Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
This study aimed to describe the relationship between breastfeeding episodes and maternal glucose levels, and to assess whether this differs with closed-loop vs open-loop (sensor-augmented pump) insulin therapy.
Methods
Infant-feeding diaries were collected at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks postpartum in a trial of postpartum closed-loop use in 18 women with type 1 diabetes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were used to identify maternal glucose patterns within the 3 h of breastfeeding episodes. Generalised mixed models adjusted for breastfeeding episodes in the same woman, repeat breastfeeding episodes, carbohydrate intake, infant age at time of feeding and early pregnancy HbA1c. This was a secondary analysis of data collected during a randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT04420728).
Results
CGM glucose remained above 3.9 mmol/l in the 3 h post-breastfeeding for 93% (397/427) of breastfeeding episodes. There was an overall decrease in glucose at nighttime within 3 h of breastfeeding (1.1 mmol l−1 h−1 decrease on average; p=0.009). A decrease in nighttime glucose was observed with open-loop therapy (1.2 ± 0.5 mmol/l) but was blunted with closed-loop therapy (0.4 ± 0.3 mmol/l; p<0.01, open-loop vs closed-loop).
Conclusions/interpretation
There is a small decrease in glucose after nighttime breastfeeding that usually does not result in maternal hypoglycaemia; this appears to be blunted with the use of closed-loop therapy.
Graphical Abstract
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Breastfeeding is recommended in women with diabetes because of the associated short- and long-term benefits to the child, including reduced risk of obesity [1, 2] and diabetes [3, 4]. Despite this, women with diabetes are less likely to breastfeed than those without diabetes [5]. While the reasons for this are likely multifactorial, hypoglycaemia following breastfeeding is a feared event among women with type 1 diabetes [6].
This exploratory study examines the relationship between maternal interstitial continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glucose levels and breastfeeding episodes. Data were collected from infant-feeding diaries obtained during the CLIMB study, which was a randomised controlled trial of closed-loop insulin delivery postpartum [7].
The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between breastfeeding episodes and maternal glucose, and to assess if this relationship differs according to postpartum insulin therapy with closed-loop or open-loop (sensor-augmented pump) therapy.
Methods
This study represents an exploratory secondary analysis of data collected during the CLIMB study, which was a randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT04420728)
CLIMB study
Design details of the CLIMB study have previously been reported [7]. Briefly, the CLIMB study was a postpartum randomised controlled trial of closed-loop insulin delivery with the MiniMed 670G/770G systems (Medtronic, Northridge, CA, USA). Eighteen women used the MiniMed 670G/770G insulin pump with real-time CGM (Guardian Link 3 sensors and transmitters; Medtronic) from 1 week to 24 weeks postpartum; from 1 week to 11 weeks and 6 days postpartum, participants were randomised 1:1 to use either closed-loop (MiniMed 670G/770G in ‘Auto Mode’) or open-loop (MiniMed 670G/770G in ‘Manual Mode’) insulin delivery. During a continuation phase, all CLIMB participants were assigned to used closed-loop therapy from 12 weeks to 24 weeks postpartum.
Three-day infant-feeding diaries [5] were collected at 6 ± 2 weeks, 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks postpartum. Participants recorded the time breastfeeding started so that CGM glucose data from CareLink (https://carelink-trials.medtronic.com; accessed 20 November 2023) could be related to timing of breastfeeding. Time of breastmilk pumping data were not collected.
As previously published, all participants were advised to reduce insulin-pump dosing 1–2 h prior to childbirth. Participants were informed that some women with type 1 diabetes report hypoglycaemia with breastfeeding and, should they experience this, that a small carbohydrate snack during breastfeeding may be consumed. Use of the SmartGuard ‘Suspend-before-low’ feature, which stops insulin delivery when approaching a low CGM glucose level, was permitted among participants randomised to sensor-augmented pump therapy; three participants were advised to use this feature but only one did so [7].
