The association between type and number of adverse working conditions and mental health during a time of economic crisis (2010–2012)
- 527 Downloads
Many studies have been published on the association between adverse psychosocial working conditions and mental health, but only a few related types of adverse job conditions and a count of these adversities to workers’ mental health, using standardized diagnostic interviews. This study addresses this issue.
Data were used from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2, a nationally representative face-to-face survey of the general population, including 3,672 workers, 166 unemployed and 239 disabled persons. Among workers, psychosocial working conditions (decision latitude, psychological job demands, job security and co-worker support) were assessed with the Job Content Questionnaire. Mental health symptoms were assessed with the Mental Health Inventory (MHI)-5 and DSM-IV diagnoses/syndromes with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0.
Adverse psychosocial job conditions were related to workers’ mental health. The strongest association was found for low job security which increased the chance of mental health symptoms and mental disorders by twofold. Workers in the poorest quality jobs, i.e. experiencing at least three adverse working conditions, had a 3 to almost 5 times higher chance of mental disorders than those in the most optimal jobs. Having a poor quality job was not associated with better mental health compared to being unemployed or disabled. In general, similar relations were found for mood, anxiety and substance use disorders.
In planning future strategies to prevent mental disorders at the workplace, the focus should be on workers who experience job insecurity and on those who report several adversities.
KeywordsPopulation survey Work–psychological aspects Mental disorders Job satisfaction Job stress
NEMESIS-2 is conducted by the Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute) in Utrecht. Financial support has been received from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, with supplementary support from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) investigators.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 2.Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life (Appendix I). Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 4.Siegrist J (1999) Occupational health and public health in Germany. In: Le Blanc PM, Peeters MCW, Büssing A, Schaufeli WB (eds) Organizational psychology and healthcare: European contributions. Rainer Hampp Verlag, München, pp 35–44Google Scholar
- 12.WHO. International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull World Health Organ 78:413–426Google Scholar
- 25.de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Tuithof M et al (2013) Sociodemographic and psychiatric predictors of attrition in a prospective psychiatric epidemiological study among the general population. Result of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2. Compr Psychiatry 54:1131–1139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Statistics Netherlands. http://www.cbs.nl
- 32.Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF (1989) Analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- 43.Ferrie JE, Shipley MJ, Stansfeld SA et al (2002) Effects of chronic job insecurity and change in job security on self-reported health, minor psychiatric morbidity, physiological measures, and health related behaviours in British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:450–454CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.European commission, Eurostat. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics