chromatograms of Aster scaber treated with pymetrozine: a control for LLE; b control for hydromatrix; c recovery with LLE at 2.5 mg kg−1; d recovery with hydromatrix at 2.5 mg kg−1

Plant residue estimations for pymetrozine were carried out over 10 days following the spraying treatment. Initial (2 h) residues were 2.86 and 6.21 mg kg−1 at the recommended dose and double dose, respectively. Ten days after application, the remaining residues of pymetrozine were 0.60 and 0.79 mg kg−1; i.e., 79.02% and 87.28% of the initial residue levels had already dissipated. Figure 3 shows the change in pymetrozine residues for the seven sample times at 0–10 days after spraying. The kinetics of pymetrozine can be described with the following equations, y = 2.8706e−0.1644t (R 2 = 0.9799) and y = 5.9791e−0.1996t (R 2 = 0.9950), and the biological half-life in A. scaber was 4.22 and 3.47 days at the recommended dose and the double dose, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure3

Dissipation of pymetrozine in Aster scaber

The average weight of representative plant samples after 0–10 days were 1.87 ± 0.23 g (n = 20) at day 0 and increased to 4.78 ± 0.41 g (n = 20) at day 10. However, the average weight of representative A. scaber cultivated under the vinyl house differed according to cultivation date. Over 10 days, plant weight increased 2.56-fold from 17–27 May 2011 and 5.45-fold from 29 April to 9 May 2011 (NAQS 2011).

The pesticide dilution effect (f′) was calculated from the remaining pymetrozine and weight of A. scaber over 10 days (Kim et al. 2009). For the three cases of considered growth rate, non-considered growth rate (NGR), 2.56-fold growth rate (Low Growth Rate, LGR), and 5.45-fold growth rate (High Growth Rate, HGR), the residue pattern in relation to growth at the double dose are given in Fig. 4. The biological half-life was 7.55, 3.47, and 1.91 days in the case of NGR (y = 5.3410e−0.0918t), LGR (y = 5.9791e−0.1996t), and HGR (y = 6.8575e−0.3636t), respectively. Therefore, the growth rate of A. scaber influences the residue levels of pymetrozine.

$$ f^{\prime} = \frac{{{\text{Residue} \, \text{at}} \, 0 \, {\text{days}} \times {\text{Weight} \,\text{of}} \, Aster \, scaber \, {\text{at}} \, 0 \, {\text{days}}}}{{{\text{Weight of}}\,Aster \, scaber\,{\text{at sample collection}}}} $$
Fig. 4
figure4

Dilution effect of pymetrozine on Aster scaber in relation to growth rate

The rapid growth rate of cucumber will cause a dilution of pesticide residues over time, even if the pesticide does not degrade (Metwally et al. 1997). Moreover, Talebi and Ahsaii (2006) reported that no residues were detected in cucumber 4 days after spraying with pymetrozine under field conditions.

The final residue levels in A. scaber were compared when pymetrozine was sprayed according to the GAP standard of the United Kingdom for lettuce (application: three times at a spray interval of 7 days, and a maximum dose of 0.4 kg a.i. ha−1, PHI: 7 days). The prediction was calculated based on the initial amount sprayed and the coefficient of regression (Kim et al. 2009). Pymetrozine residues according to application amount are given in Fig. 5. After spraying with 1.2 kg ha−1 (double dose, 0.4 kg ha−1 × 3), the final residue level was predicted to be 1.98 mg kg−1 at harvest. After spraying with 0.6 kg ha−1 (recommended dose, 0.2 kg ha−1 × 3), the residue level was 1.28 mg kg−1. From this prediction, the pymetrozine residue on lettuce was below the maximum residue limit of the United Kingdom (2 mg kg−1) 7 and 5 days after spraying with a double dose or the recommended dose, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure5

Predicted final residue level of pymetrozine according to application amount

References

  1. Bextine BR, Harshman D, Johnson MC, Miller TA (2004) Impact of pymetrozine on glassy-winged sharpshooter feeding behavior and rate of Xylella fastidiosa transmission. J Insect Sci 4:34–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cun L, Ting Y, Weiguo H, Yinliang W (2011) Residue and dynamics of pymetrozine in rice field ecosystem. Chemosphere 82:901–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuog D, Fergusson FJ, Fluckiger C (1998) Pymetrozine: a novel insecticide affecting aphids and whiteflies. In: lshaaya I, Degheele D (eds) Insecticides with novel modes of action: mechanism and application. Springer, Berlin, pp 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guoqing S, Xuan H, Yinan H (2009) Kinetic study of the degradation of the insecticide pymetrozine in a vegetable-field ecosystem. J Hazard Mater 164:497–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2008) Maximum residue limit database. Available at http://www.secure.pesticides.gov.uk/MRLs/. Accessed 4 May 2011

  6. Kim SW, Lee EM, Lin Y, Park HW, Lee HR, Riu MJ, Na YR, Noh JE, Keum YS, Kim JH (2009) Establishment of pre-harvest residue limit(PHRL) of insecticide Bifenthrin during cultivation of grape. Korean J Pesti Sci 13(4):241–248

    Google Scholar 

  7. Metwally MES, Osman MS, Al-Rushaid R (1997) A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of cypermethrin in vegetables and its application to kinetic studies after greenhouse treatment. Food Chem 59:283–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Agricultural Products Quality Management Services (NAQS) (2011) Deliberation on establishment of pre-harvest residue limit on products, Rep. of Korea, pp 277–294

  9. Peter W, Martin B, Christian P (1996) Development of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of the insecticide pymetrozine. Anal Lett. doi:10.1080/00032719608002257

  10. Talebi K, Ahsaii HG (2006) Determination of pymetrozine residues in cucumber. Commun Agric Appl Bio Sci 71:75–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000) Fact sheet. Available at http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/factsheets/pymetrozine.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2011

  12. Zhang X, Cheng X, Wang C, Xi Z, Li Q (2007) Efficient high-performance liquid chromatography with liquid–liquid partition cleanup method for the determination of pymetrozine in tobacco. Annali di Chimica 97:295–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Services, Republic of Korea.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyu-Seung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, JH., Lee, CR., Lim, JS. et al. Comparison of Analytical Methods and Residue Patterns of Pymetrozine in Aster scaber . Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 87, 649–652 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0407-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pymetrozine
  • LLE
  • Hydromatrix
  • Growth rate