Abstract
Almost immediately after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus emerged, it was evident that people with chronic diseases, including diabetes, were disproportionately affected, with an increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality. Over the ensuing 2 years, the indirect effects of the pandemic on healthcare delivery in the short term have become prominent, along with the lingering effects of the virus in those directly infected. In the wake of the pandemic and without any evidence from high quality studies, a number of national and international consensus recommendations were published, which were subsequently rapidly updated based on observational studies. There have been unprecedented disruptions from both direct and indirect impacts of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in people with diabetes. In this review, we summarise the impact of acute COVID-19 in people with diabetes, discuss how the presentation and epidemiology during the pandemic, including presentation of diabetic ketoacidosis and new-onset diabetes, has changed, and we consider the wider impact of the pandemic on patients and healthcare service delivery, including some of the areas of uncertainty. Finally, we make recommendations on prioritising patients as we move into the recovery phase and also how we protect people with diabetes for the future, as COVID-19 is likely to become endemic.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Almost immediately after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus emerged, it was evident that diabetes was a key player in determining outcomes for those affected. Over the ensuing 2 years, the indirect effects of the pandemic on healthcare delivery in the short term have become prominent, along with the lingering effects of the virus in those who have been infected. This first global pandemic of the modern age has unleashed the full potential of the scientific community, and in vitro studies, human trials and big-data analyses have all been utilised to help decipher the complex interactions between coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and diabetes. This review discusses the current literature to answer three fundamental questions: (1) what is the impact of acute COVID-19 in people with diabetes; (2) how has the presentation and epidemiology of new-onset diabetes changed during the pandemic; and (3) what is the wider impact of the pandemic on patients and healthcare service delivery?
Acute COVID-19 in people with diabetes
The early reports from Wuhan, China suggested an over-representation of people with diabetes in those dying from COVID-19 [1]. The first report suggesting an independent effect of diabetes status on COVID-19-related mortality came from English data, studying records of over 17 million adults linked to 10,926 COVID-19-related deaths [2]. The fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for those with diabetes and HbA1c<58mmol/mol (<7.5%) was 1.31 (95% CI 1.24, 1.37), and for those with HbA1c≥58mmol/mol (≥7.5%) was 1.95 (1.83, 2.08). A subsequent larger study assessing the entire English population reported the odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital COVID-19-related mortality, by type of diabetes. Records of 263,830 (0.4%) individuals with a recorded diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, 2,864,670 (4.7%) individuals with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, 41,750 (0.1%) individuals with other types of diabetes and 58,244,220 (94.8%) individuals with no diabetes were linked to 23,698 in-hospital COVID-19-related deaths [3]. Adjusted for age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity and geographical region, compared with people without diabetes, the OR for in-hospital COVID-19-related death was 3.51 (95% CI 3.16, 3.90) in people with type 1 diabetes and 2.03 (1.97, 2.09) in people with type 2 diabetes. The relative effect of having diabetes was greater in younger people: in those younger than 70 years, compared with people with no diabetes, the OR was 6.39 (95% CI 5.40, 7.56) for people with type 1 diabetes and 3.74 (3.50, 3.99) for those with type 2 diabetes. The corresponding ORs for those older than 70 years were 2.81 (2.46, 3.22) and 1.79 (1.74, 1.85), respectively.
Using national diabetes data in England, Holman et al reported associations between risk factors and COVID-19-related mortality in 264,390 people with type 1 diabetes and 2,874,020 people with type 2 diabetes [4]. Male sex, older age, renal impairment, non-white ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation and previous stroke and heart failure were associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Compared with people with an HbA1c of 48–53 mmol/mol (6.5–7.0%), people with an HbA1c of ≥86 mmol/mol (≥10%) had increased COVID-19-related mortality (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.50, 3.30] in type 1 diabetes and 1.61 [1.47, 1.77] in type 2 diabetes). The association between BMI and COVID-19-related mortality was U-shaped: in type 1 diabetes, compared with people with a BMI of 25.0–29.9 kg/m2, people with a BMI of less than 20.0 kg/m2 had an HR of 2.45 (95% CI 1.60, 3.75) and those with a BMI of 40.0 kg/m2 or higher had an HR of 2.33 (1.53, 3.56). The corresponding HRs for type 2 diabetes were 2.33 (2.11, 2.56) and 1.60 (1.47, 1.75). Subsequent reports from whole populations, first from Scotland [5], then from Sweden [6], confirmed similar signals.
A systematic review of 18 studies reported a pooled prevalence of diabetes of 11.5% (95% CI 9.7, 13.4), with diabetes being associated with a high risk of severe COVID-19 (relative risk [RR] 2.11; 1.40, 3.19) compared with those without [7]. Despite the higher COVID-19-related risks for hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission and mortality for those with diabetes, there has been no evidence to suggest higher rates of infection in those with diabetes [8].
International guidelines for management of people with diabetes during the pandemic
When it became clear that people with diabetes were disproportionately affected in terms of hospitalisation and mortality, and in the absence of evidence to inform clinical practice, a number of consensus recommendations were published [9, 10]. Many country-specific guideline recommendations included outpatient and inpatient management, urgent and acute diabetes care, foot services, pregnancy services, management in emergency departments, therapeutic targets and routine use of glucose-lowering medications in clinical practice [10, 11]. Guidance for specific populations, such as those fasting for Ramadan during COVID-19 pandemic, were also published [12]. There were subsequent updates on practical recommendations, including post-pandemic recommendations [13].