Information on carbohydrate intake and use of open-loop or closed-loop therapy during breastfeeding was obtained from CareLink. Our analysis focused on nighttime (23:00–07:00 hours) breastfeeding. In doing so, the relationship between breastfeeding and maternal CGM glucose levels was explored during a period when factors that strongly influence maternal glycaemia (i.e. meals and exercise) would be infrequent. To allow comparison with other studies [8, 9], we determined the incidence of low glucose, defined as CGM glucose <3.9 mmol/l, of any duration in the 3 h after the initiation of breastfeeding.
The University of Calgary’s (Calgary, AB, Canada) Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (Ethics ID: REB19–1470) and the three other Canadian recruitment centres (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON; Laval University, Quebec City, QC; and University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB) approved this study. All participants signed written informed consent.
Statistical analysis
CGM glucose data 3 h pre- and post-breastfeeding were compared according to the insulin delivery method used at the time of the breastfeed (i.e. open-loop vs closed-loop). Generalised mixed models were adjusted for breastfeeding episodes in the same woman, repeat breastfeeding episodes, carbohydrate intake, infant age at time of feed and early pregnancy HbA1c. Breastfeeding episodes were considered repeated if breastfeeding occurred more than once in the 3 h after initiation of breastfeeding. We pre-specified the use of separate models for breastfeeding episodes that occurred at nighttime (23:00–07:00 hours) and daytime (07:01–22:59 hours). Data for CGM glucose 3 h pre- and post-breastfeeding are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (Fig. 1). We determined the incidence of low CGM glucose after breastfeeding and compared this between each insulin delivery method.
All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
In total, 17 of 18 (94%) participants breastfed or pumped breastmilk for varying durations in the postpartum period [7]. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age for participants was 32.0 ± 3.4 years, with a mean duration of diabetes of 21.9 ± 7.2 years.
Overall, infant-feeding diaries were available for 17 (94%) participants (n=15 at 6 weeks, n=16 at 12 weeks and n=16 at 24 weeks postpartum). Overall nighttime breastfeeding episodes while using open-loop or closed-loop therapy were accompanied by a small mean decrease in maternal glucose (1.1 - l−1 h−1; p=0.009) within 3 h of the initiation of breastfeeding (Fig. 1a). The decrease in glucose with nighttime breastfeeding was less with closed-loop therapy (0.4 ± 0.3 mmol/l) compared with open-loop therapy (1.2 ± 0.5 mmol/l) (mean difference: 0.8 mmol/l [95% CI 0.73, 0.88]; p<0.01). Daytime breastfeeding did not result in a significant mean glucose decrease within 3 h of the initiation of breastfeeding (Fig. 1b).
Of the total number of nighttime breastfeeding episodes (N=127), six (5%) were accompanied by carbohydrate ingestion, as reported in the pump record 30 min before or after a breastfeeding episode (n=3 in the open-loop therapy group and n=3 in the closed-loop therapy group).
The number of breastfeeding episodes is shown in Table 2, along with incidence of low glucose in the 3 h after breastfeeding initiation. Overall, glucose remained at or above 3.9 mmol/l in 93% (397) of the 427 breastfeeding episodes within the 3 h after initiation of breastfeeding. The number of nighttime breastfeeding episodes with reported low glucose was 5 of 57 (8.8%) breastfeeds in the open-loop group and 2 of 70 (2.9%) breastfeeds in the closed-loop group; this difference did not reach statistical significance. For daytime breastfeeding episodes, 9 of 103 (8.7%) and 14 of 197 (7.1%) breastfeeds were followed by low glucose with open-loop and closed-loop therapy, respectively (Table 2). Nighttime glucose levels <3.9 mmol/l occurred, on average, 5.0 h and 6.4 h after a prior insulin bolus for the open-loop and closed-loop therapy groups, respectively.
Only two of the 12 women that contributed data for nighttime breastfeeding episodes in the closed-loop therapy group experienced low CGM glucose in the 3 h following a nighttime breastfeeding episode (each on one occasion). All four women that provided data for nighttime breastfeeding in the open-loop therapy group experienced low CGM glucose in the 3 h following nighttime breastfeeding initiation. There were fewer infant-feeding episodes in the open-loop therapy vs closed-loop therapy group because open-loop therapy was only used by half the participants in the first half of the study. There were only 26 nighttime bottle-feeding episodes, none of which were followed by low glucose within 3 h.
