Skip to main content
Log in

Stability of latent classes in group-based trajectory modeling of depressive symptoms in mothers of children with epilepsy: an internal validation study using a bootstrapping procedure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to utilize bootstrapping to investigate the robustness of latent class trajectories and risk factors of depressive symptoms among mothers of children with epilepsy.

Methods

Data were obtained from a national prospective cohort study (2004–09) of children newly diagnosed with epilepsy and their families in Canada (n = 339). Latent classes of depressive symptom trajectories were modeled using a semi-parametric group-based trajectory modeling approach. Multinomial logistic regression identified risk factors predicting trajectory group membership.

Results

Four trajectories were identified: low stable, borderline, moderate increasing, and high decreasing. Goodness of fit, posterior probabilities, and parameter estimates obtained with bootstrapping were not significantly different from the original sample. Calculation of the root mean square error demonstrated minimal non-ignorable bias for three parameter estimates, which was subsequently removed with additional sampling. Risk factors identified were identical for the original sample and the bootstrap, and differences in odds ratios, as calculated with the method of variance estimation recovery, were not significant.

Conclusions

As examined using a bootstrapping procedure, group-based trajectory modeling offers a robust methodology to uncover potential heterogeneity in populations and identify high-risk individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In comparison to other models tested, the four-group model demonstrated the best fit based on the specified criteria, and had the highest probability of being the correct model. A three-group model had a BIC index of −4204.84 and −4197.17 posterior probabilities of group membership ranging from 0.82 to 0.93 and 0.81 to 0.93 for the original and bootstrap samples, respectively. A five-group model had a BIC index of −4188.88 and −4179.13 posterior probabilities of group membership ranging from 0.71 to 0.87 and 0.73 to 0.91, respectively.