Glucose-lowering therapies for people with diabetes during the pandemic
Most guidelines recommended tight glycaemic control in people with diabetes, more intense monitoring, and supporting therapies to reduce the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) [9, 11, 13]. In particular, caution was recommended regarding the use of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors due to concerns around ketoacidosis [9, 11]. Consistent findings from observational studies of people admitted in hospital reported that use of metformin was associated with better outcomes, whereas insulin was associated with worse outcomes. A meta-analysis of 18 studies with 12,277 patients with diabetes and COVID-19 reported that insulin was significantly associated with increased risk of mortality [14]. Interestingly, insulin treatment was associated with a significantly increased risk of hospital admission in people with type 2 diabetes (OR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06, 1.61) but a lower risk in people with type 1 diabetes (OR 0.14; 0.05, 0.35), although these results were based on a limited number of studies [14].
In contrast, a meta-analysis of nine studies with 10,233 people with type 2 diabetes reported lower mortality risk in people with diabetes on metformin (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43, 0.97) [15]. Another systematic review of 31 studies and 66,914 patients reported that metformin was associated with significantly lower mortality risk (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.50, 0.76), slightly lower mortality for sulfonylureas/glinides (OR 0.93; 0.89, 0.98) and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors were associated with a statistically non-significant lower mortality risk (OR 0.95; 0.72, 1.26) [16]. A further systematic review and meta-analysis of ten studies with 7012 COVID-19 patients with diabetes reported that there was no association between DPP4 inhibitors and severe COVID-19 (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.87, 1.31) or mortality (OR 1.14; 0.87, 1.51) [17]. Another meta-analysis of nine studies with 19,660 people with diabetes with COVID-19 suggested that pre-admission use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists was associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43, 0.66) [18].
The largest study included over 2.5 million people with type 2 diabetes in a nationwide observational study in England [19]. Overall the study findings showed that the adjusted HR for mortality for metformin was 0.77 (95% CI 0.73, 0.81), 1.42 (1.35, 1.49) for insulin, 0.82 (0.74, 0.9) for SGLT2 inhibitors, 0.94 (0.82, 1.07) for thiazolidinedione, 0.94 (0.89, 0.99) for sulfonylureas, 0.94 (0.83, 1.07) for GLP-1 receptor agonists and 1.07 (1.01, 1.13) for DPP4 inhibitors. However, the absolute differences in the risk were small and these findings were likely to be due to confounding by indication. The study recommended that there was no clear indication to change prescribing of glucose-lowering therapies during the pandemic in people with type 2 diabetes [19].
All observational studies have a number of sources of bias, including individual behaviours, individual characteristics, healthy user and adherer effects and confounding by selective prescribing [20]. RCTs are regarded as the gold standard for evaluating effectiveness of interventions, including pharmacological interventions. However, there have been few RCTs of glucose-lowering therapies in people with diabetes who have had COVID-19. One such study is the dapagliflozin in respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19 (DARE-19) trial, which was a double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT of 1250 patients, with and without diabetes, who were hospitalised with COVID-19 and who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor [21]. This study showed dapagliflozin was well tolerated and numerically resulted in fewer events of organ dysfunction but no statistically significant difference in the dual primary outcome of prevention (time to new or worsening organ dysfunction or death), or the hierarchical composite outcome of recovery by 30 days.
Identifying people with diabetes at high risk for population-level interventions
Over the course of the pandemic, a number of prediction models for severe manifestations and mortality due to COVID-19 have been derived to inform decisions about shielding, mitigating occupational exposure and prioritising for COVID-19 vaccinations. A recent systematic review highlighted two models as the most promising and well validated [22]. The first applied the Qresearch database, comprising 1205 general practices with 8.25 million adults aged 19–100 years in England, and used clinical data derived from individuals from before the pandemic to explore risks of COVID-19-related mortality. The final risk algorithms included age, ethnicity, deprivation, BMI and a range of comorbidities and performed well. For women and men with type 1 diabetes, adjusted HRs of COVID-19-related mortality at mean age were 4.02 (95% CI 2.07, 7.82) and 5.84 (3.97, 8.60), respectively, and for women and men with type 2 diabetes, adjusted HRs of COVID-19-related mortality at mean age were 6.29 (4.08, 9.70) and 4.74 (3.34, 6.71), respectively [23].
The second study derived a risk score to predict mortality in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. In total, 35,463 patients were included in the derivation dataset (mortality rate 32.2%) and 22,361 in the validation dataset (mortality rate 30.1%) using admission data. The final 4C Mortality Score included eight variables readily available at initial hospital assessment (age, sex, number of comorbidities [including diabetes], respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, level of consciousness, urea level and C reactive protein) and showed high discrimination for mortality with excellent calibration [24].
Subsequently, the Qresearch database was again applied to derive and validate risk prediction algorithms to estimate the risk of COVID-19-related mortality and hospital admission in UK adults after one or two doses of COVID-19 vaccination. The adjusted HR for COVID-19-related mortality for those with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c less than 59 mmol/mol (<7.5%) was 1.26 (95% CI 1.12, 1.42), and for those with HbA1c greater than or equal to 59 mmol/mol (≥7.5%) was 1.43 (1.21, 1.70). However, absolute risks for all groups were significantly lower following vaccination. There was insufficient power to assess risks for those with type 1 diabetes following vaccination [25].