Discussion
CGM glucose remained above 3.9 mmol/l in the 3 h after starting breastfeeding in 93% of breastfeeding episodes. Nighttime but not daytime breastfeeding episodes were accompanied by a small decrease in maternal glucose within 3 h of the initiation of breastfeeding. The glucose decrease following nighttime breastfeeding was blunted with the use of closed-loop therapy compared with open-loop therapy.
Low CGM glucose was observed in only 2.9% of nighttime breastfeeding episodes with use of closed-loop therapy and 8.8% of nighttime breastfeeding episodes with use of open-loop therapy. Reassuringly, the low incidence of nocturnal CGM glucose <3.9 mmol/l in the 3 h following initiation of breastfeeding did not appear dependent on carbohydrate intake with breastfeeding; carbohydrate ingestion within the 30 min prior to or after breastfeeding initiation was documented in only 5% of nighttime breastfeeding episodes, which is similar to another study [8].
Milk is constantly produced in the breast tissue in breastfeeding women, so it is unsurprising that breastfeeding is accompanied by only a small decrease in maternal CGM glucose. Furthermore, decreases in glucose were only observed at nighttime, when factors that contribute to maternal glycaemic excursions, such as meals and exercise, occur infrequently. Oxytocin is secreted at the time of breastfeeding and can increase glucose uptake into skeletal muscle and cardiomyocytes [10, 11] via the oxytocin receptor [11]. This may provide an explanation for the small decrease in maternal glucose that was observed with nighttime breastfeeding episodes.
The small, but significant, decrease in glucose that occurred following the initiation of nighttime breastfeeding episodes is similar to that observed in another study [9]. This decrease was reassuringly small and is unlikely to be clinically relevant for breastfeeding women unless their blood glucose levels are at 4 mmol/l or less at the initiation of breastfeeding. Low CGM glucose occurred after 7% of all breastfeeding episodes in the 3 h following the initiation of breastfeeding. This is consistent with previous findings that showed a 5–14% incidence of low CGM glucose with blinded CGM in the 3 h following breastfeeding initiation [8, 9]. It is possible that women with type 1 diabetes who stop breastfeeding in the early postpartum period do so because they experience more hypoglycaemia. Since our study and the studies of others [8, 9] did not collect infant-feeding dairies until at least 4 weeks postpartum, it is possible that the study participants were less prone to hypoglycaemia. Interestingly, participants that stopped breastfeeding in our study reported that it was unrelated to glycaemia (M. Quintanilha, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, personal communication), consistent with some of the previous literature [9] but conflicting with others [6].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the influence of closed-loop therapy on maternal glucose response to breastfeeding, and to show that the nighttime glucose decrease with breastfeeding is blunted while using closed-loop therapy. Additional strengths of this study include the detailed breastfeeding data collected from free-living women postpartum. Limitations to our study include the small sample size and that we did not collect maternal dietary records and, thus, had to rely solely on carbohydrate data entered into the insulin pumps by the insulin-pump users. Given the small sample size it is unclear if our participants are representative of the larger type 1 diabetes population and if the findings will be consistent for people of all genders.
In conclusion, we observed a small decrease in maternal glucose after nighttime breastfeeding that usually does not result in maternal hypoglycaemia and appears blunted with the use of closed-loop therapy. Larger studies in more diverse populations are required to confirm these findings.