References

  1. Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Stryker LA (2006) An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling, 2nd edn., Concepts, issues, and applicationsLawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gump BB, Reihman J, Stewart P, Lonky E, Darvill T, Granger DA, Matthews KA (2009) Trajectories of maternal depressive symptoms over her child’s life span: relation to adrenocortical, cardiovascular, and emotional functioning in children. Dev Psychopathol 21:207–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cambron MJ, Acitelli LK, Steinberg L (2010) When friends make you blue: the role of friendship contingent self-esteem in predicting self-esteem and depressive symptoms. Per Soc Psychol Bull 36:384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marmorstein NR (2010) Longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and alcohol problems: the influence of comorbid delinquent behavior. Addict Behav 35:564–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferro MA, Avison WR, Campbell MK, Speechley KN (2011) The impact of maternal depressive symptoms on health-related quality of life in children with epilepsy: a prospective study of family environment as mediators and moderators. Epilepsia 52:316–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss RE (2005) Modeling longitudinal data. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagin DS (2005) Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagin DS, Tremblay RE (2005) What has been learned from group-based trajectory modeling? Examples from physical aggression and other problem behaviors. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 602:82–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagin DS, Tremblay RE (2005) Further reflections on modeling and analyzing developmental trajectories: a response to Maughan and Raudenbush. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 602:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raudenbush SW (2005) How do we study “what happens next”? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 602:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raudenbush SW (2001) Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol 52:501–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazza JJ, Fleming CB, Abbott RD, Haggerty KP, Catalano RF (2010) Identifying trajectories of adolescents’ depressive phenomena: an examination of early risk factors. J Youth Adolesc 39:579–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wickrama T, Wickrama KA (2010) Heterogeneity in adolescent depressive symptom trajectories: implications for young adults’ risky lifestyle. J Adolesc Health 47:407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buckingham-Howes S, Oberlander SE, Hurley KM, Fitzmaurice S, Black MM (2011) Trajectories of adolescent mother-grandmother psychological conflict during early parenting and children’s problem behaviors at age 7. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 40:445–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferro MA, Avison WR, Campbell MK, Speechley KN (2011) Prevalence and trajectories of depressive symptoms in mothers of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Epilepsia 52:326–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bickel P, Freedman DA (1984) Asymptotic normality and the bootstrap in stratified sampling. Ann Stat 12:470–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1:54–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Parke J, Charles BG (2000) Factors affecting oral cyclosporin disposition after heart transplantation: bootstrap validation of a population pharmacokinetic model. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56:481–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brunelli A, Rocco G (2006) Internal validation of risk models in lung resection surgery: bootstrap versus training-and-test sampling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:1243–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferro MA, Speechley KN (2012) Examining clinically relevant levels of depressive symptoms in mothers following a diagnosis of epilepsy in their children: a prospective analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47:1419–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferro MA, Avison WR, Campbell MK, Speechley KN (2010) Do depressive symptoms affect mothers’ reports of child outcomes in children with new-onset epilepsy? Qual Life Res 19:955–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measures 1:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabaz M, Lawson JA, Cairns DR, Duchowny MS, Resnick TJ, Dean PM, Bye AM (2003) Validation of the quality of life in childhood epilepsy questionnaire in American epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Behav 4:680–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabaz M, Cairns DR, Lawson JA, Nheu N, Bleasel AF, Bye AM (2000) Validation of a new quality of life measure for children with epilepsy. Epilepsia 41:765–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Speechley KN, Sang X, Levin S, Zou GY, Eliasziw M, Smith ML, Camfield C, Wiebe S (2008) Assessing severity of epilepsy in children: preliminary evidence of validity and reliability of a single-item scale. Epilepsy Behav 13:337–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smilkstein G (1978) The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Pract 6:1231–1239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smilkstein G, Ashworth C, Montano D (1982) Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. J Fam Pract 15:303–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Austin JK, Risinger MW, Beckett LA (1992) Correlates of behavior problems in children with epilepsy. Epilepsia 33:1115–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA (1996) FIRM: family inventory of resources for management., Family assessment: resiliency, coping and adaptation Inventories for research and practiceUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  34. McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA (1996) FILE: family inventory of life events and changes., Family assessment: resiliency, coping and adaptation Inventories for research and practiceUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  35. Campbell SB, Morgan-Lopez AA, Cox MJ, McLoyd VC (2009) A latent class analysis of maternal depressive symptoms over 12 years and offspring adjustment in adolescence. J Abnorm Psychol 118:479–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Henderson AR (2005) The bootstrap: a technique for data-driven statistics. Using computer-intensive analyses to explore experimental data. Clin Chim Acta 359:1–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zou GY (2008) On the estimation of additive interaction by use of the four-by-two table and beyond. Am J Epidemiol 168:212–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zou GY, Donner A (2008) Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: a general approach. Stat Med 27:1693–1702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jones BL, Nagin DS, Roeder K (2001) A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Soc Methods Res 29:374–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jones BL, Nagin DS (2007) Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and a SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociol Method Res 35:542–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Blackstone EH (2001) Breaking down barriers: helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:430–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hughes S, Cohen D (2009) A systematic review of long-term studies of drug treated and non-drug treated depression. J Affect Disord 118:9–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Muthen B (2004) Latent variable analysis. Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In: Kaplan D (ed) Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bauer DJ, Curran PJ (2003) Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychol Methods 8:338–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ferro MA, Speechley KN (2012) Depressive symptoms in mothers of children with epilepsy: a comparison of growth curve and latent class modeling. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 12:44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Roeder K, Lynch KG, Nagin DS (1999) Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology. J Am Stat Asso 94:766–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Bobby Jones for his assistance with PROC TRAJ. This research was funded by an operating grant to Dr. Kathy Speechley from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (MOP-64311) and a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to Dr. Mark Ferro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Ferro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferro, M.A., Speechley, K.N. Stability of latent classes in group-based trajectory modeling of depressive symptoms in mothers of children with epilepsy: an internal validation study using a bootstrapping procedure. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48, 1077–1086 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0622-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0622-6

Keywords

Navigation