Abstract
Court-ordered monitoring of blood cholinesterases (ChEs) from orchard workers in Washington State is underway. In 2008, the mean red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (AChE, EC 3.1.1.7) activity was 9.65 ± 1.11 μmoles/min/ml (n = 1,793) and the mean serum (BChE, 3.1.1.6) activity was 5.19 ± 0.90 μmoles/min/ml (n = 1,811). Determinations were made using the Ellman assay and automated equipment of Pathology Associates Medical Laboratories (PAML), Spokane, Washington.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Inhibition of ChEs in human blood is commonly used to identify possible exposures to many neurochemicals used as pesticides and military agents. Following WW II, the release of classified information about nerve agents and the increased use of neurochemicals in agriculture (Wilson 2001) resulted in setting regulations based largely upon animal studies and ChE activities of human cells such as erythrocytes.
Examples of human ChE data include a large pH blood assay database of the Department of Defense Cholinesterase Reference Laboratory (CRL) at the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (CHPPM), compilations of data from blood of agricultural workers (Wiedemann et al. 1995) and a comparison of serum and RBC values from 400 male and 400 female blood donors (Rider et al. 1957). Monitoring of agricultural workers usually is performed with small numbers of samples ordered by physicians under state regulated programs or individual samples taken when exposures to pesticides are suspected. These results are ordinarily not stored in databases accessible for epidemiological analysis.
The findings presented here were obtained from a court ordered monitoring program conducted under the auspices of the Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington (Harrington 2002). They represent base line data of blood ChEs from a sample of presumably unexposed orchard workers.
They are presented here to show the distribution of enzyme activity in blood of a large population of orchard workers in Washington State.
Materials and Methods
Informed consent of the participants was obtained. Results are available upon request from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. Blood was obtained by venipuncture in Washington by licensed phlebotomists from presumably unexposed pesticide mixers, loaders and applicators enrolled in the monitoring program. The blood was collected in EDTA-containing vacutainers, and shipped cold for analysis by Pathology Associates Medical Laboratories (PAML). There, the temperatures of the samples were recorded, and hematocrits obtained. Acetylthiocholine hydrolysis was determined for sera and whole blood using an automated instrument (Olympus) and the Ellman assay (Ellman et al. 1961). Sera and red blood cell activities were calculated and the data stored for further processing using the averages of duplicate measurements. A bovine red blood cell ghost AChE preparation from the Wilson laboratory (Wilson et al. 2005) and a commercial human serum ChE preparation, Precipath (Roche Diagnostics), were included as standards. Separation of the data into categories such as age and gender were not germane to the purposes of the study.
Results and Discussion
The data were from a large sample of agricultural workers. Red blood cell AChE activities averaged 9.65 ± 1.11 (μmol/min/ml blood, n = 1,793, mean ± SD) and serum ChE activities averaged 5.19 ± 0.90 (μmol/min/ml serum, n = 1,811) at 37°C, as represented in the unimodal distributions shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
There have been few studies of ChE levels in blood of large populations. One of the most recent is that of Arrieta et al. (2009), which presents a unimodal distribution of red blood cell AChE from the CHPPM database (determined by pH assays). RBC AChE activities of 991 subjects averaged 8.11 ± 0.92 (μmol/min/ml RBC; converted to Ellman units, Arrieta et al. 2004) at 25°C independent of age or gender, ~85% of the mean RBC value from PAML (assayed at 37°C). Another study is that of Rider et al. (1957) in which blood from 400 male and 400 female donors divided into 10 year age groups (12 males and 12 females per group) were assayed using the delta pH method of Michel (1949). They found no significant difference in RBC AChE values due to gender or age.
The data shown here were based on clinical laboratory monitoring rather than on a controlled research study. PAML is to be complimented for taking the time to revise their procedures to meet the needs of this public health project. The next step in this project will focus on the blood ChEs of orchard workers during spray season before and after handling pesticides.
Long before this orchard worker monitoring study was initiated; the state of California chose a decrease from base line of 20% of blood ChE activity to signal investigations of possible exposures to organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides (Title 3, California Code of Regulations, section 6,728 (d), Medical Supervision). Perhaps comparing individual enzyme levels to base line population distributions can be used when individual base lines are not available. Although it is accepted that decreases of ChE activity of 20%–30% suggest a red flag of exposure (Wilson 2001), a solid no-adverse-effect-level is lacking to specify further damage.
References
Arrieta DE, Nihart VM, Henderson JD, McCurdy SA, Reitstetter RE, Lefkowitz LJ, Wilson BW (2004) Comparison of delta pH and Ellman colorimetric cholinesterase assays. Presented at US Army Medical Defense Review Bioscience, Hunt Valley, MD, 16–21 May 2004
Arrieta DE, McCurdy SA, Henderson JD, Lefkowitz LJ, Reitstetter R, Wilson BW (2009) Normal range of human red blood cell cholinesterase activity. Drug Chem Toxicol (in press)
Ellman GL, Courtney GK, Anders V, Featherstone RM (1961) A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9
Harrington MJ (2002) Pesticide exposure monitoring. Agrochem Environ News 194:1–6
Michel HO (1949) An electrometric method for the determination of red blood cell and plasma cholinesterase. J Lab Clin Med 34:1564–1568
Rider J, Hodges J, Swader J, Wiggins M (1957) Plasma and red blood cell cholinesterase is 800 “Healthy” blood donors. J Lab Clin Med 50(3):376–383
Wiedemann G, Simon T, Wetzel D, Hofmann B, Joerg M (1995) Studies in establishing reference ranges for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, cholinesterase, lactate dehydrogenase, and α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase in neonates, children, adolescents, and adults. Laboratoriumsmedizin 19(2):57–70
Wilson BW (2001) Acetylcholinesterases. In: Krieger R (ed) Handbook of pesticide toxicology. Academic Press, New York, pp 967–985
Wilson BW, Arrieta DE, Henderson JD (2005) Monitoring cholinesterases to detect pesticide exposure. Chem Biol Interact 157–158:253–256. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2005.10.043
Acknowledgments
This study was performed under a contract from Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L & I). The authors acknowledge the assistance of Elliott Briggs and Craig Brown of PAML.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9793-6
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, B.W., Henderson, J.D., Furman, J.L. et al. Blood Cholinesterases from Washington State Orchard Workers. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83, 59–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9724-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9724-6