Abbreviations
- CGM:
-
Continuous glucose monitoring
References
Feig DS, Lipscombe LL, Tomlinson G, Blumer I (2011) Breastfeeding predicts the risk of childhood obesity in a multi-ethnic cohort of women with diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24(3):511–515. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.500711
Hummel S, Pfluger M, Kreichauf S, Hummel M, Ziegler AG (2009) Predictors of overweight during childhood in offspring of parents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32(5):921–925. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1943
Sadauskaite-Kuehne V, Ludvigsson J, Padaiga Z, Jasinskiene E, Samuelsson U (2004) Longer breastfeeding is an independent protective factor against development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 20(2):150–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.425
Owen CG, Martin RM, Whincup PH, Smith GD, Cook DG (2006) Does breastfeeding influence risk of type 2 diabetes in later life? A quantitative analysis of published evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 84(5):1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1043
Misita D, Yamamoto JM, Yuan Y, Donovan LE, Bell RC, Jarman M (2021) An exploration of differences in infant feeding practices among women with and without diabetes in pregnancy: a mixed-methods study. Diabet Med 38(11):e14635. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14635
Gu J, Chaput KH, Dunlop A, Booth J, Feig DS, Donovan LE (2023) Existing standardized questionnaires do not adequately capture quality-of-life outcomes of greatest importance for those living with type 1 diabetes in pregnancy. Diabet Med 40(4):e15044. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15044
Donovan LE, Feig DS, Lemieux P et al (2023) A randomized trial of closed-loop insulin delivery postpartum in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 46(12):2258–226. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0882
Ringholm L, Roskjaer AB, Engberg S et al (2019) Breastfeeding at night is rarely followed by hypoglycaemia in women with type 1 diabetes using carbohydrate counting and flexible insulin. Diabetologia 62(3):387–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4794-9
Achong N, McIntyre HD, Callaway L, Duncan EL (2016) Glycaemic behaviour during breastfeeding in women with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 33(7):947–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12993
Lee ES, Uhm KO, Lee YM, Kwon J, Park SH, Soo KH (2008) Oxytocin stimulates glucose uptake in skeletal muscle cells through the calcium-CaMKK-AMPK pathway. Regul Pept 151(1–3):71–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2008.05.001
Florian M, Jankowski M, Gutkowska J (2010) Oxytocin increases glucose uptake in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Endocrinology 151(2):482–91. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0624
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors thank those that participated in this research, as well as research staff, including C. Oldford and C. S. Young (both University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada), A. Galper (Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, and Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada), M.-C. Dubé (Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada) and M. Chrisp (University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada). We also thank B. Toppings (Toppings Engineering, Calgary, AB, Canada) for support with figure preparation.
Data availability
Study data are available from the corresponding author by request after ethics review and approval for the proposed study is provided and approved by the CLIMB steering committee.
Funding
The Calgary Health Trust funded this study (there is no grant number for this). Medtronic provided in-kind support of Guardian Link 3 transmitters and Guardian Sensor (3) sensors, and the loan of study devices, MiniMed 670G and 770G insulin pumps and transmitter docks. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, or data interpretation.
Authors’ relationships and activities
LED reports in-kind donations and reduced cost for study supplies for investigator-initiated trials from Medtronic, Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes Care and Inter-analytics. JMY reports in-kind donations and reduced cost for study supplies for investigator-initiated trials from Medtronic and Abbott. DSF reports in-kind donations for study supplies for investigator-initiated trials from Medtronic, Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes Care and Inter-analytics, is on the Advisory Board for Ypsomed and reports honoraria from Sanofi and Novo Nordisk. HRM sits on the Medtronic European Scientific Advisory Board and reports receiving speaker honoraria from Dexcom, Abbott, Medtronic and Novo Nordisk, and is a member of the Editorial Board of Diabetologia. RJS reports research support from Novo Nordisk. PL reports speaker fees from Dexcom. All other authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.
Contribution statement
LED, JMY, RJS and RCB designed the study protocol. LED, DSF, PL and JMY enrolled participants and provided clinical care to participants enrolled at their respective institutions. JH advised on infant outcomes. All authors contributed to the statistical analysis plan. LED oversaw the conduct of the trial. LED wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and provided critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published. LED and SC are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Donovan, L.E., Bell, R.C., Feig, D.S. et al. Glycaemic patterns during breastfeeding with postpartum use of closed-loop insulin delivery in women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06227-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06227-z