How has the presentation and epidemiology of new-onset diabetes and DKA changed during the pandemic?
The direct and indirect impacts of COVID-19 on diabetes
Shortly after the pandemic began, reports emerged of an increase in presentations of new-onset diabetes [26,27,28,29], as well as DKA in people with pre-existing diabetes and in those with new-onset diabetes [27, 28, 30,31,32,33]. Many hypothesised a bi-directional relationship between COVID-19 and diabetes [34,35,36], whereby having diabetes was itself a risk factor for worse outcomes from COVID-19, but also, having COVID-19 was a risk factor for newly diagnosed diabetes and/or hyperglycaemic emergencies.
DKA during the pandemic
One of the first national studies comparing DKA to preceding years came from the German Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry of children and adolescents presenting with type 1 diabetes [37]. In 532 children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes presenting over the 3 months of the first wave, the frequency of DKA at presentation was significantly higher (44.7% vs 24.5% in 2019 vs 24.1% in 2018), as was the proportion presenting with severe DKA. The adjusted RR for DKA was highest in children under 6 years, females and those from an immigrant background. More granularity emerged from a population-wide study in England [38] analysing trends in DKA admissions across two waves of the pandemic and the period between waves in those with pre-existing type 1, type 2 and newly diagnosed diabetes. In people with type 1 diabetes, DKA admissions were significantly reduced across all study periods, but to a lesser extent between the waves. This was most pronounced in children and young adults under the age of 40 years (in whom reductions in recurrent admissions was also observed). For those with pre-existing type 2 diabetes, DKA admission rose significantly across all periods. In those newly diagnosed with diabetes at the time of their admission, rates of DKA were higher compared with preceding years across all the pandemic periods studied; 57% higher during the first wave, 56% higher in between waves (when rates of COVID-19 positivity were almost zero) and 61% higher during the second wave. Unlike the age associations observed for the reduction in DKA in those with type 1 diabetes (younger age groups) and increase in type 2 diabetes (older age groups), the high rates of DKA in those newly diagnosed was observed across all age categories.
In a more ethnically diverse US study [39] (>30% of 15,000 people studied were black, Hispanic or Asian), a rise in DKA cases in those with pre-existing type 1 diabetes was found during the first two COVID-19 waves compared with matched time periods in 2019, and the rise was more pronounced in non-Hispanic black individuals compared with non-Hispanic white.
Whilst most studies have shown a rise in DKA incidence in those newly presenting with diabetes (type 1 or other) the findings in those with pre-existing type 1 diabetes are less clear, with the English study of national data showing a reduction in incidence during COVID waves [38], whilst the US study showed an increase [39]. One reason for this may be the small numbers of non-white individuals in the English study inadequately capturing trends in these ethnic groups, along with differences in the way DKA and type 1 diabetes was defined. However, variation in DKA incidence between countries and geographies is well documented, and other healthcare factors and social determinants may also account for these differences [40].
The reduction of DKA in people with type 1 diabetes and increase in people with type 2 diabetes is supported by studies examining glycaemic control, which showed no deterioration of control in those with type 1 diabetes during the pandemic, in contrast to those with type 2 diabetes where a rise in HbA1c and BMI was noted [41, 42].
Putative explanations for excess DKA
DKA is a largely preventable complication in individuals with pre-existing type 1 diabetes, where infection or insulin omission are the primary causes [43], and in those newly presenting with type 1 diabetes, with earlier diagnosis through greater recognition of the initial symptoms. However, DKA may also occur in type 2 diabetes during catabolic illness, in which an excess of counterregulatory hormones can precipitate a relative insulin deficiency, and may occur as a hybrid presentation with hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state (a more common diabetic emergency in people with type 2 diabetes).
The reduction of DKA in people with pre-existing type 1 diabetes observed in some studies may be accounted for by the considerable shifts in lifestyle imposed by lockdown, and it is possible that in those usually vulnerable to DKA these changes mitigated DKA. For those with type 2 diabetes, the trend observed is interesting as the demographic most affected are older individuals, men and those from minority ethnic groups. These are also the characteristics of people most likely to have severe outcomes from COVID-19 [4]. One may hypothesise that the higher levels of DKA during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic may coincide with COVID-19 infection and represent the development of ketoacidosis in critically unwell individuals [44, 45]. It is not possible from existing studies to ascertain whether people were admitted because of DKA or whether DKA was coincidental at the time of admission with COVID-19, or even whether it developed after admission. However, this cannot be the only explanation as the rate of DKA remained higher in between pandemic waves. It could be speculated that DKA occurred in an at-risk type 2 diabetes population who did not have the tools to intensify control; analyses have shown high HbA1c levels in those presenting with DKA and type 2 diabetes [44], with only 38% of people insulin-treated.
The rise of DKA observed in people with newly diagnosed diabetes and in those with pre-existing type 2 diabetes suggests factors other than acute SARS-CoV-2 infection may contribute to the development of DKA. These include changes in lifestyle that may have led to decompensation of type 2 diabetes control, including significant weight gain [46], a reduction in contact with healthcare providers to discern deteriorating control (see next section), a trend in line with the year-on-year rise in DKA [47], or indeed a downstream effect of previous COVID-19 infection.
New-onset diabetes during the pandemic
Multiple studies have indicated a higher incidence of new-onset diabetes during the pandemic [48]. One large cohort study, which used the national database of the US Department of Veterans Affairs to build a cohort of 181,280 participants with a positive COVID-19 test, showed that, at a median follow-up of 352 days, people with COVID-19 had an increased risk of diabetes compared with the control group (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.36, 1.44) [49].
The precise mechanism for new-onset diabetes in COVID-19 is not yet known but may include previously undiagnosed diabetes, stress hyperglycaemia, steroid-induced hyperglycaemia or direct or indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the pancreatic beta cells [48]. One recent cross-sectional population-based study observed a slightly higher, but non-significant, increase in diabetes incidence in children in Canada during the pandemic [50]. The authors suggested that this could be due to delays in diagnosis during the early stages of the pandemic, with catch-up effect. This rise in new-onset diabetes has raised the possibility of a SARS-CoV-2 specific effect on the beta cells of the pancreas, compromising insulin production [51]. This hypothesis has been fuelled by multiple reports of new diabetes in children and reports of excess DKA in newly diagnosed individuals, or indeed insulin-requiring hyperglycaemia [52, 53]. If proven, SARS-CoV-2 would be the first such virus to target pancreatic beta cells in this way.
New-onset diabetes can be challenging to classify in patients presenting with DKA, especially in adults from non-European ethnicities; type 1 diabetes cannot always be assumed, instead DKA could represent ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes or indeed bona fide type 2 diabetes with a catabolic presentation. However, in children, the prior probability of type 1 diabetes is much higher. Although autoimmune in pathogenesis, the precipitation of type 1 diabetes usually requires a ‘second hit’ or environmental trigger, including infection [54, 55]. Hypothetically, there are several mechanisms by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus could directly lead to an increase in type 1 diabetes (Fig. 1): (1) the virus itself could directly injure pancreatic beta cells, which could occur whether a person is predisposed to autoimmune disease or not [51, 56]; (2) SARS-Cov-2 infection could be the trigger or ‘second hit’ precipitating type 1 diabetes in those predisposed; and (3) COVID-19 infection could simply unmask hyperglycaemia earlier in the disease trajectory in those already developing type 1 diabetes. Disentangling these potential ‘direct effects’ of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from ‘indirect effects’ is hugely challenging and studies analysing these associations have been complicated by confounders (Text Box 1). Indirect effects of the pandemic include a rise in levels of overweight and obesity due to lockdown measures, which could hasten the presentation of any type of diabetes [46], and changes in exposure of other endemic viruses [57, 58] that may have altered immune responses in those susceptible to developing type 1 diabetes.
Whether new-onset diabetes following SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely to remain permanent is not known as there are limited data on follow-up of patients newly diagnosed with COVID-19. In a study of 1902 people admitted with COVID-19, 31.2% had pre-existing diabetes and 13% had new-onset diabetes, which was more common in younger patients and less common in those of non-Hispanic white ethnicity [59]. Out of the survivors with new-onset diabetes, 56.3% continued to have diabetes and 40.6% regressed to normoglycaemia or prediabetes, and two were unable to be classified at a median follow-up of 323 days [59].
What is the wider impact of the pandemic on patients and healthcare service delivery?
Long COVID
As well as the acute effects of COVID-19, many survivors are now reporting incomplete recovery many months after acute infection, which has been referred to as long COVID. In December 2020, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines in the UK defined long COVID as the persistence of symptoms beyond 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection [60], including both ongoing symptoms occurring between 4 and 12 weeks and the post-COVID-19 syndrome when symptoms continue beyond 12 weeks. Recently, the WHO published a new definition of post-COVID-19 condition which refers to it as the persistence of symptoms 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, lasting for at least 2 months and not explained by other illnesses [61]. The most common symptoms of long COVID include fatigue and cough. Globally, long COVID is a major research focus [62], although there is little data on long COVID specifically in people with diabetes. One small case–control study reported that the most prevalent post-COVID symptoms were fatigue, breathlessness on exertion, and pain, but that there were no differences in limitations in activities of daily living nor differences in symptoms between those with and without diabetes [63]. Recently, a large US Department of Veterans Affairs cohort study of 153,760 individuals with COVID-19 showed that, beyond the first 30 days after infection, the overall risk of incident CVDs (including cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischaemic heart disease, pericarditis, thrombotic disorders, major adverse cardiovascular events and any cardiovascular outcomes) was increased in both people with and without diabetes, although the HR was lower in individuals without diabetes compared with people with diabetes [64].
COVID-19 effects on service delivery
In most nations, healthcare delivery outside of the acute setting was severely compromised as part of the pandemic response. This usually included a marked reduction of community/general practice services, restrictions to face-to-face consultations in both primary and secondary care, a shift to virtual consultations and omission of other facets of the consultation such as body measurements, blood tests and annual diabetes reviews [65, 66].
Whilst the direct risks of COVID-19 in people with diabetes have been well reported, data on the indirect effects of COVID-19 due to disruption in care have been lacking. One study assessed 25 million patients in the UK from general practice records and reported a significant reduction in type 2 diabetes diagnoses during the first wave of the pandemic (rate reduction in new diagnoses of 0.7) [66]. Although there was some recovery, the rate remained reduced later in 2020, and they estimated missed or delayed diagnoses of type 2 diabetes in ~60,000 individuals. One may speculate that a proportion of these will account for the excess of DKA presentations in ‘newly diagnosed’ diabetes categories.
In most nations, there are standards of care for people living with diabetes. For example, in England, people with diabetes should receive nine annual care processes. Delivery of care processes are important as higher completion has been associated with reduced mortality in a number of studies [67, 68]. In one pandemic study [69], the rates of performing these checks in people with type 2 diabetes reduced by 76–88% when compared with 10-year trends, disproportionately affecting older people from deprived areas. It is important to segregate immediate effects of a reduction in care delivered and the immediate effects of lockdown on outcomes, from the longer-term effects of this acute reduction in routine care delivery to people with diabetes. Delivery of care processes has also been associated with a longer-term reduction in lower limb amputation [70]. An English population study during the first wave of the pandemic [71] demonstrated significant reductions in rates of lower limb major amputations, minor amputations and revascularisation procedures in those with diabetes, compared with previous years.
A recent population-based parallel cohort study over a 15 week period in 2021 in England found that reduced delivery of eight care processes (checks of HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol, serum creatinine, urine albumin, foot surveillance, BMI and smoking status) following the pandemic onset was associated with a higher non-COVID-19-related mortality [72]. The incident rate ratio for non-COVID-19-related mortality, compared with the all-cause mortality over the same period in 2019 after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and diabetes type, was 1.02 (95% CI 1.01, 1.04). Non-COVID-19-related mortality in 2021 was highest in people who did not receive all eight care processes in either of the two previous years (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.56, 2.77), and intermediate in those who received all eight care processes in one of the two previous years, compared with those who received all eight care processes in both previous years [72].
Recovery from the pandemic
Inpatient setting
Potential reasons for deterioration of glycaemic control in people admitted to hospital include acute or chronic inflammation leading to worsening of insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia. Inpatient management should include delivery of care by multidisciplinary diabetes teams, use of technology including continuous glucose monitoring, achieving good glycaemic control, use of evidence-based therapies for COVID-19, improving patient education and also ensuring well-being of healthcare workers [73,74,75]. In view of the high risk of mortality or readmission, early routine follow-up would be important for patients discharged following admission due to SARS-CoV-2 infection [73].
Community setting
Previous natural disasters have shown that short-term disruptions to healthcare are associated with worse outcomes for people with diabetes within the short to medium term, including poor control of intermediate risk factors, such as glycaemic control, blood pressure, lipid control and worsening of mental health, and an overall negative impact on health and the economy [76,77,78,79]. The direct and indirect impact over 2 years of disruptions due to the pandemic will take time to manifest but are likely to be worse than the direct impact COVID-19 has had on people with diabetes (Fig. 2).
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant healthcare challenges for both healthcare professionals and patients [80]. As we now go into the recovery phase, it is imperative that people with diabetes are prioritised for early assessment of the care processes, including face-to-face consultations. Many healthcare organisations had been considering remote consultations (a key part of the pandemic response including telephone, videos and e-consultations), but the COVID-19 public health emergency has accelerated this initiative [81].
It is important to ensure that the inequalities seen during COVID-19 are not exacerbated with remote consultations, particularly for those who have difficulty with access to such consultations, including deprived populations, older adults and ethnic minority populations [82].
A number of organisations have suggested guidance for risk stratification to prioritise diabetes reviews for those at highest risk [83, 84]. However, simple pragmatic risk-based reviews could include people who are already known as being at highest risk, including people with poor pre-pandemic risk factor control, those living with obesity, those with microvascular complications (particularly chronic kidney disease), those with CVD and those with multiple comorbidities.
As well as prioritising patients who have not been reviewed during the pandemic, those who have been directly affected by COVID-19 will need to be followed up carefully. An Italian study reported that people aged between 45 and 94 years who tested positive for SARS-Cov-2 and were hospitalised had a significantly higher all-cause mortality (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.63, 2.25), and diabetes was associated with an increased risk of first cardiovascular event hospitalisation (IRR 2.24; 2.18, 4.25) [85]. In another study from England of people with COVID-19 who were discharged from hospital, 12.3% died and 29.4% were readmitted within 140 days with an IRR 3.5 (95% CI 3.4, 3.6) and 7.7 (7.2, 8.30) compared with the matched control participants [86]. The rates of respiratory disease, diabetes and new cardiovascular events were also significantly increased in patients discharged following COVID-19 [86]. It is therefore clear that people who have tested positive for COVID-19 or who have been admitted with COVID-19 will need close follow-up in the short to medium term.
Studies have shown that poor glycaemic control is associated with the worst outcomes, including mortality [19], and improving risk factor control is a priority as we open up to routine clinical care following lockdowns. There have been recent contradictory studies reporting the association of hyperglycaemia with vaccine effectiveness. One large study observed that COVID-19 vaccination induced a weak immunity in people with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control, compared with those with normoglycaemia [87]. Another study of 161 participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and 86 healthy control individuals observed that anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding antibody levels were comparable in healthy individuals and participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes irrespective of glycaemic control [88]. Another recent Italian study found that poor glycaemic control was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 breakthrough infections in people with diabetes [89]. The study concluded that poor glycaemic control after vaccination may worsen the immunological response to vaccines, which might favour SARS-CoV-2 infections in people with diabetes. Despite these contrasting findings, it is important to keep individualised glycaemic goals and prioritise these patients for vaccination.
Summary
Throughout the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, people with chronic diseases, including diabetes, have been disproportionately affected, with an increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality. Both direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 have had a substantial impact on people with diabetes, and whilst much has been learnt from this, there remain many areas of uncertainty (Text Box 2). As we move into the recovery phase, prioritising routine clinical reviews for risk factor control, appropriate therapeutic management and addressing mental well-being through self-management educational programmes is paramount. In view of the many uncertainties regarding the direct and indirect effects of COVID-19, people with diabetes will need to be followed up closely. Without this close oversight, there is likely to be a greater risk of poor outcomes in the short to medium term, and with it a significant burden to the healthcare system.
Abbreviations
- COVID-19:
-
Coronavirus disease-2019
- DKA:
-
Diabetic ketoacidosis
- DPP4:
-
Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4
- GLP-1:
-
Glucagon-like peptide-1
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- IRR:
-
Incidence rate ratio
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- RR:
-
Relative risk
- SARS-CoV-2:
-
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- SGLT2:
-
Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2
References
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R et al (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395(10229):1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K et al (2020) Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 584(7821):430–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4
Barron E, Bakhai C, Kar P et al (2020) Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID-19-related mortality in England: a whole-population study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(10):813–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30272-2
Holman N, Knighton P, Kar P et al (2020) Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(10):823–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30271-0
McGurnaghan SJ, Weir A, Bishop J et al (2021) Risks of and risk factors for COVID-19 disease in people with diabetes: a cohort study of the total population of Scotland. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(2):82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30405-8
Rawshani A, Kjolhede EA, Rawshani A et al (2021) Severe COVID-19 in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Sweden: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 4:100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100105
Singh AK, Gillies CL, Singh R et al (2020) Prevalence of co-morbidities and their association with mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 22(10):1915–1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14124
Hartmann-Boyce J, Rees K, Perring JC et al (2021) Risks of and from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 in people with diabetes: a systematic review of reviews. Diabetes Care 44(12):2790–2811. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-0930
Bornstein SR, Rubino F, Khunti K et al (2020) Practical recommendations for the management of diabetes in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(6):546–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30152-2
Rayman G, Lumb A, Kennon B et al (2020) Guidelines for the management of diabetes services and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabet Med 37(7):1087–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14316
Hartmann-Boyce J, Morris E, Goyder C et al (2020) Diabetes and COVID-19: risks, management, and learnings from other national disasters. Diabetes Care 43(8):1695–1703. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1192
Hanif S, Ali SN, Hassanein M, Khunti K, Hanif W (2020) Managing people with diabetes fasting for ramadan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a south Asian health foundation update. Diabetic Med J 37(7):1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14312
Steenblock C, Schwarz PEH, Ludwig B et al (2021) COVID-19 and metabolic disease: mechanisms and clinical management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(11):786–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00244-8
Yang Y, Cai Z, Zhang J (2021) Insulin treatment may increase adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:696087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.696087
Lukito AA, Pranata R, Henrina J, Lim MA, Lawrensia S, Suastika K (2020) The effect of metformin consumption on mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr 14(6):2177–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.11.006
Han T, Ma S, Sun C et al (2022) Association between anti-diabetic agents and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Med Res 53(2):186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.08.002
Hariyanto TI, Kurniawan A (2021) Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor and outcome from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in diabetic patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. J Diabetes Metab Disord 20(1):543–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00777-4
Hariyanto TI, Intan D, Hananto JE, Putri C, Kurniawan A (2021) Pre-admission glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19): a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 179:109031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109031
Khunti K, Knighton P, Zaccardi F et al (2021) Prescription of glucose-lowering therapies and risk of COVID-19 mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide observational study in England. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(5):293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00050-4
Shrank WH, Patrick AR, Brookhart MA (2011) Healthy user and related biases in observational studies of preventive interventions: a primer for physicians. J Gen Intern Med 26(5):546–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1609-1
Kosiborod MN, Esterline R, Furtado RHM et al (2021) Dapagliflozin in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors hospitalised with COVID-19 (DARE-19): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(9):586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00180-7
Miller JL, Tada M, Goto M et al (2022) Prediction models for severe manifestations and mortality due to COVID-19: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 29(2):206–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14447
Clift AK, Coupland CAC, Keogh RH et al (2020) Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study. BMJ 371:m3731. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3731
Knight SR, Ho A, Pius R et al (2020) Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterisation protocol: development and validation of the 4C mortality score. BMJ 370:m3339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3339
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland CA, Mehta N et al (2021) Risk prediction of covid-19 related death and hospital admission in adults after covid-19 vaccination: national prospective cohort study. BMJ 374:n2244. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2244
Unsworth R, Wallace S, Oliver NS et al (2020) New-onset type 1 diabetes in children during COVID-19: multicenter regional findings in the U.K. Diabetes Care 43(11):e170–e171. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1551
Chee YJ, Ng SJH, Yeoh E (2020) Diabetic ketoacidosis precipitated by Covid-19 in a patient with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 164:108166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108166
Li J, Wang X, Chen J, Zuo X, Zhang H, Deng A (2020) COVID-19 infection may cause ketosis and ketoacidosis. Diabetes Obes Metab 22(10):1935–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14057
Li H, Tian S, Chen T et al (2020) Newly diagnosed diabetes is associated with a higher risk of mortality than known diabetes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Diabetes Obes Metab 22(10):1897–1906. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14099
Heaney AI, Griffin GD, Simon EL (2020) Newly diagnosed diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis precipitated by COVID-19 infection. Am J Emerg Med 38(11):2491 e2493–2491 e2494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.114
Chan KH, Thimmareddygari D, Ramahi A, Atallah L, Baranetsky NG, Slim J (2020) Clinical characteristics and outcome in patients with combined diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state associated with COVID-19: a retrospective, hospital-based observational case series. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 166:108279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108279
Kim NY, Ha E, Moon JS, Lee YH, Choi EY (2020) Acute hyperglycemic crises with coronavirus disease-19: case reports. Diabetes Metab J 44(2):349–353. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2020.0091
Armeni E, Aziz U, Qamar S et al (2020) Protracted ketonaemia in hyperglycaemic emergencies in COVID-19: a retrospective case series. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(8):660–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30221-7
Rubino F, Amiel SA, Zimmet P et al (2020) New-onset diabetes in Covid-19. N Engl J Med 383(8):789–790. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2018688
Muniangi-Muhitu H, Akalestou E, Salem V, Misra S, Oliver NS, Rutter GA (2020) Covid-19 and diabetes: a complex bidirectional relationship. Front Endocrinol 11:582936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.582936
Apicella M, Campopiano MC, Mantuano M, Mazoni L, Coppelli A, Del Prato S (2020) COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(9):782–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30238-2
Kamrath C, Monkemoller K, Biester T et al (2020) Ketoacidosis in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. JAMA 324(8):801–804. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.13445
Misra S, Barron E, Vamos E et al (2021) Temporal trends in emergency admissions for diabetic ketoacidosis in people with diabetes in England before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(10):671–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00208-4
Lavik AR, Ebekozien O, Noor N et al (2022) Trends in type 1 diabetic ketoacidosis during COVID-19 surges at 7 US centers: highest burden on non-hispanic black patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107(7):1948–1955. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac158
Usher-Smith JA, Thompson M, Ercole A, Walter FM (2012) Variation between countries in the frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis at first presentation of type 1 diabetes in children: a systematic review. Diabetologia 55(11):2878–2894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2690-2
Garofolo M, Aragona M, Rodia C et al (2021) Glycaemic control during the lockdown for COVID-19 in adults with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 180:109066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109066
Ojo O, Wang XH, Ojo OO et al (2022) The effects of COVID-19 lockdown on glycaemic control and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(3):1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031095
Dhatariya KK, Glaser NS, Codner E, Umpierrez GE (2020) Diabetic ketoacidosis. Nat Rev Dis Prim 6(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0165-1
Misra S, Khozoee B, Huang J et al (2021) Comparison of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and over the same time period for the preceding 3 years. Diabetes Care 44(2):e29–e31. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2062
Kempegowda P, Melson E, Johnson A et al (2021) Effect of COVID-19 on the clinical course of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Endocr Connect 10(4):371–377. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0567
Valabhji J, Barron E, Bradley D, Bakhai C, Khunti K, Jebb S (2021) Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on body weight in people at high risk of type 2 diabetes referred to the English NHS diabetes prevention programme. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(10):649–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00218-7
Zhong VW, Juhaeri J, Mayer-Davis EJ (2018) Trends in hospital admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England, 1998-2013: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 41(9):1870–1877. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1583
Khunti K, Del Prato S, Mathieu C, Kahn SE, Gabbay RA, Buse JB (2021) COVID-19, hyperglycemia, and new-onset diabetes. Diabetes Care 44(12):2645–2655. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-1318
Xie Y, Al-Aly Z (2022) Risks and burdens of incident diabetes in long COVID: a cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00044-4
Shulman R, Cohen E, Stukel TA, Diong C, Guttmann A (2022) Examination of trends in diabetes incidence among children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada, from March 2020 to September 2021. JAMA Netw Open 5(7):e2223394. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23394
Accili D (2021) Can COVID-19 cause diabetes? Nat Metab 3(2):123–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-00339-7
Barrett CE, Koyama AK, Alvarez P et al (2022) Risk for newly diagnosed diabetes >30 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection among persons aged <18 years - United States, March 1, 2020-June 28, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 71(2):59–65. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7102e2
Kamrath C, Rosenbauer J, Eckert AJ et al (2022) Incidence of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: results from the DPV registry. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-0969
DiMeglio LA, Evans-Molina C, Oram RA (2018) Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 391(10138):2449–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31320-5
Quinn LM, Wong FS, Narendran P (2021) Environmental determinants of type 1 diabetes: from association to proving causality. Front Immunol 12:737964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.737964
Muller JA, Gross R, Conzelmann C et al (2021) SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas. Nat Metab 3(2):149–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-021-00347-1
Liu P, Xu M, Lu L et al (2022) The changing pattern of common respiratory and enteric viruses among outpatient children in Shanghai, China: two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Virol 94(10):4696–4703. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27896
Wan WY, Thoon KC, Loo LH et al (2021) Trends in respiratory virus infections during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore, 2020. JAMA Netw Open 4(6):e2115973. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15973
Cromer SJ, Colling C, Schatoff D et al (2022) Newly diagnosed diabetes vs. pre-existing diabetes upon admission for COVID-19: Associated factors, short-term outcomes, and long-term glycemic phenotypes. J Diabetes Complicat 36(4):108145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108145
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing COVID-19. Available from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng191. Accesed on 14th April 2022
World Health Organization(WHO) (2021) Defintion of Covid 19. Available from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. Accessed on 14th April 2022
Routen A, O'Mahoney L, Ayoubkhani D et al (2022) Understanding and tracking the impact of long COVID in the United Kingdom. Nat Med 28(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01591-4
Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Guijarro C, Torres-Macho J et al (2021) Diabetes and the risk of long-term post-COVID symptoms. Diabetes 70(12):2917–2921. https://doi.org/10.2337/db21-0329
Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z (2022) Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med 28(3):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01689-3
Curtis HJ, MacKenna B, Croker R et al (2022) OpenSAFELY NHS service restoration observatory 1: primary care clinical activity in England during the first wave of COVID-19. Br J Gen Pract 72(714):e63–e74. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0380
Carr MJ, Wright AK, Leelarathna L et al (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on diagnoses, monitoring, and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes in the UK. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(7):413–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00116-9
Holman N, Knighton P, O'Keefe J et al (2021) Completion of annual diabetes care processes and mortality: a cohort study using the National Diabetes Audit for England and Wales. Diabetes Obes Metab 23(12):2728–2740. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14528
McKay AJ, Gunn LH, Vamos EP et al (2021) Associations between attainment of incentivised primary care diabetes indicators and mortality in an English cohort. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 174:108746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108746
Carr MJ, Wright AK, Leelarathna L et al (2021) Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on diabetes health checks and prescribing for people with type 2 diabetes: a UK-wide cohort study involving 618 161 people in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013613
Gunn LH, Vamos EP, Majeed A et al (2021) Associations between attainment of incentivized primary care indicators and incident lower limb amputation among those with type 2 diabetes: a population-based historical cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 9(1):e002069. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-002069
Valabhji J, Barron E, Vamos EP et al (2021) Temporal trends in lower-limb major and minor amputation and revascularization procedures in people with diabetes in england during the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Care 44(6):e133–e135. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2852
Valabhji J, Barron E, Gorton T et al (2022) Associations between reductions in routine care delivery and non-COVID-19-related mortality in people with diabetes in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based parallel cohort study. Online ahead of print. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00131-0
Burr O, Berry A, Joule N, Rayman G (2021) Inpatient diabetes care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Diabetes UK rapid review of healthcare professionals' experiences using semi-structured interviews. Diabetic Med J 38(1):e14442. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14442
Korytkowski M, Antinori-Lent K, Drincic A et al (2020) A pragmatic approach to inpatient diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(9):dgaa342. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa342
Niknam Z, Jafari A, Golchin A et al (2022) Potential therapeutic options for COVID-19: an update on current evidence. Eur J Med Res 27(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00626-3
Sengul A, Ozer E, Salman S et al (2004) Lessons learnt from influences of the Marmara earthquake on glycemic control and quality of life in people with type 1 diabetes. Endocr J 51(4):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.51.407
Fonseca VA, Smith H, Kuhadiya N et al (2009) Impact of a natural disaster on diabetes: exacerbation of disparities and long-term consequences. Diabetes Care 32(9):1632–1638. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0670
Inui A, Kitaoka H, Majima M et al (1998) Effect of the Kobe earthquake on stress and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 158(3):274–278. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.3.274
Pibernik-Okanovic M, Roglic G, Prasek M, Metelko Z (1993) War-induced prolonged stress and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Psychol Med 23(3):645–651. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700025423
Chudasama YV, Gillies CL, Zaccardi F et al (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on routine care for chronic diseases: A global survey of views from healthcare professionals. Diabetes Metab Syndr 14(5):965–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.042
Danne T, Limbert C, Puig Domingo M et al (2021) Telemonitoring, telemedicine and time in range during the pandemic: paradigm change for diabetes risk management in the post-COVID future. Diabetes Ther 12(9):2289–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01114-x
Crawford A, Serhal E (2020) Digital health equity and COVID-19: the innovation curve cannot reinforce the social gradient of health. J Med Internet Res 22(6):e19361. https://doi.org/10.2196/19361
Nagi D, Wilmott E, Owen K et al (2021) ABCD position statement on risk stratification of adult patients with diabetes during COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Diabetes 21(1):123–131. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2021.282
Diggle J, Brown P (2020) How to undertake a remote diabetes review. Diabetes Primary Care 22(3):43
Profili F, Seghieri G, Francesconi P (2022) Effect of diabetes on short-term mortality and incidence of first hospitalizations for cardiovascular events after recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 187:109872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109872
Ayoubkhani D, Khunti K, Nafilyan V et al (2021) Post-covid syndrome in individuals admitted to hospital with covid-19: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 372:n693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n693
Marfella R, D'Onofrio N, Sardu C et al (2022) Does poor glycaemic control affect the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with type 2 diabetes: the CAVEAT study. Diabetes Obes Metab 24(1):160–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14547
Sourij C, Tripolt NJ, Aziz F et al (2022) Humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in diabetes is age-dependent but independent of type of diabetes and glycaemic control: the prospective COVAC-DM cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 24(5):849–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14643
Marfella R, Sardu C, D'Onofrio N et al (2022) Glycaemic control is associated with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients with type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun 13(1):2318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30068-2
Acknowledgements
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), NHS or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Authors’ relationships and activities
KK has acted as a consultant, speaker or received grants for investigator-initiated studies for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer. KK is Chair of the Ethnicity Subgroup of the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and Member of SAGE. SM is a trustee of the Diabetes Research and Wellness Foundation and has a grant in support of an investigator-initiated study from DexCom.
Contribution statement
All authors were responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the version to be published.
Funding
KK is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM) and the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). SM is supported by the NIHR BRC at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Slideset of figures
(PPTX 212 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Khunti, K., Valabhji, J. & Misra, S. Diabetes and the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetologia 66, 255–266 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05833-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05833-z